Skip to main content
Log in

Orbital rates of earth satellites at resonances to test the accuracy of earth gravity field models

  • Published:
Celestial mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences among the Earth gravity field models, which were (in Klokočník and Pospíšilová, 1981) expressed as dispersions of the relevant lumped geopotential coefficients, are here transformed to the differences in variations of orbital quantities.

Theoretical formulae, the Lagrange (planetary) equations, describing the orbital rates near resonances due to the geopotential, are derived in a simple and unified form. They are then applied to estimate the orbital uncertainty as a function of Earth models differences. The first set of the Earth models (set I) consists of 11 models from the decade 1970–1980, of greatly varying quality; the set II contains several recent models; we present a test (for the 13th-to 15th-order) based on standard deviations of the lumped values of GEM 10B, which were estimated by means of independent resonant data (in Klokočník, 1982).

Maxima of the differences in the variations of the elements for the set I reach 8×10−4 deg day−1, 10–12 m day−1 or 200 m day−1 inI, a, orL 0=ω+M 0+Ω, respectively, for close and polar orbits (∼15 revs day−1); the values are not higher than 10−4 deg day−1, 1–2 m day−1 or 20 m day−1 inI, a,L 0 for higher orbits (∼6–7 revs day−1). For the set II, calibrated by resonant data, the maximum inaccuracy (±3σ) is about 3×10−4 deg day−1, ≤6 m day−1 or ≤100 m day−1 forI, a, andL 0 at 15 revs day−1, and is not larger than∼1×10−4 deg day−1, 2 m day−1 or 25 m day−1 for 13 revs day−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, R. R.: 1967,Planet. Space Sci. 15, 1829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, R. R.: 1971, Roy. Aircr. Establ. Techn. Rep. 71245.

  • Allan, R. R.: 1973,Planet. Space Sci. 21, 205; see also: in B. D. Tapley and V. G. Szebehely (eds.),Recent Advances in Dynamical Astronomy, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batrakov, Yu. V.: 1965, inProc. Internat Astronaut. Congr. (Paris 1963), IV, 7, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, and PWN-Warsawa, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P.: 1981,Bull. Geod. 55, 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, R. H.: 1971, Roy. Aircr. Establ. Techn. Rep. 71068; see also: 1971,Nature Phys. Sci. 231, 168.

  • Gooding, R. H.: 1975, ‘Studies of Resonance in the Orbits of Ariel Satellites’, (unpublished RAE Techn. Rep.), private communication.

  • Kaula, W. M.: 1966,Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ Co, Waltham.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-Hele, D. G. and Walker, D. M. C.: 1981, Roy. Aircr. Establ. Techn. Rep. 81006; see also: 1982,Proc. Roy. Soc. London A379, 247.

  • Klokočnik, J.: 1976,Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 27, 287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klokočnik, J.: 1982,Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 33, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klokočnik, J. and Kostelecký, J.: 1979, ‘Earth Gravitational Field Effect on a Nearly-Geostationary Satellite Orbit’,Edice VUGTK 5, 2, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klokočnik, J. and Pospišilová, L.: 1981,Planet. Space Sci. 29, 653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klokočnik, J. and Pospišilová, L.: 1984, ‘Intercomparisons of Earth Models by Means of Lumped Coefficients: Terms for Longitude and Eccentricity, to be publised. (Planet. Space Sci.)

  • Klosko, S. M. and Wagner, C. A.: 1982,Planet. Space Sci. 30, 5; also pres. XVII GA of IUGG, Canberra, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, F. J., Marsh, J. G., Klosko, S. M., and Williamson, R. G.: 1982a,J. Geophys. Res. 87, 3281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, F. J., Klosko, S. M., and Patel, G. B.: 1982b,Geophys. Res. Letters, to be published.

  • Marsh, J. G. and Williamson, R. G.: 1980,J. Astronaut. Sci. 28, 345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. H.: 1981, Ohio State Univ. Reports Department of Geod. Sci. No. 322.

  • Reigber, Ch. and Rummel, R.: 1979, in G. Veis and E. Livieratos (eds.),Proc. Internat. Symp. The Use of Artif. Satell. for Geodesy and Geodynamics, II, Athens, p. 217.

  • Reigber, Ch., Balmino, G., Moynot, B., and Müller, H.: 1982, ‘The GRIM 3 Earth Model Parameters’, DGFI and GRGS Internal Rep.

  • Wagner, C. A.: 1975,J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. A. and Klosko, S. M.: 1975, Goddard Space Flight Center X-921-75-187, see also: 1977,Celest. Mech. 16, 143.

  • Wakker, K. F. and Ambrosius, B. A. C.: 1982, Delft Univ. Techn. Rep. LR-342.

  • Wakker, K. F., Ambrosius, B. A. C., and der Ploeg, T.: 1982, Delft Univ. Techn. Rep. LR-352.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klokočník, J. Orbital rates of earth satellites at resonances to test the accuracy of earth gravity field models. Celestial Mechanics 30, 407–422 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01375510

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01375510

Keywords

Navigation