Skip to main content
Log in

Perineal canal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perineal canal (PC) is a rare anomaly constituting 4% of all anorectal malformations. Sixty patients (56 females and 4 males) with PC managed over the past 27 years are reported. The ages ranged from 2 days to 13 years. The chief symptom was passage of fecal matter through both the anus and the fistula. One girl had undergone previous, unsuccessful surgery. All our patients were treated by anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (ASARP), which allowed anatomic exposure and accurate repair of the anomaly. In 49 patients without any perineal inflammation primary ASARP was undertaken. Surgery was delayed in 11 patients with perineal excoriations and/or active inflammation. One patient died post-operatively due to unrelated causes and 1 developed a recurrence. Anal dilation was required in 7 cases. Fifty patients were seen at first follow-up 12 weeks after surgery. All were continent and had normal defecation without the use of laxatives. Thirty-four could be followed up to the age of 3 years; they were continent with normal bowel habits. There was no shift in the position of the anus and no instance of rectal dilation. Individualization of the management and operation by the anterior sagittal approach thus offers good results in this uncommon anorectal anomaly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bryndorf J, Madsen M (1960) Ectopic anus in the female. Acta Chir Scand 118: 466–478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaterjee SK (1980) Double termination of the alimentary tract - a second look. J Pediatr Surg 15: 623–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaterjee SK, Talukder BC (1969) Double termination of the alimentary tract in female infants. J Pediatr Surg 4: 237–243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeVries PA, Freidland GE (1974) Congenital ‘H’ type anourethral fistula. Radiology 113: 397–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ito H, Sano H, Ardo S, et al. (1976) Congenital rectovestibular fistula without imperforate anus. Geka (Surg) 38: 525–527

    Google Scholar 

  6. Okada A, Kamata S, Imura K, et al. (1992) Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for rectovestibular and anovestibular fistula. J Pediatr Sing 27: 885

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pegum JM, Loly PCM, Falkiner NM (1964) Development and classification of anorectal anomalies. Arch Surg 89: 481–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sai K, Uchino J, Kasai Y (1975) Congenital rectovestibular fistula with a normal anus. J Jpn Soc Pediatr Surg 11: 521

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stephens FD, Donellan WI (1979) H type urethroanal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 12: 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stephens FD, Smith ED (eds) (1971) Anorectal malformations in children. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, pp 51, 64, 80, 96, 116–117

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stephens FD, Smith ED (1986) Classification, identification and assessment of anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 1: 200–205

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tsuchida Y, Saito S, Honna T, et al. (1984) Double termination of the alimentary tract in females. A report of 12 cases and a literature review. J Pediatr Surg 19: 292–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. White JJ, Haller JAJ, Scott JR, et al. (1978) N type anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 13: 631–636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wakhlu, A., Pandey, A., Prasad, A. et al. Perineal canal. Pediatr Surg Int 12, 283–285 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01372150

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01372150

Key words

Navigation