Summary
In order to consider appropriate sustainable development, it is first necessary to understand the problems of developments that are inappropriate for specific population groups. Variables, such as, the culture of the group, its historical experiences, demographic and economic resources, population density, and remoteness or urban proximity should be scrutinized. This is a case study of one population group with a history of resource dependency.
Inchelium is a small Native American community on the Colville Indian Reservation in Washington, USA. The construction of a large dam ended fishing in Inchelium. Changes due to the dam have led to exploitation and degradation of the community's lifestyle. Several attempts at viable alternative economic development have led to disagreements about cultural and environmental issues. Lack of sustainable development has fostered a non-viable economy. In this economy half of the employable persons are unemployed, and 80 percent are dependent upon some form of government financial and service aid.
These problems are related to the effects of colonization found on all North American Indian reservations. A dependency relationship with the federal government has resulted in qualitative changes in the use of natural resources, from subsistence to extraction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blauner, R. (1969) Internal colonialism and ghetto revolt.Social Problems.,16, 393–408.
Bunker, S.G. (1984) Modes of extraction, unequal exchange, and the progressive underdevelopment of an extreme periphery: The Brazilian Amazon, 1600–1980.American Journal of Sociology,89 (5), 1017–1064.
Castle, E.N. (ed) (1993)Persistent poverty in rural America, Boulder: Westview Press.
Cruse, H. (1968)The crisis of the Negro intellectual. New York: Morrow.
Eastern Washington University (1990)Moses mountain study, pp. 1–4 to 1–5. Department of Urban Regional Planning, Eastern Washington University.
Jose, C. (1992) Eastern Washington University (pers. comm.).
McCoy, J. (1992) Washington challenges Indian Gaming Act.The Spokesman-Review, p. B4. (9 December).
Peroff, N.C. (1990) Indian policy and a couple of bears.The Social Science Journal, 283–301.
Robbins, R.L. (1992) Self-determination and subordinates. In M.A. Jaimes (ed)The state of native Americans, pp. 87–121. Boston: South End Press.
Sanders, I.T. (1960) The community social profile.American Sociological Review.
Scofield, R. (1977) Behind the buckskin curtain. Seattle: Seattle Pacific College.
The Institute for Natural Progress (1992) In usual and accustomed places: contemporary American Indian fishing rights struggles. In: M.A. Jaimes (ed)The State of Native Americans, pp. 217–239. Boston: South End Press.
The Spokesman-Review (1992) Gambling with their future, p. A13. (6 December).
The Spokesman-Review (1994) Jess Walter. Tribes win settlement over dam. (23 March).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr Pamela Elkind is Department Chairperson and Professor of Environmental Sociology at Eastern Washington University. David Lundgren is based in the Department of Sociology at Stevenson College. This paper was first delivered at the Global Forum '94 Conference in Manchester, UK.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elkind, P.D., Lundgren, D. Inchelium: non-sustainable resource dependency. Environmentalist 16, 9–18 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325610
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325610