Abstract
Like whiskers of tin andtin-indium alloys indium whiskers showV-T andV-I characteristics with a large transition width and regular voltage steps. Applied HF-radiation leads to additional steps of zero slope in theV-I characteristics (“current steps”) at voltages related to the applied frequency by the Josephson relation, supporting the assumption that phase-slip processes at Josephson frequency are related to the appearance of voltage steps in the transition curves without radiation. At temperatures very close to the critical temperatureT c0 theV-I characteristics beyond the first voltage step show a differential resistance (dV/dI)1 and a ratioI 0/I c which grow with increasing temperature, contrary to tin andtin-indium alloy whiskers (I c : critical current,I 0: extrapolated zero voltage intercept). A probable explanation for this observation is, that in indium whiskers very close toT c0 nonequilibrium quasiparticles relax by branch crossing processes due to inelastic electron phonon scattering or gap anisotropy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
For a review of Ginsburg-Landau theory see for instance: Saint-James, D., Thomas, E.J., Sarma, G.: Type II Superconductivity, 1st ed. Chap. 2,5. London: Pergamon Press 1969; Tinkham, M.: Introduction to Superconductivity, 1st ed. Chap. 4. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Company 1975
Skocpol, W.J., Beasley, M.R., Tinkham, M.: J. Low Temp. Phys.16, 145 (1974)
Klapwijk, T.M., Mooij, J.E.: Phys. Lett.57A, 97 (1976)
Klapwijk, T.M., Sepers, M., Mooij, J.E.: J. Low Temp. Phys.27, 801 (1977)
Müller, W.H.-G.: Widerstandsverhalten sehr schmaler Wismutschichten beim Eintritt der Supraleitung. Thesis, Universität Karlsruhe (1973)
Meyer, J.D.: Appl. Phys.2, 303 (1973) Meyer, J., Minnigerode, G. v.: Phys. Lett.38A, 529 (1972) Meyer, J., Minnigerode, G.v.: Low Temperature Physics LT 13, Vol. 3, pp. 701–704. Edited by Timmerhaus, K.D., O'Sullivan, W.J., Hammel, E.F., New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation 1972
Meyer, J.D., Tidecks, R.: Solid State Comm.18, 305 (1976)
Tidecks, R., Meyer, J.D.: Z. Physik B32, 363 (1979)
Rieger, T.J., Scalapino, D.J., Mercereau, J.E.: Phys. Rev. B6, 1734 (1972)
Meyer, J.D., Tidecks, R.: Solid State Comm.24, 639 (1977)
Tidecks, R., Minnigerode, G.v.: phys. stat. sol. (a)52, 421 (1979)
Wilke, K.-Th.: Methoden der Kristallzüchtung, 1st ed. pp. 434–474. Frankfurt/Main: Verlag Harri Deutsch 1963
Meyer, J.D., Tidecks, R.: Solid State Comm.24, 643 (1977)
Tinkham, M.: J. Low Temp. Phys.35, 147 (1979)
White, G.K., Woods, S.B.: The Review of Scientific Instruments28, 638 (1957) (For an indium wire with a resistance ratioR 4.2K/R 295K≈9⋅10−5 the authors obtain an electrical resistivity at 295K ofρ 295K=8.8⋅10−6Ωcm. Thusρ 298K=(298K/295K)ρ 295K=8.9⋅10−2Ωµm)
Aleksandrov, B.N.: Soviet Phys. JETP16, 286 (1963) (We take the value (ρ⋅l)=1.48⋅10−3Ωµm2 from Table 3, the author has obtained for an indium single crystal with unknown orientation.)
