Skip to main content
Log in

Signifying harassment: Communication, ambiguity and power

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay reports on phenomenological research conducted with people who describe having been harassed, having been accused of harassment, and/or having mediated or adjudicated harassment disputes. The authors review recent legal conceptions of sexual harassment and articulate a methodology for analyzing individual narrative accounts. The analysis of six selected interviews (three alleged harassers and three declared harassees) depicts how, through discourse with others, persons in ambiguous cases of harassment come to perceive themselves as harassers or harasseesgradually, how intention is inferred from conductcontingently, and how perceptions and expressions are often reified as certainties in the effort to secure some sense of justiceinstitutionally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others.Cultural Critique 20: 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D.D., Terpstra, D.E. and Cutler, B.D. (1990). Perceptions of sexual harassment: A re-examination of gender differences.The Journal of Psychology 124: 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, E. (1989). Sexual harassment: A continuing source of litigation in the workplace.American Journal of Community Psychology 17: 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, J. (1987).Radical hermeneutics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, B.G. (1987). World and/or sign: Toward a semiotic phenomenology of the modern life-world.Human Studies 10: 311–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1973).Speech and phenomena: And other essays on Husserl's theory of signs. Trans. D.B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1992).Interpretation and overinterpretation. Ed. S. Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (1992).Truth and method. Trans. J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, M., Grierson, R.D. and Linder, B.C. (1991). A communication perspective on sexual harassment: Affiliative nonverbal behaviors in asynchronous relationships.Communication Quarterly 39(2): 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jazchik, M.L. and Fretz, B.R. (1991). Women's perceptions and labeling of sexual harassment.Sex roles 25: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G. (1993). Sexual Harassment: Communication implications. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1984).Revolution in poetic language. Trans. Margaret Waller. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and hermeneutical mode of understanding.Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 14(2): 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R.L. (1988).Phenomenology of communication: Merleau-Ponty's thematics in communicology and semiology. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R.L. (1992).The human science of communicology. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.F. (1988).The differend: Phrases in dispute. Trans. Georges Van Den Abbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.F. and Thebaud, J.L. (1989).Just gaming. Trans. W. Godzich. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.F. (1990).Phenomenology. Trans. B. Beakley. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C.A. (1979).Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J.M. (1993). The gender of harassment. A paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Miami, Florida.

  • Martinez, J.M. (in press). Speaking as a ‘Chicana’: Tracing cultural identity through silence and betrayal. In B. Samore (Ed.),Divided language, divided selves. San Jose, CA: Chusma Press.

  • Mazer, D.B. and Percival, E.F. (1989). Ideology or experience? The relationships among perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of sexual harassment in university students.Sex Roles 20: 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty (1964).Signs. Trans. R.C. McCleary. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty (1968).The visible and the invisible. Ed. C. Lefort. Trans. A. Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1986).Phenomenology of perception. Trans. C. Smith. Trans. revisions F. Williams and D. Guerriere. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paludi, M.A. and Barickman, R.B. (1991).Academic and workplace sexual harassment: A resource manual. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reusch, J. and Bateson, G. (1968).Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1975). Phenomenology and the social sciences.The Annals of Phenomenological Psychology: 145–159.

  • Sargeant, G. (1991). Sexual harassment cases still murky.Trial 27: 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seal, F.E., Johnson, C.D. and Weber, N. (1989). Friendly or sexy? It may depend on whom you ask.Psychology of Women Quarterly 13: 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.R. (1991). The Hill-Thomas dispute: Lyotard and the obligations for linkage. Paper presented to the meeting of the Semiotic Society of America. College Park: University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.R. (1993). Phenomenology of intercultural communication. In P. Blosser, E. Shimonmisse, L. Embree, and H. Kojima (Eds.),Japanese and Western phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.R. (1994). Phrasing, linking, judging: Communication and critical phenomenology.Human Studies 17: 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.R. (in press). Simple signs, indeterminate events: Lyotard on sophists and semiotics. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.Beyond the Symbol Model.

  • Smith, A.R. and Shyles, L. (1994). On ethnocentric truth and pragmatic justice. In L. Langsdorf and A.R. Smith (Eds.),Recovering pragmatism's voice: The classical tradition, Rorty, and the philosophy of communication. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatel, D.S. and Mineberg, E.M. (1986). Supreme court decision broadens definition of employment-related sexual harassment.Public Management 68: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D.E. and Baker, D.D. (1990). A hierarchy of sexual harassment.The Journal of Psychology 121: 599–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, R. (1987). Emergent themes: The researcher's experience.Phenomenology and Pedagogy 5(3): 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1990).Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, E. (Ed.). (1992).Sexual harassment: Confrontations and Decisions. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S.J. (1986). The nature of interviewing.Phenomenology and Pedagogy 4(2): 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, K.R. (1991). Ladies, flirts, and tomboys: Strategies for managing sexual harassment in an underground coal mine.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 19: 390–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Many people have been involved with this project since its inception, and most wish to remain anonymous. We would like to thank all participants, colleagues, students, and critics for their contributions and expressions of interest. We would especially like to acknowledge Thomas Pace and Richard Lanigan for their teaching, friendship and support, and Frances Chaput Waksler for her helpful comments. An earlier version of this paper was presented to The Society for Phenomenology and the Human Sciences, Boston MA, USA, October 1992.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, A.R., Martinez, J.M. Signifying harassment: Communication, ambiguity and power. Hum Stud 18, 63–87 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322840

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322840

Keywords

Navigation