Skip to main content
Log in

Sex equity in mathematics and science education: Research-policy links

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the accumulation of a large body of research concerning effective sex equity practices in math and science, the lack of change in educational procedures suggests the need to reexamine the role of research in policy and program planning. This paper reviews the current research on sex equity in mathematics and science education, focusing on research in the categories of educator-student interaction, instructional context, and macrolevel demographics. Existing applications of current research to mathematics and science education programs are examined at regional, state, district, and individual school levels. Recommendations for future directions in policy and research are made, emphasizing the gaps in knowledge on each side. The paper ends with specific suggestions for strengthening the links between research and policy in the area of sex equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1988). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. In Ames, R., and Ames, C. (eds.),Research on Motivation in Education, Vol. 1 Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, pp. 177–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. (1980).Achievement and participation of women in mathematics. Final report to the National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. R. (1981). Differential treatment of females and males in mathematics classes.J. Res. Math. Educat. 12: 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P., and Minor, L. L. (1986). Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences.Am. Educat. Res. J. 23: 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P., and Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact?Science 210: 1262–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. E., and Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors.J. Voc. Behav. 23: 329–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, L., and Fox, L. H. (1980). An accelerated intervention for mathematically gifted girls. In Fox, L. H., Brody, L., and Tobin, D. (eds.),Woman and the Mathematical Mystique Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census (1984).Detailed Occupation of the Experienced Civilian Labor Force by Sex for the United States and Regions: 1980–1970 U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buswell, C. (1981). Sexism in school routines and classroom practices.Durham and Newcastle Res. Rev. 9: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Basic Educational Data System (1981).Student Enrollment by Subject in California Public Schools for 1980–1981 California State Department of Education, Sacramento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casserley, P. (1975). An assessment of factors affecting female participation in advanced placement programs in mathematics, chemistry, and physics. Report to the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

  • Chipman, S. F., Brush, L. R., and Wilson, D. M. (1985).Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. L., and Astuto, T. A. (1986). The significance and permanence of changes in federal education policy.Educat. Res. 15: 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, M. (1987). Teachers' interactions with girls and boys in science lessons. In Kelly, A. (ed.),Science for Girls? Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England, pp. 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (1980).Sex Roles and the School Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, E. E., and Tittle, C. K. (1985). Sex equity in testing. In Klein, S. S. (ed.),Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity Through Education Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donlon, T. F., Ekstrom, R. B., and Lockheed, M. E. (1979). The consequences of sex bias in the content of major achievement test batteries.Meas. Eval. Guid. 11: 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in mathematics participation. In Steinkamp, M. and Maehr, M. L. (eds.),Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 2 University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 367–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., and Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 46: 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Mac Iver, D., and Lange, L. (1986). Classroom practices and motivation to study math. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.

  • Eccles, J. S., Flanagan, C., Goldsmith, R., Jacobs, J., Jaryaratne, T., Wigfield, A., and Yee, D. (1987). Parents as socializers of achievement attitudes. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, Maryland.

  • Eccles, J. S., and Hoffman, L. W. (1984). Socialization and the maintainence of sex-segregated labor market. In Stevenson, H. W., and Siegel, A. E. (eds.),Research in Child Development and Social Policy, Vol. 1 University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethington, C. A., and Wolfle, L. M. (1986). Women's selection of quantitative undergraduate fields of study: Direct and indirect influences.Am. Educat. Res. J. 25: 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., and Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and affective factors.Am. Educat. Res. J. 14: 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. (1986). Autonomous learning behaviors and classroom environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.

  • Fottler, M. D., and Bain, T. (1984). Realism of occupational choice among high school seniors: Implications for quality of work life.J. Occupat. Behav. 5: 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giese, E. (1980). You can see the cat walking...A report on the findings of the Michigan Project on Equal Education Rights, Michigan PEER, Milford, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., and Brophy, J. E. (1978).Looking in Classrooms Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis.J. Counsel. Psychol. 32: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. R., and Post-Kammer, P. (1987). Black mathematics and science majors: Why so few?Vocat. Guid. Q. 35: 206–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G., and Klein, S. S. (1985). Understanding and measuring equity in education: A conceptual model.J. Educat. Eq. Lead. 5: 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. P., and Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Brooks-Gunn, J., and Peterson, A. (eds).Girls at Puberty Plenum, New York, pp. 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. (1987). Why girls don't do science. In Kelly, A. (ed.),Science for Girls? Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England, pp. 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A., Whyte, J., and Smail, B. (1985). Girls into science and technology: Final report. Department of Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. S. (ed.) (1985).Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity Through Education Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. S., and Simonson, J. (1984). Increasing sex equity in education: Roles for psychologists.Am. Psychol. 39: 1187–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. S., Russo, L. N., Tittle, C. K., Schmuck, P. A., Campbell, P. B., Blackwell, P. J., Murray, S. R., Dwyer, C. A. Lockheed, M. E., Landers, B. and Simonson, J. R. (1985). Summary and recommendations for the continued achievement of sex equity in and through education. In Klein, S. S. (ed.),Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity Through Education Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 439–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreinberg, N. (1981). 1,000 teachers later: Women, mathematics, and the components of change.Pub. Affairs. Rep. 22: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A. M., and Engle, M. (1979). Learning what's taught: Sex difference in instruction.J. Educat. Psychol. 71: 432–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., and Peterson, A. C. (1985). Facts and assumptions about the nature of sex differences. In Klein, S. S. (ed.),Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, E. (1984).Math Equity: Planned Change Model, Center for Sex Equity in the Schools, School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M. E., and Harris, A. M. (1978). The effects of equal cross-sex contact on students' sex stereotyped attitudes and behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Toronto.

