Summary
Colonies have been generated from cotyledon protoplasts of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and transferred to solid regeneration medium. The development of these protoplasts was strikingly dependent on their physical environment (liquid or solidified medium) and the nature of the gelling agent (agarose, alginate). In particular, extremely compact multicellular structures developed in agarose solidified medium, similar to those observed in cultures of hypocotyl- and petiole-derived sunflower protoplasts (termed “proembryoids”). A detailed study at the histological level, however, indicates that these structures are degenerative, rather than embryonic in nature. The quality of the colonies, with regard to their regeneration potential, appears to be best in alginate solidified medium.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- MS:
-
medium of Murashige and Skoog (1962)
- NAA:
-
1-naphthaleneacetic acid
- BAP:
-
6-benzylaminopurine
References
Binding H, Nehls R, Kock R, Finger J, Mordhost G (1981) Comparative study on protoplast regeneration in herbaceous species of the Dicotyledoneae class. Z Pflanzenphysiol 101: 119–130
Bohorova NE, Cocking EC, Power JB (1986) Isolation, culture and callus regeneration of protoplasts of wild and cultivatedHelianthus species. Plant Cell Rep 5: 256–258
Burrus M, Chanabé C, Alibert G, Bidney D (1991) Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Cell Rep 10: 161–166
Chanabé C, Burrus M, Bidney D, Alibert G (1991) Studies on plant regeneration from protoplasts in the genusHelianthus. Plant Cell Rep 9: 635–638
Damm B, Willmitzer L (1988) Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of differentArabidopsis thaliana genotypes. Mol Gen Genet 213: 15–20
—, Schmidt R, Willmitzer L (1989) Efficient transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana using direct gene transfer to protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 217: 6–12
Dupuis JM, Péan M, Chagvardieff P (1990) Plant donor tissue and isolation procedure effect on early formation of embryoids from protoplasts ofHelianthus annuus L. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 22: 183–189
Guilley E, Hahne G (1989) Callus formation from isolated sunflower (Helianthus annuus) mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 8: 226–229
Lenée P, Chupeau Y (1986) Isolation and culture of sunflower protoplasts (Helianthus annuus L.): factors influencing the viability of cell colonies derived from protoplasts. Plant Sci 43: 69–75
Moyne AL, Thor V, Pélissier B, Bergounioux C, Freyssinet G, Gadal P (1988) Callus and embryoid formation from protoplasts ofHelianthus annuus. Plant Cell Rep 7: 437–440
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for growth and rapid bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497
Schmitz P, Schnabl H (1989) Regeneration and evacuolation of protoplasts from mesophyll, hypocotyl and petioles fromHelianthus annuus L. J Plant Physiol 135: 223–227
Schnabl H, Youngman RJ (1985) Immobilisation of plant cell protoplasts inhibits enzymatic lipid peroxidation. Plant Sci 40: 65–69
—, Zimmermann U (1983) Maintenance of plant cell membrane integrity and function by the immobilisation of protoplasts in alginate matrices. Planta 158: 392–397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, C., Hahne, G. Structural analysis of colonies derived from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) protoplasts cultured in liquid and semi-solid media. Protoplasma 169, 130–138 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323612
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323612