Skip to main content
Log in

Worksite health promotion in four Midwest cities

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of worksite health promotion activities in nine areas of health was conducted in four Midwest cities—Winona and St. Cloud, MN; Eau Claire, WI and Sioux Falls, SD to determine how many worksites are involved in these activities; how many different kinds of programs they offer; and whether or not worksite involvement is growing in these areas of health. All worksites with over 100 employees were surveyed with a completion rate of 96% for eligible worksites. Comparing program offerings at worksites with such offerings by other community providers, we find worksites provide 40% of the total of such programs to adults. They tend to operate most programs independently of other community providers. Exercise and smoking cessation programs are most commonly offered. Worksites in the four communities significantly differed in the number of exercise program options offered and in the prevalence of worksite involvement in home, personal and drivers' safety programs. Compared to national survey results, worksites in these Midwest cities show a lower level of participation in heart disease and cancer screening activities. There is a high rate of dropout among current providers of heart disease screening activities and few nonproviders are initiating programs. Program initiation among nonproviders is highest in smoking cessation, weight loss and nutrition. Program growth among current providers is high in the areas of chemical dependency, exercise and personal, home and drivers' safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mullen, PD, Health promotion and patient education benefits for employees.Ann Rev Public Health 9: 305–332, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Terborg, JR: Health promotion at the worksite: A research challenge for personnel and human resources management. In RM Rowland and GM Ferris (Eds.)Research in Personnel & Human Resources Management. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1986, pp. 225–267 (Volume 4).

    Google Scholar 

  3. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Services:Healthy People. The Surgeon General's Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, DHEW (PHS) Publication No. 79-55071, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. US Department of Health and Human Service, Public Health Services:Promoting Health/Preventing Disease: Objectives For The Nation. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office (Reprinted 1984, ONHIC No. F 0009), 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fielding, JE and Piserchia, PV, Frequency of worksite health promotion activities.Am J Public Health 79: 16–90, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion:National Survey of Worksite Health Promotion Activities: A Summary. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1987, ODHP Monograph Series (ONHIC No. M 0005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hollander, RB and Lengermann, JJ, Corporate characteristics and worksite health programs: Survey findings from Fortune 500 companies.Soc Sci Med 5: 491–501, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forouzesh, MR and Ratzker, LE, Health promotion and wellness programs: An insight into the Fortune 500.Health Educ 15: 18–22, 1984–85.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fielding, JE and Breslow, L, Health Promotion Programs sponsored by California employers.Am J Public Health 73: 538–542, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weisbrod, RR, Bracht, NF, Pirie, PL and Mortenson, SV, Health Promotion in Midwest Cities.Public Health Reports, in press.

  11. Haglund, B, Weisbrod, RR and Bracht, NF, Assessing the community. Chapter 4. In NF Bracht (Ed.)Organizing for Community Health Promotion: A Guide. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1990, pp. 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SAS Institute: SAS Version 5 Users Guide: Basics, pp. 945–966; Statistics, pp. 433–506. Cary: SAS Institute, 1985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Rita R. Weisbrod was Research Associate and Project Director; Phyllis Pirie is Associate Professor; Neil F. Bracht is Adjunct Professor of Public Health; Peggy Elstun is Research Assistant; all in the Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Research reported here was supported by grant HL 25523 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weisbrod, R.R., Pirie, P.L., Bracht, N.F. et al. Worksite health promotion in four Midwest cities. J Community Health 16, 169–177 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323975

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323975

Keywords

Navigation