Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond educational psychology: Steps toward an educational semiotic

  • Special Section On Educational Semiotics
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that educational psychology is deeply embedded in an objectivist epistemology, the consequences of which seriously undermine our ability to inform educational practice. In the remainder of the paper, I provide an introduction to semiotics, the doctrine of signs, and offer four global concepts (the sign, semiosis, inference, and reflexivity) that I believe set semiotics apart from other, more or less related, approaches within psychology and educational psychology (e.g., constructivism). I conclude the paper by responding to some of the more frequently asked questions I have encountered in attempting to define an educational semiotic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M., Deely, J., Krampen, M., Ransdell, J., Sebeok, T., and von Uexkull, T. (1984). A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps toward a new paradigm.Semiotica 52: 7–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1964).Elements of Semiology (Translated by Annette Lavers and Colin Smith), Hill and Wang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972).Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Ballentine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., and Tarule, J. (1986).Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouissac, P., Herzfeld, M., and Posner, R. (eds.) (1986).Iconicity, Stauffenburg-Verlag, Tubingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Hasselbring, T., Kinser, C., and Williams, S. Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix and R. Spiro (eds.),Advances in Computer-Video Technology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. In press.

  • Brown, J., Collins, A., and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educ. Res. 18: 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchler, J. (ed.) (1955).Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945). As we may think.Atl. Month. 176: 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J., and Newman, S. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick (ed.),Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. In press.

  • Culler, J. (1988).Framing the Sign, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. (1990). Fostering Post-Structuralist Thinking. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

  • Cunningham, D. (1987). Outline of an education semiotic.Am. J. Semiotics 5: 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. (1989). Abduction and affordance: J. J. Gibson and theories of semiosis. In T. Prewitt, J. Deely, and K. Haworth (eds.),Semiotics 1988, University Press of America, New York, pp. 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. (1991). Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue.Educ. Technol. 31(5): 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. Semiotic aspects of pedagogy. In R. Posner (ed.),Handbook of Semiotics, Walter De Gruyter, Berlin. In press.

  • Cunningham, D., and Shank, G. (1984). Semiotics: A new foundation for education?Contemp. Educ. Rev. 3: 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D., and Shank, G. (1989).Semiotics, a Short Course. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.

  • Deely, J. (1982).Introducing Semiotic, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (1986). The coalescence of semiotic consciousness. In J. Deely, B. Williams, and F. Kruse (eds.).Frontiers of Semiotics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, pp. 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (1990).Basics of Semiotics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J., Williams, B., and Kruse, F. (eds.) (1986).Frontiers of Semiotics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1984). Languages and the institutions of philosophy.Res. Semiot./Semiot. Inq. 4: 91–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T., and Knuth, R. (1990). Hypermedia and instruction: Where's the match? In D. Jonassen and H. Mandl (eds.),Designing Hypermedia for Learning. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1976).A Theory of Semiotic, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1979).The Role of the Reader, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1983).The Name of the Rose (Translated by William Weaver), Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1984).Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J. (1982).Introduction to Communication Studies, Methuen, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970).The Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Herder and Herder, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983).Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985).The Mind's New Science, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, T. (1977).Structuralism and Semiotics, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1960). The representation of nature in contemporary physics. In Rollo May (ed.),Symbolism in Religion and Literature, George Braziller, New York, pp. 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, N. (1987). Toward a Peircean semiotic theory of learning.Am. J. Semiot. 5: 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. (ed.) (1983).Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (1986).The Practice of Teaching, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.),Style in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 350–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, M. (1981). Phytosemiotics.Semiotica 36: 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, M. (1986). Developmental semiotics. InEncyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Mouton, Berlin and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987).Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landow, G. (1989). Hypertext in literary education, criticism, and scholarship.Comp. Human. 23: 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempke, J. (1984).Semiotics and Education, Semiotic Circle, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempke, J. (1987). Social semiotics and science education.Am. J. Semiot. 5: 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1966).The Savage Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. (1988). Work or learning: Implications of classroom metaphors.Educ. Res. 17: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1983).Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition, Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertz, E., and Parmenter, R. (eds.) (1985).Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. (1946).Signs, Language and Behavior, Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (1984).Dialogue as Semiosis: Paulo Freire's Adult Literacy Program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Semiotic Society of America, Bloomington, Indiana.

  • O'Loughlin, M. (1990).Teachers' Ways of Knowing: A Journal Study of Teacher Learning in a Dialogical and Constructivist Learning Environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

  • Perry, W. (1970).Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme Holt, Reinhart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. (1990).Collaboration and Constructivism in the Science Classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

  • Saussure, F. de (1959).Course in General Linguistics Philosophical Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983).The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (1963). Communication in animals and men.Language 39: 448–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (1976).Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs Peter de Ridder Press, Lisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (1979).The Sign and Its Masters University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (1981).The Play of Musement Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (1986).I Think I am a Verb Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T., Lamb, S., and Regan, J. (1987).Semiotics in Education: A Dialogue. College Press, Clairmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, G. (1987). Abductive strategies in educational research.Am. J. Semiot. 5: 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, G. (1988). Three into two will go: Juxtapositional strategies for empirical research in semiotics. In J. Deely (ed.),Semiotics 1987 University Press of America, New York, pp. 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, G. (1989).The Impact of Semiotics on Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Siegel, M., and Carey, R. (1989).Critical Thinking: A Semiotic Perspective ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1988).The Signs of Our Time Jeremy P. Tarcher, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R., and Cunningham, D. (1990).Semiosic Relativity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Semiotic Society of America, Norman, Oklahoma.

  • Suhor, C. (1984). Toward a semiotics-based curriculum.J. Curric. Stud. 16: 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (1985).Educational Semiotics: A Timely Reminder. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Thomas, D. (1987). Semiotics: The pattern which connects.Am. J. Semiot. 5: 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexkull, J. (1982). The theory of meaning.Semiotica 42: 25–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978).Mind in Society Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, D.J. Beyond educational psychology: Steps toward an educational semiotic. Educ Psychol Rev 4, 165–194 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322343

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322343

Key words

Navigation