Skip to main content
Log in

A review of over-the-counter drug therapy

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors review the extent of the use of nonprescription drugs as well as possible variables influencing such consumption. Various studies indicate that age, sex, personality characteristics, perceptions of health status, socioeconomic factors, parental example, and pharmacists all play parts in determining over-the-counter (OTC) drug utilization. Several sources express concern about the inaccessibility of accurate OTC drug information to the consumer. Indeed, even the FDA has occasional difficulty obtaining reliable facts on both the numbers and formulae of such products. Several studies indicate that consumers acquire information about their home remedies through advertising, friends and relatives, physicians, pharmacists, and product labels. By far the most influential of these is advertising, and much concern has been voiced over consumers' unquestioning faith in drug ads. Examples are cited of deceptive, inaccurate, and unfair advertising practices used by some OTC drug manufacturers. The pros and cons of the “drug-oriented society” theory are discussed, including an analysis of its underlying origins. Testing of the safety and efficacy of non-rescription remedies has proved to be controversial, especially when considering the ramifications of the placebo effect. Different surveys report widespread misuse of OTCs by consumers through overuse, taking several drugs concurrently, and using home remedies to treat potentially serious diseases.

The fact that life is a multi-faceted process, that pain, sorrow, discouragement, and tension are as much a part of life as joy, peace, and pleasure, has been lost on many of the older generation as well as on the adolescents of today. The fact that a sleepless night may produce an important insight into one's self, or the nature of the universe, or that several days of depression can be a growth-inducing experience, seems to be lost on too many of us.

—G.K. Piorkowski

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fry J: The medical aspect of home medication and its advantages to the general practitioner.WFPMM 1st General Assembly Report. London, 1971. Pp 19–21.

  2. Knapp DA, Knapp D: Decision-making and self-medication: Preliminary findings.Am J Hosp Pharm 29 1004–1012, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson RE, et al: Reported use of nonprescribed drugs in health maintenance.Am J Hosp Pharm 33 1249–1254, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Silverman M, Lee PR:Pills, Profits and Politics. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1974. Pp 206–233, 276–278.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Size and Shape of the Medical Care Dollar, 1969. Washington, DC, Social Security Administration, 1970.

  6. Prescription Drug Data Summary. Social Security Administration, DHEW Publication No SSA 73-11900, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Illich I: Medical nemesis.Lancet 1918–921, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kohn R, White KL:Health Care—An International Study. London, Oxford University Press, 1976. Pp 223–276.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sorensen A, Roghmann K: Use of over-the-counter and prescription drugs among pre-school children. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, 1976.

  10. Ziff R: Psychographics for market segmentation.J Adver Res 11 3–9, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blum RH: Normal drug use. In RH Blum et al (eds):Society and Drugs. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1969. Pp 245–275.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis CE, Lewis MA: The impact of television commercials on health-related beliefs and behaviors of children.Pediatrics 53 431–435, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Knapp DE, Knapp DA, Oeltjen P: OTC decision-making: Using a nonprescription drug for the first time.Med Marketing and Media 1026, 28–29, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Griffenhagen G: Is self-medication emerging from the dark ages?Trial 12 26, 29–30, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bicket WJ: Statement of the American Pharmaceutical Association to the Monopoly Subcommittee of the Senate Small Business Committee of the United States Senate. 92nd Congress, 1st Session, 1971. Pp 468–473.

  16. Kuriansky JB: TV advertising and abuse of OTC drugs. New York, Subcommittee on Drugs and Other Toxic Substances, New York Scientists' Committee for Public Information, 1975 (Mimeographed).

  17. Angevine E: The concerned consumer.J AM Pharm Assoc 12 356–357, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Food and Drug Administration:Consumer Attitudes Toward Over-the-Counter Drug Labels. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, PB-254259: 10–11, 16.

  19. Food and Drug Administration:Consumers and Medication. National Technical Information Service, Department of Commerce, May 1974.

  20. A Study of Health Practices and Opinions. Philadelphia, National Analysts, 1972. P 140.

  21. Gaines J: Some possible psychological dynamics of consumer health misconceptions.J Sch Health 38 489–493, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hodes B: Nonprescription drugs: An overview.Int J Health Serv 4 125–130, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith FA, et al: Health information during a week of television.N Engl J Med 286 516–520, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson B, et al: Television advertising and drug use.Am J Public Health 66 975–978, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis DC: Advertising of proprietary medicines. Statement in the U.S. Senate 2: 769–780, July 22, 1971.

  26. McEwen WJ, Hanneman GJ: The depiction of drug use in television programming.J Drug Educ 4 281–293, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A new breed of consumers will be calling the turn.U.S. News and World Report 79: 19–20, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Piorkowski GK: Drug education at its best—The shaping of values and anti-drug attitudes.J Drug Educ 3 31–37, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Busching BC, Bromley DG: Sources of non-medicinal drug use: A test of the drug-oriented society explanation.J Health Soc Behav 16 50–62, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zwardling D: Non-prescription drugs—The ultimate confidence game.New Times 7 36, 38–40, 42, 44–45, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koenig P: Lee's bilious pills: The placebo effect in patent medicine.Psychol Today 7 60, 61, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  32. A Position Paper. Washington, DC, Proprietary Association, October 1, 1971.

  33. Moxley JH III, Yingling GL, Edwards CC: The Food and Drug Administration's O-T-C drug review: Why review OTC drugs?Fed Proc 32 1435–1437, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lamy PP, Kitler ME: Untoward effects of drugs, part I.Dis Nerv Syst 32 17–23, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Penna RP: Advertising of proprietary medicines. Statement in U.S. Senate 1: 360–370, June 16, 1971.

  36. AMA Drug Evaluations. Chicago, American Medical Association, Council on Drugs, 1971.

  37. A Study of Health Practices and Opinions. National Analysts, Inc., FDA-PA 72-01, FDA-66-193, Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, PB-210 978, 1972. P 64.

  38. Dangerous food and drugs—behind the furor. Interview with Alexander Schmidt.U.S. News and World Report 80 52–55, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Ms. Esmay is a Research Associate and Dr. Wertheimer is Professor in the College of Pharmacy of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455.

Grateful appreciation is expressed to Ms. Noreen Suntrup for her aid in the preparation of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esmay, J.B., Wertheimer, A.I. A review of over-the-counter drug therapy. J Community Health 5, 54–66 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321571

Keywords

Navigation