Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 309–330 | Cite as

Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice

  • Frank N. Dempster
Article

Abstract

There is considerable evidence, gathered in a variety of settings and across many different types of materials and procedures, that spaced repetitions—regardless of whether they are in the form of additional study opportunities or successful tests—are a highly effective means of promoting learning. Research on spacing effects is reviewed and its theoretical and educational implications are examined. It is concluded that spacing effects can best be understood in terms of the “accessibility” hypothesis, and that spaced repetitions have considerable potential for improving classroom learning.

Key words

memory practice learning cognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., and Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 8: 463–470.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C., and Biddle, W. B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In Bower, G. H. (ed.),The Psychology of Language and Motivation (Vol. 9), New York, Academic Press, pp. 90–132.Google Scholar
  3. Armbruster, B. B., and Anderson, T. H. (1984). Structures of explanation in history textbooks or so what if Governor Stanford missed the spike and hit the rail?J. Curric. Studies 16: 181–194.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, S. D. M. (1921). A study in logical memory.Am. J. Psychol. 32: 370–403.Google Scholar
  5. Ausubel, D. P. (1966). Early versus delayed review in meaningful learning.Psychol. Schools 3: 195–198.Google Scholar
  6. Baddeley, A. D. (1976).The Psychology of Memory. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bahrick, H. P., and Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years.J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 13: 344–349.Google Scholar
  8. Bjork, R. A. (1979). Information-processing analysis of college teaching.Educat. Psychol. 14: 15–23.Google Scholar
  9. Bjork, R. A., and Allen, T. W. (1970). The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding?J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 567–572.Google Scholar
  10. Bower, G. H. (1972). Stimulus-sampling theory of encoding variability. In Melton, A. W., and Martin, E. (Eds.),Coding in Human Memory New York, Winston & Sons, pp. 85–124.Google Scholar
  11. Brainerd, C. J., Kingma, J., and Howe, M. L. (1985). On the development of forgetting.Child Devel. 56: 1103–1119.Google Scholar
  12. Bruning, R. H. (1968). Effects of review and testlike events within the learning of prose material.J. Educat. Psychol. 59: 16–19.Google Scholar
  13. Burns, P. C. (1970). Intensive review as a procedure in teaching arithmetic.Elem. School J. 60: 205–211.Google Scholar
  14. Burry, J., Catteral, J., Choppin, B., and Dorr-Bremme, D. (1982). Testing in the nation's schools and districts: How much? What kinds? To what ends? At what costs? (CSE report no. 194). Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.Google Scholar
  15. Cornell, E. H. (1980). Distributed study facilitates infants' delayed recognition memory.Mem. Cognit. 8: 539–542.Google Scholar
  16. Dearborn, W. F. (1910). Experiments in learning.J. Educat. Psychol. 1: 373–388.Google Scholar
  17. Dellarosa, D., and Bourne, L. E. (1985). Surface form and the spacing effect.Mem. Cognit. 13: 529–537.Google Scholar
  18. Dempster, F. N. (1986). Spacing effects in text recall: An extrapolation from the laboratory to the classroom (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  19. Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning.J. Educat. Psychol. 79: 162–170.Google Scholar
  20. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research.Am. Psychol. 43: 627–634.Google Scholar
  21. Dempster, F. N. (1989). Do sentence contexts facilitate vocabulary learning? Additional comparisons (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  22. Donaldson, W. (1970). Output effects in multitrial free recall.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 10: 577–585.Google Scholar
  23. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885).Memory (translated by H. A. Ruger and C. E. Bussenius). New York, Teachers College, 1913. Paperback ed., New York, Dover, 1964.Google Scholar
  24. Elmes, D. G., Dye, C. J., and Herdelin, N. J. (1983). What is the role of affect in the spacing effect?Mem. Cognit. 11: 144–151.Google Scholar
  25. Elmes, D. G., Greener, W. I., and Wilkinson, W. C. (1972). Free recall of items presented after massed- and distributed-practice items.Am. J. Psychol. 85: 237–240.Google Scholar
  26. English, H. B., Wellborn, E. L., and Killian, C. D. (1934). Studies in substance memorization.J. Gen. Psychol. 11: 233–260.Google Scholar
  27. Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing.Arch. Psychol. 6: 1–104.Google Scholar
  28. Gay, L. R. (1973). Temporal position of reviews and its effect on the retention of mathematical rules.J. Educat. Psychol. 64: 171–182.Google Scholar
  29. Glanzer, M., and Duarte, A. (1971). Repetition between and within languages in free recall.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 10: 625–630.Google Scholar
  30. Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.Mem. Cognit. 7: 95–112.Google Scholar
  31. Glenberg, A. M., and Lehmann, T. S. (1980). Spacing repetitions over 1 week.Mem. Cognit. 8: 528–538.Google Scholar
