Abstract
To discover the reasons for the failure in the performance of a neutron interferometer with a Fresnel biprism, proposed by Maier-Leibnitz and Springer, the experiments were repeated with a simple diffraction apparatus.
We found that the distortion of the diffraction pattern only arises in incorrect adjustment of the probes or in bad probe edges. There is therefore no reason to introduce a special coherent inelastic scattering mechanism into theory as suggested by Landkammer. It is shown that the biprism can be advantageously substituted by a quartz thread surrounded by a D2O—H2O mixture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonse, U., Hart, M.: Appl. Phys. Lett.6, 155 (1965)
Rauch, H., Treimer, W.: Phys. Letters47A, 369 (1974)
Kellström, G.: Nov. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Uppsal.8, Nr. 5 (1932)
Maier-Leibnitz, H., Springer, T.: Z. Physik167, 386 (1962)
Landkammer, F.J.: Z. Physik189, 113 (1966)
Mehringer, W.: Z. Physik210, 434 (1968)
Friedrich, H., Heintz, W.: PTB-Bericht FMRB 41/72
Friedrich, H., Heintz, W., Piefke, F.: PTB-Bericht FMRB 59/74
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedrich, H., Heintz, W. Neutron diffraction experiments with macroscopic objects. Z Physik B 31, 423–427 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01351554
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01351554