Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the growth and nutrition ofPicea abies (L.) karst. andPinus resinosa ait. On a K-deficient site subjected to K fertilization

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

On the oldest continuously studied forest fertilization trials in North America, at Pack Forest in New York State, a pronounced tree growth response has been attained with only K fertilization.

In 1951 110 kg per ha of K was applied broadcast to a 19 year oldPicea abies plantation and in 1950 90 kg per ha of K was applied broadcast to a 20 year oldPinus resinosa plantation. After 14 years from treatment for thePicea abies and 12 years from treatment for thePinus resinosa the growth response, and nutrient element uptake and distribution was examined by total tree analysis. There was a highly significant response to fertilization for both species. This response affected the dry weight proportions of the various tissue components, foliage, live branches, dead branches, bolebark and bolewood, in the fertilized and control plots of each species.Pinus resinosa produced more total weight on this site without treatment and responded much more strikingly to fertilization treatment thanPicea abies.

Picea abies nutrient uptake of N, P and Ca was approximately equal to or greater than that uptake byPinus resinosa on the control plots while the reverse was true for K and Mg. K fertilization exaggerated the differences in uptake between species. Fertilization in some cases altered the ranking of nutrient element content in various tissue components and the ranking of tissue components for the various nutrients elements.

This study quantifies the magnitude of the differences between the ecological efficiences of the two species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Heiberg, S. O., Madgwick, H. A. I., and Leaf, A. L., Some long-time effects of fertilization of red pine plantations. For. Sci.10, 17–23 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kawana, A., Xydias, G. K., and Leaf, A. L., Response ofPinus resinosa Ait. plantations to K fertilization on a K-deficient site. Plant and Soil29, 439–445 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leaf, A. L., K, Mg and S deficiencies in forest trees.In: Forest Fertilization Theory and Practice, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Ala. pp. 88–122 (1968).

  4. Leaf, A. L., America's oldest intensive fertilization experiments: Some lessons learned. Adv. Frontiers of Plant Sci. (India)24, 1–37 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leaf, A. L., Leonard, R. E., Berglund, J. V., Eschner, A. R., Cochran, P. H. Hart, J. B., Marion, G. M., and Cunningham, R. A., Soil nutrient-moisture-temperature interrelationships affecting growth and development ofPinus resinosa plantations subjected to irrigation-fertilization treatments.In: 3rd North Am. For. Soils Conf. Proc. (In print), (1970).

  6. Stone, E. L. and Leaf, A. L., Potassium deficiency and response in young conifer forests in eastern North America.In: Colloquium on Forest Fertilization, Proc. 5th Colloquium, Intern. Potash Institute, Jyvâskylä, Finland, pp. 217–229. (1967).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from the Department of Silviculture, State University College of Forestry at Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fornes, R.H., V. Berglund, J. & Leaf, A.L. A comparison of the growth and nutrition ofPicea abies (L.) karst. andPinus resinosa ait. On a K-deficient site subjected to K fertilization. Plant Soil 33, 345–360 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01378227

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01378227

Keywords

Navigation