Skip to main content
Log in

Fate of foreign compounds in the environment

  • Research Reports
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behavior of a foreign compound, once introduced into the environment, depends upon the nature of the compound and its interaction with the physical, chemical, and biological components of the ecosystem. It is important to understand the interaction of exogenous compounds with the ecosystem, because only in this way can the potential human health effects of these compounds be predicted. This paper outlines the various parameters that must be considered when predicting the fate of a compound in the environment. An example is then given which relates these factors to the distribution and fate of arsenical compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, AC, Reimers, RS, Abdelghani, AA: Fate of toxic materials in aquatic systems—a testing protocol, in Hemphill, D. D. (Ed.)Trace Substances in Environmental Health—XVII, Columbia, Mo., U. of Missouri, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lyman, WF, Reehl, WF, Rosenblatt, DH:Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods—Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds, New York, McGraw Hill Book Company, 1982. pp 5,1–6,25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casarett, LJ, Doull, J (Eds.):Toxicology, The Basic Science of Poisons, New York, MacMillan, Inc., 1980. pp 632–658.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wood, JM: Biological cycles for toxic elements in the environment.Science,183(4129: 1049–52, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler, GC (Ed.):Principles of Ecotoxicology, Chichester, John Wiley, pp 11–69, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reimers, RS, Englande, AJ: Disposal problems and mitigation techniques for hazardous wastes, for technical workshop on hazardous wastes monitoring for the Texas quality board by enviro-Med laboratories (Ruston, Louisiana), Austin, Texas, 1980.

  7. Crosby, DG, Moilanen, KW, Wong, AS: Environmental generation and degradation of dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans,Environ. Health Perspect.5:259–66, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Felsot, A, and Dahn, PA: Sorption of organophosphoras and carbamate insecticides by Soil.J. Agr. Food Chem.,27: 557–563, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Audus, LJ (Ed.):Herbicides, London Academic Press, pp 77–93, 1976.

  10. Reimers, RS, Anderson, AC: Environmental toxicology-physical-chemical parameters,J. Env. Health 45(6: 288–290, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson, AC: Environmental toxicology—biological parameters,J. Environ. Health 45(5: 231–233, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards, CA:Persistent Pesticides in the Environment, Cleveland, Ohio, CRC, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Academy of Sciences, “Arsenic,” The National Research Council, pp 18, 1977.

  14. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Criteria and Evaluation Division, “Substitute Chemical Program,” Initial Scientific Review of MSMA/DSMA, pp 3–107, 1975.

  15. Abdelghani, AA, Reimers, RS, Anderson, AC, Englande, Jr., AJ, Lo, CP, Shariatpanahi, M:Transport and Distribution of Arsenic in Sediments in Heavy Metals in the Environment, WHO, ECE, pp 665–668, 1981.

  16. Johnson, LR, Hiltbold, AE: “Arsenic Content of Soils and Crops Following Use of MSMA Herbicide,”Proc. Soil Sci. Am., Vol.33 279–282, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson, AC, Abdelghani, AA, Hughes, J, Mason, JW: Accumulation of MSMA in the fruit of the blackberry (Rubus sp),J. Environ. Sci. & Health,B15(3: 247–258, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grover, R, Hance, RJ: Adsorption of some herbicides by soil and roots,Canadian J. of Plant and Sci., Vol.49 pp 378–380, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abdelghani, A, Anderson, A, Englande, AJ, Mason, JW, deKernion, P:Demethylation of MSMA by Soil Microorganisms, Trace Substances in Environmental Health—XI, D. D. Hemphill, ed., University of Missouri (Columbia), pp 419–426, 1977.

  20. Furguson, JF, Gavis, J:A Review of the Arsenic Cycle in Natural Waters, Water Research, Pergamon Press, Vol. 6, Pp 1259–1274, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Woolson, EA: Fate of arsenicals in different environmental substrates,Environ. Health Perspect.,19: 73–81, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lisella, FS et al.: Health aspects of arsenicals in the environment,J. of Env. Health,34(5: 511–519, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ullman, WW, Schaefer, RW: Arsenic Accumulation by fish in lakes treated with sodium arsenite,J.W.P.C.F.,33: 416–418, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Crecelius, EA: Changes in the chemical speciation of arsenic following ingestion by man,Env. Health Perspect.,19: 147–150, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chapman, AC: On the presence of compounds of arsenic in marine crustaceans and shellfish,Analyst,51: 548–563, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hogan, RB, Eagle, H: The pharmacologic basis for the widely varying toxicity of arsenicals,J. Pharmacol. and Exp. Therapeut.,80: 93–113, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Thanks are expressed to the Environmental Trace Substances Research Center, University of Missouri for permission to reproduce the figure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, A.C., Abdelghani, A.A. Fate of foreign compounds in the environment. J Community Health 10, 172–179 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323959

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323959

Keywords

Navigation