Abstract
Three-fourths of all poverty in the United States is now concentrated among women and their children. This impoverishment is growing at an alarming rate, particularly among women who are not married—those who are single parents, those who are widows or never married women over the age of 65, and those who are displaced homemakers.
The feminization of poverty is fueled by complex cultural and material forces: cultural conceptions of women as dependents of men; the sexual division of labor within families; endemic racism in private and public realms; the dichotomous labor market and welfare system; and the pervasive discrimination that women and girls still encounter in schooling, housing, and at work. To reduce and prevent the feminization of poverty, a systematic campaign that confronts concomitantly each causal force is necessary. Such a campaign is detailed herein.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz, M. (1985). The family ethic and the female pauper: A new perspective on public aid and Social Security programs.Journal of Social Work Education, 21,(2, 15–26.
Bane, M.J., & Ellwood, D. (1983).Slipping Into and Out of Poverty: The Dynamics of Spells. Cambridge, Mass.: Urban Systems Research and Engineering.
Berk, R.A., & Berk, S.J. (1979).Labor and Leisure at Home: Content and Organization of the Household Day. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Billingsley, A. (1987). Black families in a changing society. In J. Dewart (Ed.),The State of Black America 1987 (pp. 97–111). New York: National Urban League.
Burnham, L. (1985). Has poverty been feminized in black America?The Black Scholar, 16,(2, 14–24.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (1986, Feb. 5).Administration Budget Contains Large Cuts in Programs for Poor. Unpublished report, Washington, D.C.
Ehrenreich, B., & Piven, F.F. (1984). The feminization of poverty: When the “family-wage system” breaks down.Dissent, 31, 162–170.
Erie, S.P., Rein, M. & Wiget, B. (1983). Women and the Reagan revolution: Thermidor for the social welfare economy. In I. Diamond (Ed.),Families, Politics, and Public Policy: A Feminist Dialogue on Women and the State (pp. 94–119). New York: Longman.
Ferree, M., & Hess. B. (1985).Controvery and Coalition: The New Feminist Movement. Boston: Twayne.
Gordon, D.M. (1972).Theories of Poverty and Underdevelopment. Boston: D.C. Health.
Grubb, W.N., & Lazerson, M. (1982).Broken Promises: How Americans Fail Their Children. New York: Basic Books.
Hatcher, K.J. (1984). The feminization of poverty: An analysis of poor women in New York City. Unpublished manuscript, prepared for Council Member Ruth W. Messinger of The Council of the City of New York.
Kahn, A.J. (1979).Social Policy and Social Services (2nd ed.. New York: Random House.
Keyserling, M.D. (1984, June). The status and contribution of American women to the economy: 1950–1983.Research Papers. National Conference on Women, the Economy, and Public Policy, Washington, D.C.
Malveaux, J. (1984). The status and contributions of women of color in the economy: 1950–1983.Research Papers, National Conference on Women, the Economy, and Public Policy, Washington, D.C.
Minkler, M., & Stone, R. (1985). The feminization of poverty and older women.The Gerontologist, 25, 351–357.
Pearce, D.M. (1983). The feminization of ghetto poverty.Society, 21,(1, 70–74.
Pearce, D.M. (1978). The feminization of poverty: Women, work and welfare.The Urban and Social Change Review, 11, 28–36.
Pearce, D.M. (1982).The Poverty of Our Future: The Impact of Reagan Budget Cuts on Women, Minorities, and Children. Washington, D.C.: Center for National Policy Review.
Pearce, D.M., & McAdoo, H. (1981).Women and Children: Alone and In Poverty. Washington, D.C.: Center for National Policy Review.
Remick, H. (Ed.). (1984).Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination: Technical Possibilities and Political Realities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sarri, R.C. (1985). Federal Policy Changes and the Feminization of Poverty.Child Welfare, 44, 235–47.
Scott, H. (1984).Working Your Way to the Bottom: The Feminization of Poverty. London: Pandora Press.
Spitze, G. (1986). The division of task responsibility in U.S. households: Longitudinal adjustments to change.Social Forces, 64, 689–701.
Stallard, K., Ehrenreich, B., & Sklar, H. (1983).Poverty in the American: Women and Children First. Boston: South End Press.
Statewide Emergency Network for Social and Economic Security. (1986, Feb.).Left Behind: A White Paper on Poverty and Federal Budget Priorities. Unpublished report, Albany, N.Y.
Swinton, D. (1987). Economic status of blacks 1986. In J. Dewart (Ed.),The State of Black America 1987 (pp. 49–73). New York: National Urban League.
United States Bureau of the Census. (1985).Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1986 (106th ed.). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
United States Commission on Civil Rights. (1983).A Growing Crisis: Disadvantaged Women and Their Children. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1986). Current Labor Statistics: Employment Data.Monthly Labor Review, 109,(5, 73.
United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1985). Work interruptions and the female-male earnings gap.Monthly Labor Review, 108,(2, 50–51.
Walker, A. (1983). Care for elderly people: A conflict between women and the state. In J. Finch & D. Groves (Eds.),A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring (pp. 106–128). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simon, B.L. The feminization of poverty: A call for primary prevention. J Primary Prevent 9, 6–17 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326524
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326524