Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on the rhizosphere bacteria of ericaceous plants

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Comparative studies of the rhizosphere of ericaceous plants have indicated that the viable counts of bacteria were higher in the rhizosphere than in the control soil (acid forest soil, pH 3.8). Neither physiological nor morphological dissimilarities were very distinct. The number of auxoautotrophic bacteria was lower in the rhizosphere than in the surrounding soil. In the soil pleomorphic bacteria were as common as non-pleomorphic ones, whereas in the rhizosphere, organisms belonging to the non-pleomorphic group dominated. Further studies of ten different strains (five from the rhizosphere and five from the soil) have shown that the non-pleomorphic strains belong to the genera Pseudomonas, Achromobacter, and Flavobacterium, while the pleomorphic organisms showed properties corresponding to characteristics of the soil corynebacteria. The taxonomic position of these bacteria was less clear, but the observations indicate that they belong to the genus Arthrobacter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander, M., Introduction to soil microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York and London (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gyllenberg, H., The ‘rhizosphere effect’ of graminaceous plants in virgin soils. Physiol. Plantarum8, 644–652 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gyllenberg, H., The ‘rhizosphere effect’ of graminaceous plants in virgin soils. II. Nutritional characteristics of non-sporogenus bacteria associated with the roots. Physiol. Plantarum9, 119–129 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gyllenberg, H. and Hanioja, P., The ‘rhizosphere effect’ of graminaceous plants in virgin soils. III. Comparison with the effect of other plants. Physiol. Plantarum9, 441–445 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lochhead, A. G., Qualitative studies of soil micro-organisms. III. Influence of plant growth on the character of the bacterial flora. Can. J. Research18, 42–53 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lochhead, A. G. and Chase, F. E., Qualitative studies of soil microorganisms. V. Nutritional requirements of the predominate bacterial flora. Soil Sci.55, 185–195 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lochhead, A. G. and Thexton, R. H., Qualitative studies of soil microorganisms. VII. The ‘rhizosphere effect’ in the relation to the amino acid nutrition of bacteria. Can. J. Research25, 20–26 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manual of Microbiological Methods, ed. by the Soc. of Amer. Bacteriologists. New York (1957).

  9. Rhodes, M. R., The cytology of Pseudomonas spp. as revealed by a silver-plating staining method. J. Gen. Microbiol.18, 639–648 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  10. West, P. M. and Lochhead, A. G., Qualitative studies of soil microorganisms. IV. The rhizosphere in relation to the nutritive requirements of soil bacteria. Can. J. Research18, 129–135 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lode, A. Studies on the rhizosphere bacteria of ericaceous plants. Plant Soil 23, 161–170 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358342

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358342

Keywords

Navigation