Abstract
This paper demonstrates the use of local public record data by a rape crisis center for program planning and intervention in the area of rape prevention. While a number of national studies describe victim and offender characteristics and cirsumstances of rape, these studies may be inappropriate for local planning efforts due to the lack of generalizability of national or regional statistics to local populations. Local data, available from easily accessed police and court records provide immediate and relevant information for local needs.
Community rape data from the years 1977–1979 are described. Examples are presented which detail the use of local data by a rape crisis center to: enhance educational programs, target populations most needing victim services, improve program planning and volunteer training, facilitate intervention strategies with the police and court systems, and provide information for social service planning and advocacy.
Issues related to data collection are discussed, and the use of public record data by other grass-roots victim services such as spouse-abuse and elder-abuse prevention services is advocated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amir, M. (1971).Patterns of forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chappel, D., Geis, G., Schaefer, S., & Siegel, L. (1977). A comparative study of forcible rape offenses known to the police in Boston and Los Angeles. In D. Chappel, R. Geis, & G. Geis (Eds.),Forcible rape: The crime, the victim, and the offender. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fischer, J. (1973).Interpersonal helping. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.
Gager, N. & Schurr, C. (1976).Sexual assault: Confronting rape in America. New York: Grossett and Dunlap.
Hassenfeld, Y. (1983).Human service organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Holmes, K. A. & Williams, J. E. (1979). Problems and pitfalls of rape victim research: An analysis of selected methodological, ethical, and pragmatic concerns.Victimology, 4(1), 17–28.
Hursch, C. J. (1977).The trouble with rape. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Largen, M. A. (1976). History of women's movement in changing attitudes, laws and treatment toward rape victims. In M. J. Walker & S. L. Brodsky (Eds.),Sexual assault: The victim and the rapist. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Law Enforcement Assistant Administration. (1979).Rape victimization in twenty-six American cities. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
McDonald, J. (1971).Rape offenders and their victims. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.
North Carolina Department of Justice. (1980). Crime in North Carolina: 1980 Uniform Crime Report. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Justice.
Schram, D. (1978).Forcible rape. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
U.S. Department of Justice. (March, 1977).Forcible rape—A national survey of the response by policy (Vol. 1). Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
Walker, M. J. & Brodsky, S. L. (1976).Sexual Assault. Lexington Books.
Williams, J. E. & Holmes, K. A. Rape: (1979). The public view—The personal experience. Report to the National Institute of Mental Health. Rockville, Md.: National Center for the Prevention and Control of Rape.
Additional information
Jerry Finn, Ph.D., is in the Department of Social Work, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Finn, J. Local public record data: A rape crisis center tool for program planning and intervention. J Primary Prevent 5, 36–47 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01332032
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01332032