Skip to main content
Log in

Health services, health status, and work loss

  • Research Reports
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of workdays lost because of illness, coupled with records of health service utilization patterns, were studied to establish possible links between health status and different forms of prepayment coverage. The records of industrial workers at four branches of the same company were analyzed. Records of employees with broad-benefit coverage were compared with those who had less-comprehensive indemnity coverage. A free choice of providers was available to the study population. Data for workers covered by the broader plans revealed fewer medical admissions to hospitals, more surgical admissions, and more outpatient physician visits. As hypothesized, their numbers of days absent from work were lower. Because few of these results were statistically significant, caution is necessary in their interpretation. Some aspects of the project warranting further consideration are discussed. Data suggest a positive correlation between breadth of health plan coverage and health status, with possible economic benefits to be derived from such coverage. The data also indicate the desirability of additional investigations to be based on employers' and health plan records, that involve other types of populations and other benefit options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Densen PM, Lee SS, Kasey EH (eds): Discussion. InUniversity Medical Programs: Evaluation. DHEW Pub. No. HSM 72-3010. Government Printing Office, 1972. Pp 113–116.

  2. Houten DT, DuBois DM: A trial method for combined end result and process evaluation of health service systems. In Densen PM, Lee SS, Kasey EH (eds.):University Medical Programs: Evaluation. DHEW Pub. No. HSM 72-3010. Government Printing Office, 1972. Pp 55–74.

  3. Gellman DD: The price of progress: Technology and the cost of medical care.Can Med Assoc J 104:401–406, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. White KL: Evaluation of medical education and health care. In Lathem W, Newburg A (eds):Community Medicine. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970. Pp 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs VR: The contribution of health services to the American economy.Milbank Mem Fund Q 44:65–103, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fein R: On measuring economic benefits of health programs. InMedical History and Medical Care. London, Oxford University Press, 1971. Pp 181–217.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson RL: Issues in measuring the economic effects of personal health services.Med Care 5:362–368, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson RL: Economic effects of personal health services: Work loss in a public school teacher population.Am J Public Health 61:30–45, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson RL: Comparative medical care use under prepaid group practice and free choice plans: A case study.Inquiry 9:70–76, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grosse RN: Cost-benefit analysis of health services.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 399:89–99, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menz FC: Economics of disease prevention: Infectious kidney disease.Inquiry 8:3–18, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klarman HE:The Economics of Health. New York, Columbia University Press, 1965. Pp 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Silver M: An economic analysis of variations in medical expenses and work-loss rates. In Klarman HE (ed):Empirical Studies in Health Economics. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1970. Pp 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sullivan DF:Conceptual Problems in Developing an Index of Health. PHS Pub. No. 1000, Series 2, No. 17. Washington, DC, Public Health Service, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sullivan DF:Disability Components for an Index of Health. PHS Pub. No. 1000, Series 2, No. 42. Rockville, Md, Public Health Service, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roemer MI: Evaluation of health service programs and levels of measurement.HSMHA Health Reports 86:839–848, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goldsmith SB: The status of health status indicators.HSMHA Health Reports 87:212–220, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moriyama IM: Problems in the measurement of health status. In Sheldon EB, Moore WE (eds):Indicators of Social Change. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1968. Pp 573–600.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sanders BS: Measuring community health levels.Am J Public Health 54:1063–1070, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michael JM, et al: A basic information system for health planning.Public Health Rep 83:21–28, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare:Toward a Social Report. Government Printing Office, 1969.

  22. Taeuber KE: Review of Department of Health, Education, and Welfare:Toward a Social Report.J Human Resources 5:354–360, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bickner RE: Measurements and indices of health. In Hopkins CE (ed):Methodology of Identifying, Measuring and Evaluating Outcomes of Health Service Programs, Systems and Subsystems. Government Printing Office, 1969. Pp 133–149.

  24. Lerner M: The level of physical health of the poverty population.Med Care 6:355–367, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Auster R, Leveson I, Surachek D: The production of health, an exploratory study.J Human Resources 4:411–436, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stewart CT: Allocation of resources to health.J Human Resources 6:103–122, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shapiro S, Fink R, Rosenberg C: A program to measure the impact of multiphasic health testing on health differentials between poverty and nonpoverty groups.Med Care 10:207–214, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplan RS, Lave LB, Leinhardt S: The efficacy of a comprehensive health care project-an empirical analysis.Am J Public Health 62:924–930, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare:Disability Days: United States—July 1965—June 1966. PHS Pub. No. 1000, Series 10, No. 47. Washington, DC, Public Health Service, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smith DJ: Absenteeism and “presenteeism” in industry.Arch Environ Health 21:670–677, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith DJ: Absenteeism in industry.Ill Med J 129:225–229, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Enterline PE: Social causes of sick absence.Arc Environ Health 12:467–472, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wolfe H: A technique for assessing attrition, absenteeism and lateness among nursing personnel.Health Serv Res 2:140–153, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  34. McCaffree KM: The economic basis for the development of community health programs.Med Care 6:286–299, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shapiro S: End result measurements of quality of medical care.Milbank Mem Fund Q 45:7–30, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yett DE, et al:Determination of Economic Attributes of Community Health Profiles and Health Indices. Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Human Resources Study Center, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fein R: Health programs and economic development. InThe Economics of Health and Medical Care. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, 1964. Pp. 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weisbrod BA, Andreano RL, Baldwin RE, et al:Disease and Economic Development. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leveson I, Ullman D, Wassall G: Effects of health on education and productivity.Inquiry 6:3–11, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Glasser JH: A stochastic model for industrial illness absenteeism.Am J Public Health 60:1936–1444, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gault FC (retired Director of Employee Benefits of the Weyerhaeuser Co.): Personal communication to the author, July 26, 1972.

  42. Gerber A, Robertson RL: Letters to the Editor.Am J Public Health 61:901–903, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Newhouse JP: Determinants of days lost from work due to sickness. In Klarman HE (ed):Empirical Studies in Health Economics. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1970. Pp 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Reed LS, Carr W: Private health insurance in the United States, 1967.Social Security Bulletin 32:4, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Leontief W: Theoretical assumptions and nonobserved facts.Am Econ Rev 61:1–7, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fuchs VR, Grossman M: The correlation between health and schooling. Unpublished, undated paper.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Robertson is Professor of Economics, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts 01075. Part of this work was done while the author was a Senior Associate at the Harvard Center for Community Health and Medical Care. Rashi Fein and John Rapoport reviewed an earlier draft; computational assistance was provided by Janice Robertson. Robert Prouty, M.D., classified surgical procedures. The author particularly wishes to express gratitude to two persons whose efforts were essential to the study: Fremont C. Gault, retired Director of Employee Benefits, the Weyerhaeuser Company, and Sally Gunderson, medical records specialist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robertson, R.L. Health services, health status, and work loss. J Community Health 1, 175–187 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323108

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323108

Keywords

Navigation