Skip to main content
Log in

Educational reform: Implications for educational psychologists

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Holmes Group report, titled Tomorrow's Teachers (1986), and the report of the Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, titled A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century (1986), contain major reform proposals that have implications for educational psychologists. To understand the nature of these proposals, we performed a content analysis of the Holmes and Carnegie documents and constructed a 149-item survey instrument. Three separate mailings were conducted to solicit volunteer respondents from the initial Holmes Group, Division 15 of APA, and the Teacher Education Council of State Colleges and Universities (TECSCU). A principal components analysis with varimax rotation was performed on data collected from 1039 respondents, and three factors were found to underlie the survey instrument: Incremental Changes, Sweeping Changes, and Financial Changes. A multivariate analysis of variance on the three factor scores revealed that the Holmes Group more strongly supported Incremental and Sweeping Changes than did TECSCU respondents, and that Division 15 members more strongly endorsed Sweeping Changes than did TECSCU. Recommendations are made for involving educational psychologists in the reform process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of State Colleges and Universities (1986).To Secure the Blessings of Liberty, a report of the National Commission on the Role and Future of State Colleges and Universities, Washington, D. C.

  • Backman, C. (1986).Positions on Current Issues in Teacher Education, Teacher Education Council of State Colleges and Universities, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. V., and Deal, T. (1975).Managing Change in Educational Organizations, McCutchan, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1988).College: The Undergraduate Experience in America, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation (1988).Teacher Involvement in Decisionmaking: A State-by-State Profile, Washington, D. C.

  • Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy (1986).A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century, Washington, D. C.

  • Carpenter, T. P., and Peterson, P. L. (eds.) (1988). Special issue: Learning mathematics form instruction.Educat. Psychol. 23.

  • Charles, D. C. (1987). The emergence of educational psychology. In Glover, J. A., and Ronning, R. R. (eds.),Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology, Plenum, New York, pp. 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, W. W., Jr., and Pellegrin, R. J. (1973). Barriers to the innovation process: Four case studies of differentiated staffing.Educat. Admin. Q., 9: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1984).Beyond the Commission Reports: The Coming Crisis in Teaching, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., and Wise, A. E. (1983). Teaching standards or standardized teaching?Educat. Leadership 66–69.

  • Dexter, T. F. G., and Garlick, A. H. (1898).Psychology in the Schoolroom, Longmans, Green, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, C. W. (1905).Educational Reform, The Century Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, W. (1987). The Holmes Group report and the professionalization of teaching. In Soltis, J. F. (ed.),Reforming Teacher Education, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, A. (1986). Reforming teacher education: Two critical views of recent Carnegie and Holmes Group reports.Chron. Higher Educat. 39–40.

  • Glover, J. A., and Ronning, R. R. (1987).Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinder, R. E. (1978). What 200 years tell us about professional priorities in educational psychology.Educat. Psychol. 12: 284–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1904).Adolescence, Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1911).Educational Problems, Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, I. B. (1983). Forms of discourse and their possibilities for guiding practice: Towards an effective rhetoric. Curriculum Stud. 15: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henmon, V. A. C. (1913). Educational psychology. In Blond, E. (ed.),Encyclopedia of Education, W & G Gaird, Belfast, pp. 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyns, B. (1988). Educational defectors: A first look at teacher attrition in the NLS-72.Educat. Res. 17: 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Perspectives on educational psychology. In, Glover, J. A., and Ronning, R. R. (eds.),Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology, Plenum, New York, pp. 415–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoetker, J., and Ahlbrand, W. P. (1969). The persistence of the recitation.Am. Educat. Res. J. 6: 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes Group (1986).Tomorrow's Teachers: A Report of the Holmes Group, The Holmes Group, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks, J. E. (1987). Retrospect and prospect in educational psychology. In, Glover, J. A., and Ronning, R. R., (eds.),Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology, Plenum, New York, pp. 425–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, K. B. (1988). An approach to readiness for educational reforms.Educat. Consid. 15: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1899).Talks to Teachers on Psychology and to Students on Some of Life's Ideals, Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazlow, C. (1977). Faculty receptivity to organizational change: A test of two explanations of resistance to innovation in higher education.J. Res. Devel. Educat. 10: 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. O., and Mueller, C. W. (1978).Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. (1986). Reforming teacher education: Two critical views of recent Carnegie and Holmes Group reports.Chron, Higher Educat. 39–40.

