Skip to main content
Log in

Legislative interventions to increase access to screening mammography

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although numerous studies have established that breast cancer mortality can be significantly reduced through early detection, only a small percentage of women obtain screening mammograms at intervals recommended by the National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society, and other major medical organizations. This paper examines the importance of cost as a barrier to routine screening and the state legislative movement to make screening mammography a basic health insurance benefit. Mammography “knowledge, attitudes, and behavior” studies offer conflicting findings on the extent to which cost enters into the decision to have a mammogram. Women seldom report cost as a major reason for postponing or failing to have a mammogram; yet, descriptive studies show a consistently positive relationship between income and mammography use.

State mammography reimbursement laws vary greatly with respect to whether screening mammography is a required or optional benefit, payment limits, and eligibility and referral requirements. Although state-specific data on the percentage of women with private health insurance are not available, 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey estimates for U.S. Census geographic divisions suggest that the New England, East North Central, West North Central, Middle Atlantic, and Mountain states have the highest percentages of women who are privately-insured and, thus, potentially eligible for legislated mammography benefits. Access to screening mammography also is likely to be influenced by the proportion of employer-sponsored health plans that are self-insured and, therefore, exempt from minimum benefit mandates and the extent to which women are aware of the screening coverage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Physician Payment Review Commission:The Costs of Providing Screening Mammography: Report to Congress. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, No. 89-2, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, RD, Edwards, K and Hane, N, Barriers to breast cancer screening in older women.Fam Community Health 10: 51–56, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control, Use of mammography—United States, 1990.MMWR 39:621–630, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dawson, DA and Thompson, GB:Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Screening: United States, 1987. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 90–1500, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium, Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportunity?JAMA 264: 54–58, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rimer, BK, Trock, B, Engstrom, PF, Lerman, C and King, E, Why do some women get regular mammograms?Am J Prev Med 7: 69–74, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallup Organization:A Study of Women's Awareness and Use of Mammograms. Unpublished results of a survey sponsored by the American Cancer Society and analyzed by Lieberman Research. Princeton, NJ: Gallup Organization, February 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Cancer Institute, Office of Cancer Communications:Report: National Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Survey. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lantz, PM, Remington, PL and Soref, M, Self-reported barriers to mammography: Implications for physicians.Wis Med J 89: 602–606, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lerman, C, Rimer, B, Trock, B, Balshem, A and Engstrom, P, Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.Prev Med 19: 279–290, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zapka, JG, Costanza, ME, Stoddard, A and Green, HL: Breast cancer screening: Perceptions and experience of primary care physicians, radiologists, and women. In PF Engstrom, BK Rimer and LE Mortenson (Eds.)Advances in Cancer Control: Screening and Prevention Research. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990, Pp. 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lane, DS and Burg, MA, Breast cancer screening: Changing physician practices and specialty variation.NY State J Med 90: 288–292, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fox, SA, Murata, PJ and Stein, JA, The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women.Arch Intern Med 151: 50–56, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burg, MA, Lane, DS and Polednak, AP, Age group differences in the use of breast cancer screening tests: The effects of health care utilization and socioeconomic variables.J Aging Health 2: 514–530, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Centers for Disease Control, Use of mammography for breast cancer screening—Rhode Island, 1987.MMWR 37: 357–361, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bastani, R, Marcus AC and Hollatz-Brown, A, Screening mammography rates and barriers to use: A Los Angeles County survey.Prev Med 20: 350–363, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stein, JA, Fox, SA and Murata, PJ, The influence of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological barriers on use of mammography.J Health Soc Behav 32: 101–113, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Slenker, SE and Grant, MC, Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge about mammography among women over forty years of age.J Cancer Educ 4: 61–65, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sangamon State University, Institute for Public Affairs:Women's Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs About Mammography and Breast Care: Focus Group Findings. Springfield, IL: Sangamon State University, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schechter, C, Vanchieri, CF and Crofton, C, Evaluating women's attitudes and perceptions in developing mammography promotion messages.Public Health Rep 105: 253–257, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coll, PP, O'Connor, PJ, Crabtree, BF and Besdine, RW, Effects of age, education, and physician advice on utilization of screening mammography.J Am Geriatr Soc 37: 957–962, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zapka, JG, Stoddard, AM, Costanza, ME and Greene, HL, Breast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors.Am J Public Health 79: 1499–1502, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anda, RF, Sienko, DG, Remington, PL, Gentry, EM and Marks, JS, Screening mammography for women 50 years of age and older: Practices and trends, 1987.Am J Public Health 6: 123–129, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woolhandler, S and Himmelstein, DU, Reverse targeting of preventive care due to lack of health insurance.JAMA 259: 2872–2874, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hayward, RA, Shapiro, MF, Freeman, HE and Corey, C, Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer?Arch Intern Med 148: 1177–1181, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson, RA and Murata, PJ, Demographic, clinical, and financial factors relating to the completion rate of screening mammography.Cancer Detect Prev 11: 259–266, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson, GB, Kessler, LG and Boss, LP, Breast cancer screening legislation in the United States: A commentary.Am J Public Health 79:1541–1543, 1989, p. 1541.

    Google Scholar 

  28. American Cancer Society, 1989 survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.CA 40: 77–101, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Edwards, W and Berlin, M:Questionnaires and Data Collection Methods for the Household Survey and the Survey of American Indians and Alaska Natives. National Medical Expenditure Survey Methods 2, National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment. Rockville, MD: Public Health Services, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 89-3450, September 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sullivan, CB, DiCarlo, S and Rice, T:Technical Methodology: HIAA Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefit Plans. Washington, DC: Health Insurance Association of America, February 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marquis, MS, Consumers' knowledge about their health insurance coverage.Health Care Financ Rev 5: 65–80, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McPhee, SJ, Richard, RJ and Solkowitz, SN, Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice.J Gen Intern Med 1: 275–281, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fox, SA, Klos, DS and Tsou, CV, Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians.Radiology 166: 431–433, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rimer, BK, Trock, B, Balshem, A, Engstrom, PF, Rosan J and Lerman, C, Breast cancer screening practices among primary physicians: Reality and potential.J Am Board Fam Pract 3: 26–34, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Martha M. McKinney is a Health Services Analyst and Katherine M. Marconi is Associate Director of Science and Epidemiology in the Bureau of Health Resources Development of the Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland. The research on which this paper is based was conducted while Dr. McKinney was a Cancer Prevention Fellow and Dr. Marconi was Chief of the Public Health Applications Research Branch in the National Cancer Institute's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKinney, M.M., Marconi, K.M. Legislative interventions to increase access to screening mammography. J Community Health 17, 333–349 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323996

Keywords

Navigation