  32. Glenberg, A. M., and Smith, S. M. (1981). Spacing repetitions and solving problems are not the same.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 20: 110–119.Google Scholar
  33. Glover, J. A., and Corkill, A. J. (1987). Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect.J. Educat. Psychol. 79: 198–199.Google Scholar
  34. Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E., and Otto, J. (1987). Enhanced face recognition memory after distributed viewing. Presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  35. Good, T. L., and Brophy, J. E. (1986).Educational Psychology (3rd ed.). New York, Longman.Google Scholar
  36. Good, T. L., and Grouws, D. A. (1979). The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project.J. Educat. Psychol. 71: 355–362.Google Scholar
  37. Gordon, K. (1925). Class results with spaced and unspaced memorizing.J. Exper. Psychol. 8: 337–343.Google Scholar
  38. Greeno, J. G. (1970). Conservation of information-processing capacity in paired-associate memorizing.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 581–586.Google Scholar
  39. Halff, H. M. (1977). The role of opportunities for recall in learning to retrieve.Am. J. Psychol. 90: 383–406.Google Scholar
  40. Hilgard, E. R., and Bower, G. H. (1975).Theories of Learning (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In Solso, R. L. (ed.).Theories in Cognitive Psychology: The Loyola Symposium Potomac, Maryland, Erlbaum, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar
  42. Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In Bower, G. H. (ed.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 10), New York, Academic Press, pp. 47–91.Google Scholar
  43. Hintzman, D. L., and Rogers, M. K. (1973). Spacing effects in picture memory.Mem. Cognit. 1: 430–434.Google Scholar
  44. Hintzman, D. L., Summers, J. J., and Block, R. A. (1975). What causes the spacing effect? Some effects of repetition, duration, and spacing on memory for pictures.Mem. Cognit. xx: 287–294.Google Scholar
  45. Hogan, R. M., and Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 10: 562–567.Google Scholar
  46. Izawa, C. (1971). The test trial potentiating model.J. Math. Psychol. 8: 200–224.Google Scholar
  47. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 17: 649–667.Google Scholar
  48. Jones, H. E. (1923–1924). The effects of examination on permanence of learning.Arch. Psychol. 10: 21–70.Google Scholar
  49. Kim, E. C., and Kellough, R. D. (1987).A Resource Guide for Secondary School Teaching (4th ed.). New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Kraft, R. M., and Jenkins, J. J. (1981). The lag effect with aurally presented passages.Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 17: 132–134.Google Scholar
  51. Kuhs, T., Porter, A., Floden, R., Freeman, D., Schmidt, W., and Schwille, J. (1985). Differences among teachers in their use of curriculum-embedded tests.Elem. School J. 86: 141–152.Google Scholar
  52. Lachman, R., and Laughery, K. L. (1968). Is a test trial a training trial in free recall learning?J. Exper. Psychol. 76: 40–50.Google Scholar
  53. Landauer, T. K. (1969). Reinforcement as consolidation.Psychol. Rev. 76: 82–96.Google Scholar
  54. Landauer, T. K., and Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., and Sykes, R. N. (eds.),Practical Aspects of Memory New York, Academic Press, pp. 625–632.Google Scholar
  55. Lyon, D. O. (1914). The relation of length of material to time taken for learning and the optimum distribution of time.J. Educat. Psychol. 5: 85–91, 155–163.Google Scholar
  56. Magliero, A. (1983). Pupil dilations following pairs of identical words and related to-be-remembered words.Mem. Cognit. 11: 609–615.Google Scholar
  57. Martin, E. (1972). Stimulus encoding in learning and transfer. In Meltin, A. W., and Martin, E. (eds.),Coding Processes in Human Memory Washington, D.C., Winston, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
  58. MasKarinec, A. S., and Thompson, C. P. (1976). The within list distributed practice effect: Tests of the varied context and varied encoding hypotheses.Mem. Cognit. 4: 741–746.Google Scholar
  59. Mayer, R. E. (1987).Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach. Boston, Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  60. McDaniel, M. A., and Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representation through retrieval.J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 11: 371–385.Google Scholar
  61. McDermott, P. A., and Watkins, M. W. (1983). Computerized vs. conventional remedial instruction for learning disabled pupils.J. Special Ed. 17: 81–88.Google Scholar
  62. McGaw, B., and Grotelueschen, A. (1972). Direction of the effect of questions in prose material.J. Educat. Psychol. 63: 586–588.Google Scholar
  63. McGeoch, J. A. (1943).The Psychology of Human Learning. New York, Longmans Green.Google Scholar
  64. Melton, A. W. (1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 596–606.Google Scholar
  65. Modigliani, V. (1976). Effects on a later recall by delaying initial recall.J. Exper. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 2: 609–622.Google Scholar
  66. Moscovitch, M. (1984).Infant Memory. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  67. Murdock, B. B., Jr., and Babick, A. J. (1961). The effect of repetition on the retention of individual words.J. Psychol. 74: 596–601.Google Scholar
  68. Nungester, R. J., and Duchastel, P. C. (1982). Testing versus review: Effects on retention.J. Educat. Psychol. 74: 18–22.Google Scholar