  • Lockheed, M. E., and Harris, A. M. (1982). Classroom interaction and opportunities for cross-sex peer learning in science.J. Early Adol. 2: 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrett, C. (1986). On minority females in precollege math. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.

  • Marshall, S. P., and Ssmith, S. D. (1987). Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses.J. Educat. Psychol. 79: 372–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, K. (1975). Sex bias in tests of mathematical aptitude. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S. C. (1981). An inquiry into the resilience of Title IX reforms at the local level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, California.

  • National Research Council (1980).Science and Engineering Doctorates in the United States National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1984).Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1985).Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, C., and Meece, J. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Classroom influences.Child Devel. 53: 322–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L., and Fennema, E. (1985). Effective teaching, student engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics.Am. Educat. Res. J. 22: 309–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. R. (1986). Gender differences in patterns of achievement and adjustment during early adolescence. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Adolescence, Madison, Wisconsin.

  • Rosser, P. (1987).Sex Bias in College Admissions Tests: Why Women Lose Out National Center for Fair and Open Testing, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, P. (1988). Girls, boys, and the SAT: Can we even the score?NEA Today 48–53.

  • Sadker, M., and Sadker, D. (1986). Sexism in the classroom: From grade school to graduate school.Phi Delta Kappa 67: 512–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck, P. A., Adkison, J. A., Peterson, B., Bailey, S., Glick, G. S., Klein, S. S., McDonald, S., Schubert, J., and Tarason, S. L. (1985). Administrative strategies for institutionalizing sex equity in education and the role of government. In Klein, S. S. (edd.),Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity Through Education Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. P., and Schau, C. G. (1985). Sex equity and sex bias in instructional materials. In Klein, S. S. (ed.),Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity Through Education Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 218–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R. G., Rosenberg, F., and Rosenberg, G. (1973). Disturbance in the self-image at adolescence.Am. Sociol. Rev. 38: 553–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smail, B. (1984). Girl-friendly science. Reprinted in Kelly, A. (ed.),Science for Girls? Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England, pp. 80–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (1984). Single sex setting. In Deem, R. (ed.),Co-education Reconsidered Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. S., Molitor, L. L., Nelson, B. J., and Matthew, C. E. (1982).Career Oriented Modules to Explore Topics in Science University of Kansas, School of Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Lawrence, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, A., and Collings, J. (1981). Factors differentially affecting the science subject preferences, choices and attitudes of girls and boys. In Kelly, A. (ed.),The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education Manchester University Press, Manchester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, M. G. (1984). The biasing influence of pupil sex in a science marking exercise.Res. Sci. Technol. Educat. 2: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speizer, J. J. (1981). Role models, mentors, and sponsors: The elusive concepts.Signs 6: 692–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stage, E. K., Krienberg, N. L., Eccles, J. S., and Becker, J. R. (1985). Increasing the participation and achievement of girls and women in mathematics, science, and engineering. In Klein, S. S. (ed.),Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity Through Education Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanic, G. M. A., and Reyes, L. H. (1986). Gender and race differences in mathematics: A case study of a seventh-grade classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.

  • Tidball, M. E., and Kistiakowsky, V. (1976). Baccalaureate origins of American scientists and scholars.Science. 193: 646–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, D., and Fox, L. H. (1980). Career interests and career education: A key to change. In Fox, L. H., Brody, L., and Tobin, D. (eds.),Women and the Mathematical Mystique Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education (1984).Science and Mathematics Education in American High Schools: Results from the High School and Beyond Study National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, D.C., NCES 34-211b.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983).A nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhees, B. (1985).The Academy in Mentoring Eastern Michigan University, College of Education, Ypsilanti, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, J., and Gross, S. (1986). Performance of women and minorities in mathematics: A large school system perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.

  • West, J., Miller, W., and Diodata, L. (1985).An Analysis of Course-Taking Patterns as Related to Student Characteristics National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, J.E., Wigfield, A. Sex equity in mathematics and science education: Research-policy links. Educ Psychol Rev 1, 39–56 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326549

Key words

Navigation