Rheologica Acta

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 78–84 | Cite as

Foam rheology: Relation between extensional and shear deformations in high gas fraction foams

  • S. A. Khan
Original Contributions

Abstract

A two-dimensional hexagonal foam cell model is used to derive analytic expressions for the bulk stress tensor and foam microstructure for any small homogeneous deformation. We show that calculations done for deformations where the principal axes of stress and strain coincide, such as in extension, are sufficient to provide all information about shear deformation. The stresses and foam structure for any given strain and initial cell orientation in shear bears a unique relation to a different strain and orientation in extension. Such a mapping is obtained using the assumption that the principal axes of strain and stress corotate with each other. This in turn implies that high gas fraction foams follow the Lodge-Meissner relation, i.e. the ratio of the normal-stress difference to the shear stress equals the shear strain. The spatially periodic structure of foam along with the fact that the cell centers move affinely with the bulk, makes the above assumption a justifiable one.

Key words

Foam emulsion extensional deformation shear deformation hexagonal cell model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Princen HM (1983) J Coll Int Sci 91:160Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Princen HN (1985) J Coll Int Sci 105:150Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prud'homme RK (1981) paper presented at the 53rd Ann Meeting Soc Rheol, Lexington, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kraynik AM, Hansen MG (1986) J Rheol 30:409Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khan SA (1985) PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan SA, Armstrong RC (1987) J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech (in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lodge AS, Meissner J (1972) Rheol Acta 11:351Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larson RG (1985) J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 17:91Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Treolar LRG (1975) The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, 3rd ed, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Love AEH (1934) The Mathematical Theory of Rubber Elasticity. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bird RB, Hassager O, Armstrong RC (1977) Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Vol 1, John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petrie CJS (1979) J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 5:147Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Khan
    • 1
  1. 1.AT & T Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA

Personalised recommendations