Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of powdered pine bark for control ofMeloidogyne arenaria andHeterodera glycines on soybean

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Commercially avaiable pine bark nuggets (composted) and fresh pine bark were ground into powders and added at rates of 0 to 50 g kg−1 to field soil infested withMeloidogyne arenaria andHeterodera glycines. The treated soil was maintained moist in the greenhouse for 2 weeks, sampled, and planted with ‘Davis’ soybean (Glycine max.). Eight weeks after planting, numbers ofM. arenaria andH. glycines in soil decreased with increasing amounts of composted or fresh pine bark. No juveniles were present in soil treated with 5% pine bark. The number of galls and cysts g−1 root decreased in proportion to the amount of pine bark added to soil. Gall and cyst formation was completely eliminated at the 5% rate. Numbers of saprophagous nematodes were highest in soil with 4–5% pine bark. The activity of several soil enzymes was correlated with the addition of both composted and fresh pine bark. Fresh pine bark powder caused an increase in soil enzyme activity compared to composted pine bark, but did not provide consistent control of gall and cyst formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badra T, Saleh M A and Oteifa B A 1979 Nematicidal activity and composition of some organic fertilizers and amendments. Rev. Nematol. 2, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann E 1963 Die Analyse von Enzymen im Böden. In Modern Methods of Plant Analysis Vol. 6. Eds. K Paech and M V Tracey. pp 416–423. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoitink H A J, Inbar Y, and Boehm M J 1991 Status of compostamended potting mixes naturally suppressive to soilborne diseases of floricultural crops. Plant Disease 75, 869–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner R A, Rodríguez-Kábana R and Patterson R M 1983 Hemicellulosic waste and urea for control of plant-parasitic nematodes: Effect on soil enzyme activities. Nematropica 13, 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst H M and Burges N A 1968 Lignin and Humic Acids.In Soil Biochemistry. Vol. 1. Eds., A D McLaren and H L Peterson. pp 260–286. Marcel Dekker, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar Y, Boehm M J and Hoitink H A J 1991 Hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate in sphagnum peat container media for predicting suppressiveness to damping-off caused byPythium ultimum. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 479–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokalis-Burelle N 1993 Effects of Pine Bark on Fungal Growth and Infectivity.In Pine Bark as an Organic Soil Amendment: Effects on Soil Pathogens and Microbial Activity. pp 6–29. Ph.D. Dissertation Auburn University, AL.

  • Mian I H and Rodríguez-Kábana R 1982a Soil amendments with oil cakes and chicken litters for control ofMeloidogyne arenaria. Nematropica 12, 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian I H and Rodríguez-Kábana R 1982b Organic amendments with high tannin and phenolic contents for control ofMeloidogyne arenaria in infested soil. Nematropica 12, 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson N 1944 A photometric adaption of the Somogyi method for determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 153, 375–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak W 1964 Comparative studies on the bacterial population and saccharase activity of the soil. Plant and Soil 20, 302–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Kábana R 1986 Organic and inorganic amendments to soil as nematode suppressants. J. Nematology 18, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Kábana R and Hollis J P 1965 Biological control of nematodes in rice fields: role of hydrogen sulfide. Science 148, 524–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Kábana R and King P 1980 Use of mixtures of urea and blackstrap molasses for control of root-knot nematodes in soil. Nematropica 10, 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Kábana R and Pope M H 1981 A simple method for the extraction of nematodes from soil. Nematropica 11, 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Kábana R, Shelby R A, King P S and Pope M H 1982 Combinations of anhydrous ammonia and 1,3-dichloropropenes for control of root-knot nematodes in soybean. Nematropica 12, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Kábana R, Morgan-Jones G and Chet I 1987 Biological control of nematodes: Soil amendments and microbial antagonists. Plant and Soil 100, 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc 1987 SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.04 Edition, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitaramaiah K and Singh R S 1974 The possible effects onMeloidogyne javanica of phenolic compounds produced in amended soil. J. Nematology 6, 152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S P, Pant V, Khan A M, and Saxen S K 1983 Attractiveness ofMeloidogyne incognita larvae to roots of tomato and changes in biochemical content of plants as affected by oilcakes and nematicides. Nemat. Mediterranea 11, 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skujins J 1978 History of abiontic soil enzyme research.In Soil Enzymes. Ed. R G Burns. pp 1–49. Academic Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R E and Rodríguez-Kábana R 1982 The extraction and assay of soil trehalase. Plant and Soil 65, 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling G R 1991 Conservation and Enhancement of Naturally Occurring Antagonists and the Role of Organic Matter.In Biological Control of Plant Parasitic Nematodes. Ed. G R Stirling. pp 166–85. C.A.B. International.

  • Zeck W M 1971 A rating scheme for field evaluation of root-knot nematode infestation. Plazenschutz-Nacht. 24, 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Journal Series No. 18-933579 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kokalis-Burelle, N., Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Weaver, C.F. et al. Evaluation of powdered pine bark for control ofMeloidogyne arenaria andHeterodera glycines on soybean. Plant Soil 162, 163–168 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01347702

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01347702

Key words

Navigation