  • Levin, J. R., and Pressley, M. (eds.) (1986). Special issue: Learning strategies.Educat Psychol., 21.

  • Lieberman, A. (1987). Teacher leadership. In Soltis, J. F. (ed.),Reforming Teacher Education Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, C. P. (1986). The great teacher talkathon.Educat. Record. 67: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. B. (1987). Holmes group pursues reform agenda.School Admin. 29–34.

  • National Governors' Association (1986).Time for Results, National Governors' Association, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. I., and Collins, J. M. (1978). Barriers and resistance to innovation.Austral. J. Teach. Educat. 3: 2–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L. (1987a). An overview of the Holmes Group.Phi Delta Kappan 619–621.

  • Olson, L. (1988). Carnegie revamps and relocates forum on economy and education.Educat. Week.

  • Olson, L. (1987b). Holmes Group reflects on how to sustain its momentum.Educat. Week.

  • Olson, L. (1986). Many new members of Holmes Group question elements of reform agenda.Educat. Week, 6: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. (chair). (1987). Implications of the Holmes Group reform of teacher education. Paper presentation session conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D. C.

  • Paris, S. G. (ed.) (1987). Special issue: Current issues in reading comprehension.Educat. Psychol. 22.

  • Peng, S. S. (1982). Education attracts fewer academically high achieving young women.Nat. Center Educat. Stat. Bull. 82-249b.

  • President's Commission on Excellence in Education (1983).A Nation at Risk, Washington, D. C.

  • Reid, W. A. (1987). Institutions and practices: Professional education reports and the language of reform.Educat. Res. 16: 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmers, H. H., and Knight, F. B. (1922). The teaching of educational psychology in the United States.J. Educat. Psychol. 13: 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. D., Keith, T. Z., and Page, E. B. (1983). Now who aspires to teach?Educat. Res. 12: 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J. (1987). The impact of the Holmes Group report. In Soltis, J. (ed.),Reforming Teacher Education, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. (1983). Contradictions, ironies and promises unfulfilled: A contemporary account of the status of teaching.Phi Delta Kappan 65: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1913).Educational Psychology, Vols. 1–3, Teachers College, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom, A (1986). The Holmes report: Sophisticated analysis, simplistic solutions.J. Teach. Educat. 36: 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, F. M., Weaver, R., and Landers, M. F. (1989). The identification of factors which influence interdisciplinary collaboration within educational settings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Travers, R. M. W. (1969). Educational psychology. In Ebel, R. L. (ed.),Encyclopedia of Educational Research, 4th ed., Macmillan, New York, pp.413–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, E., and Sacks, S. (1987). Teacher education and the liberal arts. The position of the Consortium for Excellence in Teacher Education, The Consortium, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (1979).Educational Reforms: Experiences and Prospects, UNESCO, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Council for Educational Administration (UCEA) (1987).Leaders for America's Schools, the report of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration, UCEA, Tempe, Arizona.

  • Walker, C. H., and Yekovich, F. R. (eds.) (1987). Draft minutes: Executive Committee Meeting APA Division 15.Newslett. Educat. Psychol. 11: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, R. F., and Punch, K. F. (1987). Teacher receptivity to systemwide change in the implementation stage.Rev. Educat. Res. 57: 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. T. (1983).America's Teacher Quality Problem: Alternatives for Reform, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. T. (1979). In search of quality: The need for talent in teaching.Phi Delta Kappan 61: 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. E. (1989). Graduate preparation of teachers: The debate and beyond. In Woolfolk, A. E. (ed.),Research Perspectives on the Graduate Preparation of Teachers, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benton, S.L., Hoyt, K.B. Educational reform: Implications for educational psychologists. Educ Psychol Rev 2, 203–236 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323279

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323279

Key words

Navigation