Skip to main content
Log in

Differential effect of double filtration plasmapheresis and standard plasma exchange on Guillain-Barré syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advantage of plasmapheresis over conservative therapies is well known in the treatment of severe Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Although there are several modes of plasmapheresis applicable to GBS, i.e., standard plasma exchange (PEX), double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), and immunoadsorption plasmapheresis (IAPP), no definite guidelines for selecting an optimum mode have been established so far. In the present study, we reviewed 27 cases of GBS treated with PEX, DFPP, or IAPP. Although the latter two methods appeared reasonably effective, PEX with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) exerted a brisk effect in three out of four cases of severe GBS refractory of DFPP. In GBS with axonal degeneration, however, the efficacy of plasmapheresis including PEX was questionable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnason GBW. Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Lambert EH, Bunge R (eds) Peripheral neuropathy, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1984;2050–2100

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Meche FG, van Doorn PA. Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: immune mechanisms and update on current therapies. Ann Neurol 1995;37:S14-S31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guillain-Barré syndrome study group. Plasmapheresis and acute Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neurology 1985;35:1096–1104

    Google Scholar 

  4. Osterman PO, Fagius J, Lundemo G, Pihlstedt P, Pirskanen R, Sidén A, Säfwenberg J. Beneficial effects of plasma exchange in acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy. Lancet 1984;2:1296–1298

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shinoda T, Arakura H, Yamagami E, Shirota T, Katakura M, Hara Y, Miyagi K, Miyazawa S, Takei Y, Koh C-S, Yanagisawa N. Reappraisal of plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Ther Apheresis 1991;9:237–240

    Google Scholar 

  6. French Cooperative Group on Plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Efficiency of plasma exchange in Giillain-Barré syndrome; role of replacement fluids. Ann Neurol 1987;22:753–761

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bouget J, Chevret S, Chastang C, Raphael JC. Plasma exchange morbidity in Guillain-Barré syndrome: results from the French prospectve, double-blind, randomised, multicenter study. The French Cooperative Group. Crit Care Med 1993;21:651–658

    Google Scholar 

  8. French Cooperative Group on Plasma Exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome: one-year follow-up. Ann Neurol 1992;32:94–97

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sakairi Y, Kusano E, Shindo Y, Odate T, Nagashima H, Aoki J, Amemiya M, akai Y, Yamaki M, Homma S, Muto S, Tabei K, Asano Y, Johshita H, Niijima K, Yoshida M. Double filtration plasmapheresis in guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Jpn J Apheresis 1989;8:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida I, Ootaka A, Honma S, Takeda S, Tabei K, Asano Y, Morita M, Nishizawa M, Yoshida M. Efficacy of plasma exchange and double filtration plasmapheresis on Guillain-Barré syndrome. Jpn J Apheresis 1991;10:77–83

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuwabara S, Nakajima M, Moroo I, Hirayama K. Double filtration and immunoadsorption plasmapheresis in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1996;36:289–292

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ishida H, Shimizu Y, Imada K, Itagaki T, Urushidani Y, Shimoyama R, Oono Y. Immunoadsorption with PH-350: as a beneficial therapy for acute Guillain-Barré syndrome. Biomater Artif Cells Immobiliz Biotechnol 1991;19:267–275

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yamazaki M, Koh CS, Hanyu N, Sakkai T, Inoue A, Yanagisawa N. Comparative study of the efficacy of plasma exchange, immunoadsorption plasmapheresis and corticosteriod administration in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Arerugi 1995;44:498–502

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shinoda T, Koh C-S, Arakura H, Yamagami E, Katakura M, Yanagisawa N. Immunoadsorption plasmapheresis and plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Ther Apheresis 1993;12:531–534

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shinoda T, Arakura H, Koh C-S. Plasmapheresis for autoimmune neurologic diseases. Artif Organs Today 1994;3:283–289

    Google Scholar 

  16. Couriel D, Weinstein R. complications of therapeutic plasma exchange: a recent assessment. J Clin Apheresis 1994;9:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hughes RAC, Kadlubowski M, Hufschmidt A. Treatment of acute inflammatory polyneuropathy. Ann Neurol 1981;9:125–133

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sasaki N, Ando Y, Tabei K, Kusano E, Yoshida M, Asano Y. Two cases of severe Guillain-Barré syndrome refractory to doublefiltration plasmapheresis but responsive to plasma exchange with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (letter). J Clin Apheresis 1996;11:165–167

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA, Schmitz PI, Tio Gillen AP, Herbrink P, Visser LH, Hooijkass H, van der Meché FG.Campylobacter jejuni infection and anti-GM1 antibodies in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Ann Neurol 1996;40:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  20. Creange A, Belec L, Clair B, Raphael JC, Gherardi RK. Circulating tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and soluble TNF-alpha receptors in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome. J Neuroimmunol 1996;68:95–99

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith GD, Hughes RA. Plasma exchange treatment and prognosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Q J Med 1992;85:751–760

    Google Scholar 

  22. McKhann GM, Griffin JW, Cornblath DR, Mellitis FD, Fisher RS, Quaskey SA. The guillain-Barré syndrome study group. Plasmapheresis and Guillain-Barré syndrome: analysis of prognostic factors and the effect of plasmapheresis. Ann Neurol 1988;23:347–353

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tagawa Y, Yuki N, Hirata K. Ability to remove immunoglobulins and antiganglioside antibodies by double filtration plasmapheresis in Guillain-Barré syndrome: is it equivalent to plasma exchange?) Ther Apheresis 1997;1:336–339

    Google Scholar 

  24. Raphael JC, Chevret S, MC Jars-Guincestre, Chastang C, Gajdos P. Immunoglobulins or plasma exchange? Guillain-Barré syndrome: indication for plasma exchange and immunoglobulins. Ann Med Interne Paris 1993;144:526–531

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thornton CA, Griggs RC. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of neuromuscular disease. Ann Neurol 1994;35:260–268

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bril V, Ilse WK, Pearce R, Dhanani A, Sutton D, Kong K. Pilot trial of immunoglobulin versus plasma exchange in pattients Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neurology 1996;46:100–103

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shumak KH, Humphrey JG, Chiu JY, Routledge ML, Elphick M, Humphrey HE. Toronto General Hospital controlled trial data plasma exchange therapy in Guillain-Barré syndrome. J Clin Apheresis 1985;2:326–331

    Google Scholar 

  28. Deisenhammer F, Keir G, Pfausler B, Thompson EJ. Affinity of anti-GM1 antibodies in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients. J Neuroimmunol 1996;66:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rees JH, Soudain SE, Gregson NA, Hughes RA.Campylobacter jejuni infection and Guillain-Barré syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1374–1379

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sasaki, N., Ando, Y., Yoshida, I. et al. Differential effect of double filtration plasmapheresis and standard plasma exchange on Guillain-Barré syndrome. J Artif Organs 1, 15–21 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01340447

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01340447

Key words

Navigation