Abstract
Modeling the effects of atmospheric drag is one of the more important problems associated with the determination of the orbit of a near-earth satellite. Errors in the drag model can lead to significant errors in the determination and prediction of the satellite motion. The uncertainty in the drag acceleration can be attributed to three separate effects: (a) errors in the atmospheric density model, (b) errors in the ballistic coefficient, and (c) errors in the satellite relative velocity. In a number of contemporary satellite missions, the requirements for performing the orbit determination and predictions in near real-time has placed an emphasis on density model computation time as well as the model accuracy. In this investigation, a comparison is made of three contemporary atmospheric density models which are candidates for meeting the current orbit computation requirements. The models considered are the analytic Jacchia-Roberts model, the modified Harris-Priester model, and the USSR Cosmos satellite derived density model. The computational characteristics of each of the models are compared and a modification to the modified Harris-Priester model is proposed which improves its ability to represent the diurnal variation in the atmospheric density.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roberts, C. E., Jr.: 1971, ‘An Analytical Model for Upper Atmosphere Densities based upon Jacchia's 1970 Models’,Celes. Mech. 4, 368.
Wagner, W. E. and Velez, C. E.: 1972, ‘Goddard Trajectory Determination Subsystem Mathematical Specifications’, NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center.
Elyasberg, P. E., Kugaenko, B. V., Synitsyn, V. M., and Voskovsky, M. I.: 1972, ‘Upper Atmosphere Density Determination from the Cosmos Satellite Deceleration Results’,Space Res. XII, 727.
Jacchia, L. G.: 1970, ‘New Statis Models of the Thermosphere and Exposphere with Empirical Temperature Profiles’, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Special Report No. 313.
Jacchia, L. G.: 1971, ‘Revised Static Models of the Thermosphere and Exosphere with Empirical Temperature Profiles’, Smithsonian Institution, Astrophysical Observatory, Special Report No. 332.
Dowd, D. L.: 1977, ‘Adaptive Estimation of Atmospheric Drag on Near Earth Earth Satellites’, Institute for Advanced Study in Orbital Mechanics, Technical Report 77-4, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex., U.S.A.
Harris, I. and Priester, W.: 1965, ‘Atmospheric Structure and Its Variations in the Region from 120 to 800 km’, COSPAR International Reference Atmosphere (CIRA).
Jacchia, L. G. and Slowey, J.: 1967, ‘The Shape and Location of the Diurnal Bulge in the Upper Atmosphere’,Space Res. VII, 626.
Botbyl, G. W.: 1973, ‘Technical Note on Expected Significance Using Subroutine ATDENS’, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Tex., internal memorandum.
Jacchia, L. G.: 1960, ‘A Variable Atmospheric Density Model from Satellite Accelerations’, Smithsonian Institution Astrophysical Observatory Research in Space, Special Report No. 39.
Jacchia, L. G., Campbell, I. G., and Slowey, J. W.: 1973, ‘A Study of the Diurnal Variation in the Thermosphere as Derived by Satellite Drag’,Planetary Space Sci. 21, 1825.
Jacchia, L. G.: 1965, ‘Satic Diffusion Models of the Upper Atmosphere with Empirical Temperature Profiles’, Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics, Vol. 8, No. 9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported by the NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center under contract NAS5-20946 and Contract NSG 5154.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dowd, D.L., Tapley, B.D. Density models for the upper atmosphere. Celestial Mechanics 20, 271–295 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01371367
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01371367