Abstract
The flexible manufacturing system (FMS) considered in this paper is composed of two CNC machines working in series—a punching machine and a bending machine connected through rollers acting as a buffer system of finite capacity. The main difference between the present problem and the standard two-machine flow shop problem with finite intermediate capacity is precisely the buffer system, which in our problem consists of two stacks of parts supported by rollers: the first stack contains the output of the punching machine, while the second stack contains the input for the bending machine. When the second stack is empty, the first stack may be moved over. Furthermore, the capacity of each stack depends on the particular part type being processed.
The FMS can manufacture a wide range of parts of different types. Processing times on the two machines are usually different so that an unbalance results in their total workload. Furthermore, whenever there is a change of the part type in production, the machines must be properly reset—that is, some tools need to be changed or repositioned.
A second important difference between the present problem and the usual two-machine flow shop problem is the objective. Given a list ofp part types to be produced in known quantities, the problem considered here is how to sequence or alternate the production of the required part types so as to achieve various hierarchical targets: minimize the makespan (the total time needed to complete production) and, for instance, compress the idle periods of the machine with less workload into a few long enough intervals that could be utilized for maintenance or other reasons.
Although Johnson's rule is optimal in some particular cases, the problem addressed in the paper isNP-hard in general: heuristic procedures are therefore provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnetis, Alessandro, Claudio Arbib, and Kathryn E. Stecke, “Optimal Two-Machine Scheduling in a Flexible Flow System,”Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Integrated Manufacturing, RPI, Troy, NY (1990).
Agnetis, Alessandro, Claudio Arbib, and Kathryn E. Stecke, “Part Type Selection and Batch Sequencing in a Flexible Flow System,” Working Paper 670, Graduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1991).
Deserti, Lucia and Lucia N. Giraldo, “FMS: A Classification of Recent Literature,” in Francesco Archetti, Mario Lucertini, and Paolo Serafini (Eds.),Operations Research Models in Flexible Manufacturing Systems, pp. 289–305, CISM Courses and Lectures No. 306, Springer-Verlag, Wien (1989).
Gilmore, P.C. and R.E. Gomory, “Sequencing a One-State Variable Machine: A Solvable Case of the Traveling Salesman Problem,”Operations Research, Vol. 12, pp. 656–679 (1964).
Hwang, S., “Part Selection Problems in Flexible Manufacturing Systems Planning Stage,” in Kathryn E. Stecke and Rajan Suri (Eds.),Proceedings of the Second ORSA/TIMS Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 297–309 (August 1986).
Jha, Nand K. (Ed.),Handbook of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1991).
Johnson, S.M., “Optimal Two- and Three-Stage Production Schedules,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 1, pp. 61–68 (1991).
Kise, Hiroshi, Tadayoshi Shioyama, and Toshihide Ibaraki, “Automated Two-Machine Flowshop Scheduling: A Solvable Case,”Institute of Industrial Engineering Transactions, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 10–16 (1991).
Kusiak, Andrew,Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1990).
Mazzola, Joseph B. (Ed.), “Automated Manufacturing Systems,”Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 26, Baltzer, Basel (1990).
Papadimitriou, Christos H. and Paris C. Kanellakis, “Flowshop Scheduling with Limited Temporary Storage,”Journal of the ACM, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 533–549 (1980).
Rajagopalan, S., “Formulations and Heuristic Solutions for Parts Grouping and Tool Loading in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” in Kathryn E. Stecke and Rajan Suri (Eds.),Proceedings of the Second ORSA/TIMS Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 311–320 (1986).
Stecke, Kathryn E., “Procedures to Determine Part Mix Ratios for Independent Demands in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 359–369 (1992).
Stecke, Kathryn E. and I. Kim, “A Study of FMS Part Type Selection Approaches for Short-Term Production Planning,”International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7–29 (1988).
Stecke, Kathryn E. and I. Kim, “Performance Evaluation for Systems of Pooled Machines of Unequal Sizes: Unbalancing versus Balancing,”European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 42, pp. 22–38 (1989).
Stecke, Kathryn E. and I. Kim, “A Flexible Approach to Part Type Selection Using Part Mix Ratios in Flexible Flow Systems,”International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 53–75 (1991).
Stecke, Kathryn E. and Rajan Suri (Eds.), “Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications,”Annals of Operations Research, Baltzer, Basel, Vol. 3 (1985).
Stecke, Kathryn E. and Rajan Suri (Eds.), “Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications II,”Annals of Operations Research, Baltzer, Basel, Vol. 15 (1988).
van Dal, René, Jack A.A. van der Veen, and Gerard Sierksma, “Small and Large TSP: Two Polynomially Solvable Cases of the Traveling-Salesman Problem,”European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 69, pp. 107–120 (1993).
Whitney, C.K. and T.S. Gaul, “Sequential Decision Procedures for Batching and Balancing in FMSs,”Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 3, pp. 301–316 (1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andreatta, G., Deserti, L. & Giraldo, L.N. Scheduling algorithms for a two-machine flexible manufacturing system. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 7, 207–227 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325035
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325035