Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible versus dedicated technology: A capacity expansion model

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past two decades, flexible manufacturing systems have been adopted in a variety of industries. Shorter product lives have necessitated acquiring flexible facilities. Further, the economies of scope that can be derived from producing products with different seasonality have made flexible facilities attractive. At the same time, dedicated facilities (such as transfer lines) have not disappeared because they offer economies of scale beneficial in high volume manufacturing environments. Hence, when producing a wide variety of products with different seasonality and demand growth rates, firms need to consider both economies of scale and economies of scope in deciding whether to acquire capacity of flexible or dedicated technology or both. In this paper, we consider the problem of making capacity acquisition decisions, when there is a choice of flexible and dedicated technologies available in a deterministic multi-product manufacturing environment with demand assumed to be nondeclining over time. We present a novel formulation of the problem and show the equivalence of the formulation to the uncapacitated plant location formulation. This enables us to use a very efficient solution procedure (Erlenkotter 1978) to solve even large problems optimally. We then present the results of an extensive computational study performed to evaluate the impact of key problem parameters on the proportion of flexible and dedicated capacity acquired. An interesting result of the study is that the proportion of flexible capacity acquired decreases with increasing scale economies. We also find that investment in flexible technology is significant even when it is relatively more expensive than dedicated technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker Precision Instruments, Inc., Case Study No. 9-687-052,Harvard Business School Publishing Division, Boston, MA (1987).

  • Burstein, Michael C., “Finding the Economical Mix of Rigid and Flexible Automation for Manufacturing Systems”Proceedings of the Second ORSA/TIMS Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, K.E. Stecke and R. Suri (Eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., Amsterdam (August 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuejols, Gerard, Fisher, Marshall L. and Nemhauser, George, “Location of Bank Accounts to Optimize Float: An Analytic Study of Exact and Approximate Algorithms,”Management Science, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 789–810 (November 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlenkotter, Donald,Pre-investment Planning for Capacity Expansion: A Multi-Location Dynamic Model, Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlenkotter, Donald, “Dynamic Programming Approach to Capacity Expansion with Specialization,”Management Science, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 360–363 (November 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlenkotter, Donald, “A Dual-based Procedure for Uncapacitated Facility Location,”Operations Research, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 922–1009 (November–December 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidenfelds, John,Capacity Expansion: Analysis of Simple Models with Applications. North Holland, New York, NY (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaikumar, Ramachandran, “Flexible Manufacturing Systems: A Managerial Perspective,” Working Paper No. 1-784-078, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaikumar, Ramachandran, “Post-industrial Manufacturing,”Harvard Business Review, No. 6, pp. 69–76 (November–December 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalotay, A.J., “Capacity Expansion and Specialization,”Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 56–64 (September 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalotay, A.J., “Joint Capacity Expansion without Rearrangement,”Operations Research Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 649–658 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krarup, Jakob and Bilde, Ole, “Plant Location, Set Covering, and Economic Lot Sizing: An O(mn) Algorithm for Structural Problems,” in L. Collatz, et al. (Eds.),Optimierung bei graphentheoretishen and ganzzahligen, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 155–180 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Shan-ling and Tirupati, Devnath, “Dynamic Capacity Expansion Problem with Multiple Products: Technology Selection and Timing of Capacity Additions,”Working Paper 89/90-4-12, Graduate School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luss, Hanan, “A Capacity Expansion Model for Two Facility Types,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 291–303 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luss, Hanan, “A Network Flow Approach for Capacity Expansion Problems with Two Facility Types,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 597–608 (December 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luss, Hanan, “Operations Research and Capacity Expansion Problems: A Survey,”Operations Research, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 907–947 (September–October 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luss, Hanan, “A Multi-facility Capacity Expansion Model with Joint Expansion Set-up Costs,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 97–112 (March 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luss, Hanan, “A Heuristic for Capacity Planning with Multiple Facility Types,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 685–702 (November 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Sang and Luss, Hanan, “Multi-facility type Capacity Expansion Planning: Algorithms and Complexities,”Operations Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 249–253 (March–April 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, Alan S.,Investments for Capacity Expansion: Size, Location and Time-Phasing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Thomas E., “Forward Algorithms for Forward-thinking Managers,”Applications of Management Science,, Vol. 1, pp. 1–55 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan, S., “Deterministic Capacity Expansion with Deterioration,”Management Science, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 525–539 (April 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Wickham,Manufacturing: The Formidable Competitive Weapon, Chapter 6, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajagopalan, S. Flexible versus dedicated technology: A capacity expansion model. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 5, 129–142 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358950

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358950

Key words

Navigation