Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of density and urban residence on voter turnout

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rate of voting in cities of the U.S. tends to be lower than one would expect when compared to nationwide voter participation rates. The hypothesis in question here is whether high population density and urbanness have a dampening effect on the likelihood of voting by persons living under such conditions. This question is examined by relating county voting rates in recent U.S. Presidential elections to various types of county population density, while controlling for fifteen potentially contaminating variables. The hypothesis that population density reduces voter turnout cannot be rejected on the basis of the test. There is a small but significant negative relationship between the press of population — represented by the population per square mile and urbanness — and voter turnout, even when the various control variables are present. More immediate types of density, such as housing unit and room density, appear to be insignificant. Possible reasons for the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, W.G. American voting participation.Western Political Quarterly 1966,19 639–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, M. The effects of density on social behavior and attitudes.American Behavioral Scientist 1975,18 815–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.H. Socio-Economic determinism of voting turnout: A challenge.The Journal of Politics 1974,36 731–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., Johnson, D.R., Edwards, J.N. Urban crowding and family.Journal of Population 1979,2 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A, & Welch, S. Crowding and urban crime rates. Manuscript, Lincoln: University of Nebraska, Department of Sociology, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D.The american voter. New York: John Wiley, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., & Cooper H.C.Group differences in attitudes and votes. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choldin, H.M., & Roncek, D.W. Density and pathology: The issue expanded. Manuscript, Urbana: University of Illinois, Department of Sociology, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedheim, J.W.Where are the voters? Washington, D.C.: The National Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galle, O.R., Gove, W.R., & McPherson, J.M. Population density and pathology: What are the relations for man?Science 1972,176 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini, A. Influences of the dwelling on family life.Ekistics 1973,36 344–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. Ecological regressions and behavior of individuals.American Sociological Review 1953,18 663–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, D.M. & Boynton, J.W. A multivariate regression analysis of differences in fertility of United States counties.Social Biology 1970,17 180–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C.E.Nonvoting americans. Series P-23, No. 102. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Petrocik, J.R., & Enokson, S.N. Voter turnout among the american states: Systematic and individual components.The American Political Science Review 1975,69 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. The proximity of others: A critique of crowding research and integration with the social sciences.Journal of Population 1979,2 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, R.H., Crain, E., & Maxwell, W.E.Politics in Texas. New York: West Publishing Company, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S.M.Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.D., Galle, O.R., & Zimmern, W. Population density, social structaure, and interpersonal violence.American Behavioral Scientist 1975,18 771–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCleskey, C., & Nimmo, D. Differences between potential, registered and actual voters: The Houston metropolitan area in 1964.Social Science Quarterly 1968,49 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L.N.Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics? Chicago: Rand McNally and Co., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. The experience of living in cities.Science 1970,167 1461–1468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, J.S.The family. Glencoe, Illinois: Glencoe Free Press, 1960, 510–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, A., & Epstein, L.D. The two electorates: Voters and non-voters in a Wisconsin primary.The Journal of Politics 1966,28 598–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W.S. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals.American Sociological Review 1950,15 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S., & Valen, H. The mobilization of the periphery: Data on turnout, party membership, and candidate recruitment in Norway. 1962,6 111–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. Some determinants of political apathy.Public Opinion Quarterly 1954–55,18 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shryock, H.S. Unpublished letter to author. Washington, D.C., (June 25, 1979).

  • Simmel, G.The sociology of Georg Simmel. Edited by Kurt H. Wolff. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S., Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.Population characteristics: Voting and registration in the election of November, 1976. Series P-20, No. 322. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., & Nie, N.Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L.Louis Wirth on cities and social life. Albert J. Reiss, Jr., (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Preuss, G.G. The effects of density and urban residence on voter turnout. Popul Environ 4, 246–265 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01375629

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01375629

Keywords

Navigation