Summary
In the endosperm ofEchinocystis lobata the endopolyploid nuclei show structural changes of chromocentres typical of the process of endomitosis in Angiosperms.
The cytological differentiation of the endosperm proper and the chalazal haustorium in three further representatives of theCucurbitaceae: Sicyos angulata, Cyclanthera pedata andCitrullus colocynthis is also connected with endomitotic polyploidisation. The nuclei of the endosperm proper attain in the different species different levels of polyploidy, 384n, as a maximum. In the nuclei of the chalazal haustorium the degree of polyploidy is lower (as a maximum 24n).
The structure of polyploid nuclei which did not undergo postendomitotic mitoses shows some differences in the species studied in the course of the present work.Sicyos angulata has prochromosomic diploid nuclei, whereas those ofCitrullus colocynthis andCyclanthera pedata can be assigned to chromomeric nuclei with a dense structure. Endopolyploid nuclei of all three species studied are characterized by the occurence of compact chromocentres of different size; besides in some nuclei ofSicyos angulata andCyclanthera pedata the chromocentres within the resting nucleus reveal their chromomere structure. In addition, inCitrullus colocynthis nuclei with numerous thin threads of various degrees of spiralisation have been observed. — In all three species the endopolyploid nuclei after mitotic divisions have notably higher numbers of nucleoli and small chromocentres.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carniel, K.: Das Verhalten der Kerne im Tapetum mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Endomitosen und sogenannten Endomitosen. Österr. Bot. Z.99, 318–362 (1952).
Chopra, R. N.: Some observations on the endosperm development in theCucurbitaceae. Phytomorph.5, 219–230 (1955).
Chopra, R. N., andS. Agarwal: Some further observations on the endosperm haustoria in theCucurbitaceae. Phytomorph.8, 194–201 (1958).
Chopra, R. N., andB. Basu: Female gametophyte and endosperm of some members of theCucurbitaceae. Phytomorph.15, 217–223 (1965).
Czapska-Dziekanowska Danuta: Studies in the mode of reproduction and the differentiation of the endosperm ofPlantago atrata var.carpatica. Acta Biol. Crac.8, 101–112 (1965).
Darlington, C. D., and A. P.Wylie: Chromosome Atlas of Flowering Plants. London, 1955.
Enzenberg, Uta: Beiträge zur Karyologie des Endosperms. Österr. Bot. Z.108, 245–285 (1961).
Erbrich, P.: Über Endopolyploidie und Kernstrukturen in Endospermhaustorien. Österr. Bot. Z.112, 197–262 (1965).
Geitler, L.: Endomitose und endomitotische Polyploidisierung. Protoplasmatologia VIC, Wien 1953.
—: Riesenkerne im Endosperm vonAllium ursinum. Österr. Bot. Z.102, 460–475 (1955).
Hasitschka-Jenschke, Gertrude: Bemerkenswerte Kernstrukturen im Endosperm und im Suspensor zweierHelobiae. Österr. Bot. Z.106, 301–314 (1959 a).
—: Vergleichende karyologische Untersuchungen an Antipoden. Chromosoma10, 229–267 (1959 b).
—: Das Längenverhältnis der eu- und heterochromatischen Abschnitte riesenchromosomenartiger Bildungen verglichen mit dem der Prophasechromosomen beiBryonia dioica. Chromosoma12, 466–483 (1961).
—: Notizen über endopolyploide Kerne im Bereich der Samenanlage von Angiospermen. Österr. Bot. Z.109, 125–137 (1962).
Kirkwood, J. E.: The comparative embryology of theCucurbitaceae. Bull. N.Y. Gard.3, 313–402 (1905).
Lauber, Henriette: Untersuchungen über das Wachstum der Früchte einiger Angiospermen unter endomitotischer Polyploidisierung. Österr. Bot. Z.94, 30–60 (1947).
Löve, A., and D.Löve: Chromosome numbers of Central and North-West European plant species. Opera Botanica, Lund,5, 1961.
Maheshwari, P.: Recent advances in the embryology of Angiosperms. Delhi 1963.
Nagl, W.: Die SAT-Riesenchromosomen der Kerne des Suspensors vonPhaseolus coccineus und ihr Verhalten während der Endomitose. Chromosoma16, 511–520 (1965).
—: Die Riesenchromosomen vonPhaseolus coccineus L.: Baueigentümlichkeiten, Strukturmodifikationen, zusätzliche Nukleolen und Vergleich mit den mitotischen Chromosomen. Österr. Bot. Z.114, 171–182 (1967).
Singh, B.: Studies on the structure and development of seeds ofCucurbitaceae. Phytomorph.3, 224–239 (1953).
Singh, D.: Endosperm and its chalazal haustorium inCucurbitaceae. Agra Univ. Journ. of Res.6, 75–89 (1957).
Steffen, K.: Endomitosen im Endosperm vonPedicularis palustris. Planta47, 625–652 (1956).
Tschermak-Woess, Elisabeth: Karyologische Pflanzenanatomie. Protoplasma46, 798–834 (1956).
—: Über das regelmäßige Auftreten von „Riesenchromosomen“ im Chalazahaustorium vonRhinanthus. Chromosoma8, 523–544 (1957).
—: Strukturtypen der Ruhekerne von Pflanzen und Tieren. Protoplasmatologia V, Wien: Springer-Verlag. 1963.
Tschermak-Woess, Elisabeth, undGertrude Hasitschka: Veränderungen der Kernstruktur während der Endomitose, rhythmisches Kernwachstum und verschiedenes Heterochromatin bei Angiospermen. Chromosoma5, 574–614 (1953).
—: Über die endomitotische Polyploidisierung im Zuge der Differenzierung von Trichomen und Trichozyten bei Angiospermen. Österr. Bot. Z.101, 79–117 (1954.
Turała, Krystyna: Endomitotical processes during the differentiation of the anthers' hairs ofCucumis sativus L. Acta Biol. Crac.3, 1–13 (1960).
—: Cytological processes during the differentiation of the hairs ofEchinocystis lobata. Acta Biol. Crac.5, 151–169 (1962).
—: Studies in endomitotical processes during the differentiation of the tapetal layer of theCucurbitaceae. Acta Biol. Crac.6, 87–102 (1963).
—: Endopolyploidie im Endosperm vonEchinocystis lobata. Österr. Bot. Z.113, 235–244 (1966).
Weiling, F., undR. Schagen: Über die Präparation und Gestalt des Endospermhaustoriums bei den großsamigen Kürbisarten. Ber. dtsch. Bot. Ges.68, 1–10 (1955).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dedicated to Professor L.Geitler on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turała, K. Endopolyploidy and structures of the nuclei in the endosperm of theCucurbitaceae . Österr bot Z 116, 95–111 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01379614
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01379614