Skip to main content
Log in

An efficient method for creating benchmark classifications for automatic workpiece classification systems

  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The usefulness of an automatic workpiece classification system depends primarily on the extent to which its classification results are consistent with users' judgments. Thus, to evaluate the effectiveness of an automatic classification system it is necessary to establish classification benchmarks based on users' judgments. Such benchmarks are typically established by having subjects perform pair comparisons of all workpieces in a set of sample workpieces. The result of such comparisons is called a full-data classification. However, when the number of sample workpieces is very large, such exhaustive comparisons become impractical. This paper proposes a more efficient method, called lean classification, in which data on comparisons between the samples and a small number of typical workpieces are used to infer the complete classification results. The proposed method has been verified by using a small set of 36 sample workpieces and by computer simulation with medium to large sets of 100 to 800 sample workpieces. The results reveal that the method could produce a classification that was 71% consistent with the full-data classification while using only 10% of the total data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Bhadra and G. W. Fischer, “A new GT classification approach: a data base with graphical dimensions”, Manufacturing Review, 11, pp. 44–49, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. S. Chen, “A form feature oriented coding scheme”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 17, pp. 227–233, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. R. Henderson and S. Musti, “Automated group technology part coding from a three-dimensional CAD data-base”, Transactions of the ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, 110, pp. 278–287, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Kaparthi and N. Suresh, “A neural network system for shape-based classification and coding of rotational parts”, International Journal of Production Research, 29, pp. 1771–1784, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Lenau and L. Mu, “Features in integrated modeling of products and their production”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 6(1 and 2), pp. 65–73, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. C. Wu, J. R. Chen and S. R. Jen, “Global shape information modeling and classification of 2D workpieces”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 7(5), pp. 216–275, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. C. Wu and S. R. Jen, “A neural network approach to the classification of 3D prismatic parts”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 11, pp. 325–335, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. H. Hsu, T. C. Hsia and M. C. Wu, “A flexible classification method for evaluating the utility of automated workpiece classification system”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 13, pp. 637–648, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. K. Thompson, Sampling, John Wiley, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Labov, “The boundaries of words and their meanings”, in C.-J.N. Bailey and R. W. Shuy (eds) New Ways of Analyzing Variations in English, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. J. Chen and C. L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making — Method and Application, A State-of-art Survey, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Bandemer and W. Nather, Fuzzy Data Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.

  13. F. Bouslama and A. Ichikawa, “Fuzzy control rules and their natural control laws”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 48, pp. 65–86, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set Theory: and Its Application, 2nd edn, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.

  15. S. K. Tan, H. H. Teh and P. Z. Wang, “Sequential representation of fuzzy similarity relations”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 67, pp. 181–189, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. J. Klir and T. A. Folger, Fuzzy Set, Uncertainty, and Information, Prentice-Hall, 1992.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. Hsu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, S.H., Hsia, T.C. & Wu, M.C. An efficient method for creating benchmark classifications for automatic workpiece classification systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14, 481–494 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01351394

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01351394

Keywords

Navigation