Abstract
This study examines the influences on disability among men and women controlling for the degree of functional incapacity imposed by chronic illness or impairment. The associations between demographic, attitude, social role characteristics and disability are separately examined for persons with mild and severe levels of limitation in order to determine whether different factors are associated with disability when impairment is mild as opposed to severe. Separate logit regressions are estimated for four sex/severity groups using data from the 1978 Survey of Disability and Work. It is hypothesized that among persons with severe impairments, only demographic variables will be significantly associated with disability because the severity of limitations would make other factors unimportant, while among persons who are mildly impaired attitudes and social roles will be important influences. Contrary to these expectations, the factors associated with disability are similar among the four sex/severity groups. In all four groups the presence of pain and fatigue strongly influence disability while gender roles are generally not associated with disability. Attitudes regarding the importance of work for self-esteem are also found to be associated with reports of disability. An unexpected outcome of this analysis is an indication of what predicts theabsence of disability among severely impaired persons. In particular, persons who report that their sense of self-esteem is tied to work are least likely to report disability. These findings suggest which non-medical factors may contribute to the maintenance of usual work roles and life activities among persons with severe levels of impairment. They also identify variables which may link impairment and disability across all levels of severity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bye B, Schechter E:1978 Survey of Disability and Work: Technical Introduction. Office of Policy, Social Security Administration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 1982, pp. 8–24.
Berkowitz M, Johnson WG, Murphy EH:Public policy toward disability. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1976, pp. 84–107.
Marcus AC, Seeman TE, Telesky C: Sex differences in reports of illness and disability: A further test of the fixed role hypothesis.Soc Sci & Med 17:993–1002, 1983.
Nathanson CA: Illness and the feminine role: A theoretical review.Soc Sci & Med 9:57–62, 1975.
Verbrugge LM: Females and illness: Recent trends in sex differences in the United States.J Hlth & Soc Behav 17:387–403, 1976.
Verbrugge LM: Gender and health: An update on hypotheses and evidence.J Hlth & Soc Behav 26:156–182, 1985.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services:Work disability in the United States: A chartbook. Washington, D.C.: Social Security Administration, 1980.
Allan K: First findings of the 1972 survey of the disabled: General characteristics.Soc Security Bull 39:18–37, 1976.
Deneen LJ, Hessellund TA:Vocational rehabilitation of the injured worker. Oakland, Ca.: L.J. Deneen, 1981, pp. 49–52.
Higgins PC:The rehabilitation detectives. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications, 1985, pp. 60–69.
Craig KD: Social modeling influences on pain. In RA Sternbach (Ed.),The psychology of pain. New York: Raven Press, 1978, pp. 73–109.
Reagles S: Chronic pain: Principles for rehabilitation counselors.Rehab Couns Bull 28:15–27, 1984.
Sternbach RA: Clinical aspects of pain. In RA Sternbach (Ed.),The psychology of pain. New York: Raven Press, 1978, pp. 241–264.
Solberg LI: Lassitude: A primary care evaluation.JAMA 251:3272–3275, 1984.
Fordyce WE: Learning processes in pain. In RA Sternbach (Ed.),The psychology of pain. New York: Raven Press, 1978, pp. 49–72.
Rockwell DA, Burr BD: The tired patient.J Fam Pract 5:853–857, 1977.
Eidelman D: Fatigue: Towards an analysis and a unified definition.Med Hypotheses 6:517–526, 1980.
Mudrick NR: Disabled women.Society 20:51–55, 1983.
Cole S, LeJeune R: Illness and the legitimation of failure.Am Soc Rev 37:347–356, 1972.
Verbrugge LM: Multiple roles and physical health of women and men.J Hlth & Soc Behav 24:16–30, 1983.
Verbrugge LM: Marital status and health.J Marriage & Fam 41:267–285, 1979.
Holmes TH, Masuda M: Life change and illness susceptibility. In BS Dohrenwend & BP Dohrenwend (Eds.),Stressful life events; Their nature and effects. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974, pp. 45–72.
Bielby DDV, Bielby WT: Work commitment, sex-role attitudes, and women's employment.Am Soc Rev 49:234–247, 1984.
Duchnok S: A measure of functional capacity. Office of Research & Statistics Working Paper No. 4. Washington, D.C.: Social Security Administration, 1979.
Additional information
Nancy R. Mudrick, Ph.D. is Associate Professor, School of Social Work, Syracuse University! Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Nancy R. Mudrick, Ph.D., Associate Professor, School of Social Work, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. 13244. This research has been supported by grant No. AG04347 from the National Institute on Aging. The author is grateful for their support and for the research assistance of Emelda Tabao-Driscoll.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mudrick, N.R. Predictors of disability among midlife men and women: Differences by severity of impairment. J Community Health 13, 70–84 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01364202
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01364202