Skip to main content
Log in

Radiosensitivity of vertebral bone marrow CFU-S surviving in mice internally contaminated with239Pu or241Am

  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The radiosensitivity of pluripotent hemopoietic stem cells was studied in ICR “Swiss” mice (28 g/mouse) given i.v. 198.6 kBq239Pu/kg as citrate complex or 208.6 kBq241Am/kg as nitrate at the age of 10 weeks. The bone marrow cells were examined at the early and late phases of radionuclide contamination. To obtain data for survival curves andD 0 of stem cells the CFU-S assay was used and the donor vertebral marrow cells were exposed to the complementary X-irradiation either early after injection to the heavily irradiated recipients or to the “in vitro” irradiation given before the transplantation. To determine the iron uptake in splenic erythroid progeny the recipients given marrow cells unexposed to the X-rays received 37 kBq59Fe 6 h before they were killed and the relative activity per colony was calculated. The radiation effect of the used actinides on the bone marrow cells resulted in decreased cellularity and seriously altered both relative and absolute CFU-S numbers. The radiosensitivity of CFU-S increased in all intervals examined (D 0 from 0.60 to 0.86 Gy, in controls 0.97 to 1.06 Gy) and was more expressed when the CFU-S were exposed to the X-rays immediately after the bone marrow cell transplantation to the heavily irradiated hosts. The stem cell pool appeared, especially at older age, to be affected also in its ability to produce erythrocytic progeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaffey JT, Hellman S (1971) Differing responses to radiation of murine bone marrow stem cells in relation to the cell cycle. Cancer Res 31:1613–1615

    Google Scholar 

  2. Croizat H, Frindel E (1980) Study of a CFUs stimulating factor liberated by bone marrow cells after total and partial body irradiation. Exp Hematol 8:185–191

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duplan JF (1970) Hemopoietic cellular proliferation. Grune & Stratton, New York, p 189

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duplan JF, Feinendegen LE (1970) Radiosensitivity of colony-forming cells of the mouse bone marrow. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 134:319–321

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hellman S, Grate HE (1971) X-ray and alkylating agents alter differentiation of surviving hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 38:174–183

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hellman S, Grate HE, Chaffey JT (1969) Effects of radiation on the capacity of stem cell compartment to differentiate into granulocytic and erythrocytic progeny. Blood 34:141–156

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hübner GE, v. Wangenheim K-H, Feinendegen LE (1981) An assay for the measurement of residual damage of murine hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol 9:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lord BI (1981) The relationship ofG 0 to the cell cycle of haemopoietic spleen colony-forming cells. Cell Tissue Kinet 14:425–431

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lord BI, Wright EG (1980) Sources of haemopoietic stem cell proliferation: stimulators and inhibitors. Blood Cells 6:581–593

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schoeters GER, Vanderborght OLJ (1981) Temporal and spatial response of marrow colony-forming cells (CFU-s and CFU-c) after226Ra incorporation in BALB/c mice. Radiat Res 88:251–265

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schoeters GER, Vanderborght OLJ (1983) Relative effectiveness of241Am vs226Ra approached by haemopoietic stem cell studies in various bone marrow sites of contaminated mice. Health Phys [Suppl 1] 44:555–570

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siegers MP, Feinendegen LE, Lahiri SK, Cronkite EP (1979) Relative number and proliferation kinetics of hemopoietic stem cells in the mouse. Blood Cells 5:211–236

    Google Scholar 

  13. Siegers MP, v. Wangenheim K-H, Hübner GE, Feinendegen LE (1981) Residual damage and discontinuity of recovery in the hematopoietic system of mice following gamma-irradiation. Exp Hematol 9:346–354

    Google Scholar 

  14. Silini G, Pozzi LV (1971) Manual on radiation haematology. IAEA, Vienna, p 159

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sinclair WK (1968) Biophysical aspects of radiation quality (Second panel report). IAEA, Vienna, p 39

    Google Scholar 

  16. Svoboda V, Kofránek V (1975) Response of femoral and vertebral colony-forming units to226Ra internal contamination in mice. Radiat Res 64:467–474

    Google Scholar 

  17. Svoboda V, Kofránek V, Kotašková Z (1979) Effects of226Ra and X-irradiation on the proliferative and differentiative ability of mouse hemopoietic stem cells. Radiat Environ Biophys 16:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  18. Svoboda V, Kotašková Z, Lenger V, Thomas J (1979) Effect of239Pu on mouse hemopoietic stem cells in different types of bone marrow cavities. Radiat Environ Biophys 16:339–345

    Google Scholar 

  19. Till JE, McCulloch EA (1961) A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res 14:213–222

    Google Scholar 

  20. v. Wangenheim K-H, Siegers MP, Feinendegen LE (1980) Repopulation ability and proliferation stimulus in the hematopoietic system of mice following gamma-irradiation. Exp Hematol 8:694–701

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wright EG, Lord BI, Dexter TM, Lajtha LG (1979) Mechanisms of haemopoietic stem cell proliferation control. Blood Cells 5:247–258

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wright EG, Ali AM, Riches AC, Lord BI (1982) Stimulation of haemopoietic stem cell proliferation: characteristics of the stimulator-producing cells. Leukem Res 6:531–539

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svoboda, V., Sedlák, A. & Kotašková, Z. Radiosensitivity of vertebral bone marrow CFU-S surviving in mice internally contaminated with239Pu or241Am. Radiat Environ Biophys 23, 41–50 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326735

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326735

Keywords

Navigation