Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting can today be controlled with the rdnew“ antiemetics or with their various combinations in a high percentage of patients. Despite this, for some subgroups of patients, certain chemotherapy regimens and some aspects of the phenomenon (delayed presentation), emesis remains a critical problem. Hence, there is the necessity for a continuous effort in the search for new drugs or better treatment modalities and the absolute requisite that these efforts be carried out according to a sound and verified trial methodology. Nausea and vomiting induced by antineoplastic agents are extremely variable phenomena, depending not only on the characteristics of chemotherapy regimens and of the patient population, but also on a subjective feeling generated by the impact of the care system on the patient's individual situation. Therefore, precisely because of this high variability, large comparative trials should be carried out to ensure that the sample is sufficiently representative for the most efficacious antiemetic regimen to be detected. In this field, some of the main problems arising in all clinical trials have their own specificity, particularly the study design, whether completely randomized or cross-over, the follow-up and the importance of prognostic factors. Among these, age, gender and previous chemotherapy with experience of nausea and vomiting have been confirmed as important. In addition, some topics must clearly be highlighted: the definition of the response variables and the assessment of variability of the results obtained with the same antiemetic regimen from one cycle of chemotherapy to the next (i.e. persistence). The greater attention devoted today to delayed emesis raises some methodological questions: this paper suggests some possible solutions for a better evaluation of this phenomenon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Del Favero A, Roila F, Basurto C, et al (1991) Assessment of nausea. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38:115–120
Gralla RJ, Clark RA, Kris MG, et al (1991) Methodology in anti-emetic trials. Eur J Cancer 27 [Suppl 1]:5–8
Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1993) Difference in persistence of efficacy of two antiemetic regimens on acute emesis during cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 11:2396–2404
Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1994) Cisplatin-induced delayed emesis: pattern and prognostic factors during three subsequent cycles. Ann Oncol 5:585–589
Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1995) Persistence of efficacy of three antiemetic regimens and prognostic factors in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 13:2417–2426
Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1995) Ondansetron versus granisetron, both combined with dexamethasone, in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Ann Oncol 6:805–810
Kris MG, Pisters KMW, Hinkley L (1994) Delayed emesis following anticancer chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2:297–300
Olver IN (1992) Antiemetic trials: methodological considerations. In: Diaz Rubio E, Martin M (eds) Antiemetic therapy: current status and future prospects. Creaciones Elba, Madrid, pp 81–94
Tonato M, Roila F, Del Favero A (1991) Methodology of antiemetic trials: a review. Ann Oncol 2:107–114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Presented in part as an invited lecture at the 7th International Symposium: Supportive Care in Cancer, Luxembourg, 20-23 September 1995
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tonato, M., Roila, F., Del Favero, A. et al. Methodology of trials with antiemetics. Support Care Cancer 4, 281–286 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358880
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358880