Warburton, R.J., Webb, W.W.: Fluctuations Near the Phase Transition in ‘One-Dimensional’ Superconductors, in: Critical Phenomena in Alloys, Magnets and Superconductors. Mills, R.E., Asher, E., Jaffee, R.J. (eds.) pp. 451–469. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Company 1970 Webb, W.W., Warburton, R.J.: Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 461 (1968) Lukens, J.E., Warburton, R.J., Webb, W.W.: Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 1180 (1970) Newbower, R.S., Beasley, M.R., Tinkham, M.: Phys. Rev. B5, 864 (1972)
Josephson, B.D.: Phys. Lett.1, 251 (1962)
Meyer, J.D.: Appl. Phys.2, 303 (1973). Differential resistance evaluated from original size plots of Fig. 7, 9, 10, 11 therein
Jillie, D.W.: Interactions Between Coupled Thin-Film Microbridge Josephson Junctions, Ph. D. thesis. State University of New York at Stony Brook (1976) (The investigated long indium microbridge we refer to has a lengthL=123 µm, is 2.7 µm wide and 0.07 µm thick. The resistance at helium temperature isR 4.2K=9.6Ω, the mean free path is 900⋅10−10m, see Chap. 4.5 in [24])
Kramer, L., Watts-Tobin, R.J.: Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 1041 (1978)
Yu, M.L., Mercereau, J.E.: Phys. Rev. B12, 4909 (1975)
Tinkham, M.: Phys. Rev. B6, 1747 (1972) Remark: The identification of the parameterα introduced in Eq. (25) of that work has to be corrected by a factor of 2, so that Eq. (28) reads:τ(T c )=(8.4αT 3 c )−1; that meansα=1/(τ Θ Θ 3). This leads to a change of Eq. (26), which now readsT *≈Θ(3τ Θ /8t)1/3. Thus the correct form of Eq. (27) ist(T c )≈((3/8)τ Θ )(Θ/T c )3. Moreover, the correct reading of Eq. (38) isτ Q =(2T c /Δ)τ(T c ) that meansτ Q =(2T c /Δ)(τ Θ /8.4)(Θ/T c )3. WithΔ(0)=1.76T c we getτ Q =0.14τ Θ (Θ/T c )3 (Δ(0)/Δ(T)) as the correct form of Eq. (38) Concerning these corrections see Ref. 10 in: Clarke, J., Eckern, U., Schmid, A., Schön, G., Tinkham, M.: Branch Imbalance Relaxation Times in Superconductors. (Preprint)
Langenberg, D.N.: Nonequilibrium Phenomena in Superconductivity, in: Proceedings of the 14th International conference on Low Temperature Physics, Otaniemi, Finland, Vol. 5, pp. 223–263. Krusius, M., Vuorio, M. (eds.) Amsterdam, Oxford: North Holland Publishing Company, New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company 1975
Tinkham, M.: Introduction to Superconductivity, 1st ed. Chap. 8-3.1. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Company 1975
Kaplan, S.B., Chi, C.C., Langenberg, D.N., Chang, J.J., Jafarey, S., Scalapino, D.J.: Phys. Rev. B14, 4854 (1976)
As calculated by the BCS-theory. See Ref. 27, Remark to Eq. (38), and Ref. 29, pp. 34–35
Kittel, C.: Einführung in die Festkörperphysik, 3rd ed. München: Verlag Oldenbourg, Frankfurt: John Wiley and Sons 1973
This parameter was introduced in order to describe the effect of impurities upon the critical temperature of anisotropic superconductors and is determined as 〈a 2〉=0.021 for indium: Markowitz, D., Kadanoff, D.: Phys. Rev.131, 563 (1963)
Roberts, B.W.: Properties of Selected Superconductive Materials, p. 10. Washington, D.C., 20234: US-Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards 1972
See Ref. 28 and: Owen, C.S., Scalapino, D.J.: Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 1559 (1972)
Kramer, L.: private communication
Tinkham, M., Clarke, J.: Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 1366 (1972)
Mapother, D.E.: Phys. Rev.126, 2021 (1962) (Remark: The correct inscription of the ordinate of Fig. 3 must be −0.01, −0.02, becauseD(t) has negative values. See Ref. 6 of that work: Shaw, R.W., Mapother, D.E., Hopkins, D.C.: Phys. Rev.120, 88 (1960)
Saint-James, D., Thomas, E.J., Sarma, G.: Type II Superconductivity, 1st ed. London: Pergamon Press 1969
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tidecks, R., Slama, G. Breakdown of superconductivity in current-carrying indium whiskers. Z Physik B 37, 103–113 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01365366
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01365366