Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of family notification efforts and compliance with measles post-exposure prophylaxis

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposures to measles in medical settings have contributed to the recent resurgence of the disease in the United States. Following a measles exposure in two pediatric medical facilities serving an inner-city population, we investigated the effectiveness of a disease notification strategy and compliance of the exposed population with recommendations for post-exposure prophylaxis, two requirements of a successful intervention program. Of 106 families with children eligible for a prophylactic vaccination by standard guidelines, 64% were notified of exposure by telephone. Compliance was assessed by a brief telephone questionnaire based upon the Health Belief Model, and verified by medical records. Forty-six families were interviewed regarding their decisions to comply with the recommendations. Most (75%) families were compliant. Compliant parents perceived measles to be severe and their children to be in excellent health. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, only the perceived severity of measles significantly contributed to the model. We conclude that: infection control outreach may need to extend beyond telephone notification for an inner-city population, and that once notified, most people will comply with recommendations. The Health Belief Model explains compliance with infection control measures and may be useful in guiding public health interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Srugo I, Brunell PA, Measles Vaccine.Ped Annals 19:708–711, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control. Summary—Cases of specified notifiable diseases.MMWR 40: 898, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control. Imported measles with subsequent airborne transmission in a pediatrician's office-Michigan.MMWR 32:401–402, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloch AB, Orenstein WA, Ewing WM, et al. Measles outbreak in a pediatric practice: Airborne transmission in an office setting.Pediatrics 75:676–683, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis RM, Orenstein WA, Frank JA, et al. Transmission of measles in medical settings: 1980 through 1984.JAMA 255:1295–1298, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hutchins SS, Escolan J, Markowitz LE, et al. Measles outbreak among unvaccinated preschool-aged children: Opportunities missed by health care providers to administer measles vaccine.Pediatrics 83:369–374, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control. Measles-Dade County, Florida.MMWR 36:45–48, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Markowitz LE, Preblud SR, Orenstein WA, et al. Patterns of transmission in measles outbreaks in the United States, 1985–1986.N Engl J Med 320:75–81, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farizo KM, Stehr-Green PA, Simpson DM, Markowitz LE. Pediatric emergency room visits: A risk factor for acquiring measles.Pediatrics 87:74–79, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baltimore City Health Department.The Epigram June 1991.

  11. Centers for Disease Control. Measles prevention: Recommendations of the immunization practices advisory committee.MMWR 38(no.S-9):1–18, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Diseases:Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases 22 edition. Elk Grove Village, Illinois: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1991. Pp. 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pickett G and Hanlon JJ.Public Health: Administration and Practice 9th edition. St. Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riddiough MA, Willems JS, Sanders CR, Kemp K. Factors affecting the use of vaccines: Considerations for immunization program planners.Public Health Rep 96:528–535, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: A decade later.Health Educ Q 11:1–47, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bodenheimer HC, Fulton JP, Kramer PD. Acceptance of Hepatitis B vaccine among hospital workers.Am J Public Health 76:252–255, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carter WB, Beach LR, Inui TS, Kirscht JP, Prodzinski JC. Developing and testing a decision model for predicting influenza vaccination compliance.Health Serv Res 20:897–932, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cutts FT, Orenstein WA, Bernier RH. Causes of low preschool immunization coverage in the United States. Centers for Disease Control manuscript, 1990.

  19. Becker MH, Haefner DP, Kasl SV, Kirscht JP, Maiman LA, Rosenstock IM. Selected psychosocial models and correlates of individual health-related behaviors.Med Care 15:27–46, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Calnan MW, Moss S. The health belief model and compliance with education given at a class in breast self-examination.J Health Soc Behav 25:198–210, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Becker MH, Maiman LA, Kirscht JP, Haefner DP, Drachman RH. The health belief model and prediction of dietary compliance: A field experiment.J Health Soc Behav 18:348–366, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daniel WW.Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1983. Pp. 95–97, 493.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Becker MH, Drachman RH, Kirscht JP. A new approach to explaining sick-role behavior in low-income populations.Am J Public Health 64:205–216, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Becker MH, Nathanson CA, Drachman RH, Kirscht JP. Mothers' health beliefs and children's clinic visits: A prospective study.J Community Health 3:125–135, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  25. King JB. The impact of patients' perceptions of high blood pressure on attendance at screening: An extension of the Health Belief Model.Soc Sci Med 16:1079–1091, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Langlie JK. Social networks, health beliefs and preventive health behavior.J Health Soc Behav 18:244–260, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cummings KM, Jette AM, Brock BM, Haefner DP. Psychosocial determinants of immunization behavior in a swine influenza campaign.Med Care 17:639–649, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marks JS, Halpin TJ, Irvin JJ, Johnson DA, Keller JR. Risk factors associated with failure to receive vaccinations.Pediatrics 64:304–309, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hilts PJ. Panel ties measles epidemic to breakdown in health system. InNY Times January 9, 1991.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Susan Feigelman, MD, is Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Bonita Stanton, MD, Professor of Pediatrics; Judith D. Rubin, MD, MPH, is Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; Nancy A. Cartelli, MD, is a former Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, all at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

This study was possible due to the efforts of Maureen Black, Anna Gadomski, Lisa Horton, Virginia Keane, James King, Richard Lichenstein; and the staff of the Pediatric Ambulatory Center and the Pediatric Emergency Room. We wish to also acknowledge the assistance of Edward M. Hirshorn and the Maryland State Department of Health, and the statistical and analytical assistance of Christopher Loffredo, P. David Wilson, Susan Zuravin and Madelene Countess.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feigelman, S., Stanton, B., Rubin, J.D. et al. Effectiveness of family notification efforts and compliance with measles post-exposure prophylaxis. J Community Health 18, 83–93 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324417

Keywords

Navigation