Skip to main content

A reaction to educational reform: Implications for educational psychologists

Abstract

Issue is taken with Benton and Hoyt's (1990) study of three groups as to their agreement or disagreement with the Holmes Group report Tomorrow's Teachers (1986), and the Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy's Report, A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century (1986). The three groups studied were volunteer respondents from the initial Holmes Group, Division 15 of the American Psychological Association, and the Teacher Education Council for State Colleges and Universities. Questions are raised regarding the Benton and Hoyt study's general assumptions, selection of documents for study, selection of and generalization about group responses, and general implications for all educationists as well as educational psychologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Benton, S. L., and Hoyt, K. B. (1990). Educational reform: Implications for educational psychologist.Educat. Psychol. 2: 203–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy (1986).A National Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century.

  • Holmes Group (1986).Tomorrow's Teacher: A Report of the Holmes Group. The Holmes Group, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, H. (1982).American Graduate Schools of Education, Ford Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983).A Nation at Risk The Imperative for Educational Reform. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnur, J. O., Siders, J. A., and Richmond, M. G. (1987). Outcomes-based teacher education.Act. Teacher Ed. 9: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwebel, M. (1989). The new priorities and the education faculty. In Wisniewski, R., and Ducharme, E. R. (eds.),The Professors of Teaching, University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnur, J.O. A reaction to educational reform: Implications for educational psychologists. Educ Psychol Rev 2, 303–309 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323288

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323288

Key words

  • educational reform
  • educational psychology