Skip to main content
Log in

Age and Pap smear history as a basis for intervention strategy

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a means of developing effective intervention strategies for promoting Pap smear screening, we analyzed data from a population-based women's health survey (N=603) in a 36-county area in southeastern Kentucky. The cervical cancer mortality rate for white women in this area is one of the highest in the United States. By using selected sociodemographic, health-care utilization, health knowledge, and health behavior variables in age-specific logistic regression models, we discriminated between women who had had a Pap smear within 3.5 years and those who had not. Several variables predicted Pap screening status regardless of the woman's age. Women of all age groups who had not been recently screened had encounters with the medical-care system. A key variable that affected use of screening services was ever use of birth control pills. The main differences between the three age groups were as follows: the 18–44 age group was less likely to see a private physician and less likely to seek medical care of any type, except for care related to pregnancy; only the 45–59 age group believed that cost of medical care was a problem; and only for the 60 or older age group were socioeconomic variables associated with not having recently had a Pap test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellwein LB. Detection of uterine cervical cancer. In L. Breslow (Ed.)A History of Cancer Control in the United States. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, 1978, DHEW publication no. (NIH) 79-1518.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baquet C, Ringen K, Pollack E, et al:Cancer Among Blacks and Other Minorities: Statistical Profiles. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, 1986, NIS publication no. 86-2785.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guzick DS. Efficacy of screening for cervical cancer: a review.Am J Public Health 68:125, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark EA, Anderson TW. Does screening by “Pap” smears help prevent cervical cancer?Lancet 2:1, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Macgregor JE, Moss SM, Parkin DM, et al. A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in northeast Scotland.Br Med J 290:1543, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greenwald P, Sondik EJ (Eds.)Cancer Control Objectives for the Nation: 1985–2000. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, 1986, NCI Monograph no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sondik, E, Young JL, Horm JW, Ries LAG.Annual Cancer Statistics Review. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, 1987, NIH publication no. 87-2789.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Devesa SS. Descriptive epidemiology of cancer of the uterine cervix.Obstet Gynecol 63:605–12, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spurlock CW. Site-specific cancer mortality among Kentucky residents, 1971–1985.J Ky Med Assoc 86:67–72, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control. Black-white differences in cervical cancer mortality—United States, 1980–1987.MMWR 39:247, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hinds MW, Skaggs JW, Hernandez C. Cervical cancer mortality trends in Kentucky, 1971–83.J Ky Med Assoc 83:186–92, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Centers for Disease Control. Screening for cervical and breast cancer–southeastern Kentucky.MMWR 36:845–49, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kish LA. A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household.J Am Stat Assoc 44:380–87, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McManmon EP, Nadel M. Validating self-reported cervical screening practices from a population-based health survey. Presented at the 118th American Public Health Association Meeting; October 1, 1991; New York, NY.

  15. American Cancer Society. Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: recommendations and rationale.CA 30:194–240, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Celentano DD, Klassen AC, Weisman CS, Rosenshein NB. Cervical cancer screening practices among older women: results from the Maryland cervical cancer case-control study.J Clin Epidemiol 41:531–41, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christopherson W, Parker J. Control of cervix cancer in women of low income in a community.Cancer 24:64–89, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SUGI Supplemental Library User's Guide, Version 5 Edition. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, 1985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Carl Spurlock is planning and research advisor, Division of Epidemiology, Kentucky Department for Health Services. Marion Nadel is an epidemiologist, Division of Chronic Disease Control and Community Intervention, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control. Edward McManmon is project director, Barabdos Eye Study, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spurlock, C., Nadel, M. & McManmon, E. Age and Pap smear history as a basis for intervention strategy. J Community Health 17, 97–107 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321578

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321578

Keywords

Navigation