  69. Ornstein, P. A., and Naus, M. J. (1978). Rehearsal processes in children's memory. In Ornstein, P. A. (ed.),Memory Development in Children Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum, pp. 69–99.Google Scholar
  70. Perkins, N. L. (1914). The value of distributed repetitions in rote learning.Brit. J. Psychol. 1: 253–261.Google Scholar
  71. Peterson, H. A., Ellis, M., Toohill, N., and Kloess, P. (1935). Some measurements of the effects of reviews.J. Educat. Psychol. 26: 65–72.Google Scholar
  72. Petros, T., and Hoving, K. (1980). The effects of review on young children's memory for prose.J. Exper. Child Psychol. 30: 33–43.Google Scholar
  73. Postman, L., and Knecht, K. (1983). Encoding variability and retention.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 22: 133–152.Google Scholar
  74. Pyle, W. H. (1913). Economical learning.J. Educat. Psychol. 3: 148–158.Google Scholar
  75. Rea, C. P., and Modigliani, V. (1985). The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists.Hum. Learn. 4: 11–18.Google Scholar
  76. Rea, C. P., and Modigliani, V. (1987). The spacing effect in 4- to 9-year-old children.Mem. Cognit. 15: 436–443.Google Scholar
  77. Rescorla, R. A., and Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H., and Prokasy, W. F. (eds.),Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 64–99.Google Scholar
  78. Reynolds, J. H., and Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task.J. Educat. Psychol. 55: 297–308.Google Scholar
  79. Rose, A. J. (1980). Encoding variability, levels of processing, and the effects of spacing of repetitions upon judgments of frequency.Mem. Cognit. 8: 84–93.Google Scholar
  80. Rose, A. J. (1984). Processing time for repetitions and the spacing effect.Canad. J. Psychol. 38: 537–550.Google Scholar
  81. Rosenshine, B., and Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In Wittrock, M. C. (ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd. ed.), New York, Macmillan, pp. 376–391.Google Scholar
  82. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1963). Some observations on predicting instructional effectiveness by simple inspection.J. Prog. Instruct. 3: 19–20.Google Scholar
  83. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1966). Learning from written instructive materials: An exploration of the control of inspection behavior by test-like events.Am. Educat. Res. J. 3: 241–249.Google Scholar
  84. Rothkopf, E. Z., and Coke, E. V. (1966). Variations in phrasing and repetition interval and the recall of sentence materials.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 5: 86–89.Google Scholar
  85. Rowe, E. J., and Rose, R. J. (1977). Effects of orienting task, spacing of repetitions, and list context on judgments of frequency.Mem. Cognit. 5: 505–512.Google Scholar
  86. Ruch, T. C. (1928). Factors influencing the relative economy of massed and distributed practice in learning.Psychol. Rev. 35: 19–45.Google Scholar
  87. Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.J. Exper. Psychol. 89: 63–77.Google Scholar
  88. Runquist, W. N. (1983). Some effects of remembering on forgetting.Mem. Cognit. 11: 641–650.Google Scholar
  89. Runquist, W. N. (1986). The effect of testing on the forgetting of related and unrelated associates.Canad. J. Psychol. 40: 65–76.Google Scholar
  90. Saxon, J. (1982). Incremental development: A breakthrough in mathematics.Phi Delta Kappan 63: 482–484.Google Scholar
  91. Shaughnessy, J. J. (1976). Persistence of the spacing effect in free recall under varying incidental learning conditions.Mem. Cognit. 4: 369–377.Google Scholar
  92. Siegel, M. A., and Misselt, A. L. (1984). Adaptive feedback and review paradigm for computer-based drills.J. Educat. Psychol. 76: 310–317.Google Scholar
  93. Slamecka, N. J., and Katsaiti, L. T. (1988). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of prior testing.J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 14: 716–727.Google Scholar
  94. Slavin, R. (1988).Educational Psychology: Theory into Practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  95. Sones, A. M., and Stroud, J. B. (1940). Review with special reference to temporal position.J. Educat. Psychol. 31: 665–676.Google Scholar
  96. Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention.J. Educat. Psychol. 30: 641–656.Google Scholar
  97. Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., and Kim, M. S. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary mathematics textbooks.Cognit. Instruct. 3: 153–171.Google Scholar
  98. Thorndike, E. L. (1916). Notes on practice, improvability and the curve of work.Am. J. Psychol. 27: 550–565.Google Scholar
  99. Toppino, T. C., and DeMesquita, M. (1984). Effects of spacing repetitions on children's memory.J. Exper. Child Psychol. 37: 637–648.Google Scholar
  100. Toppino, T. C., and DiGeorge, W. (1984). The spacing effect in free recall emerges with development.Mem. Cognit. 12: 118–122.Google Scholar
  101. Toppino, T. C., and Gracen, T. F. (1985). The lag effect and differential organization theory.J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 11: 185–191.Google Scholar
  102. Underwood, B. J. (1961). Ten years of massed practice on distributed practice.Psychol. Rev. 68: 229–247.Google Scholar
  103. Underwood, B. J. (1970). A breakdown of the total-time law in free-recall learning.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 573–580.Google Scholar
  104. Watts, G. H., and Anderson, R. C. (1971). Effects of three types of inserted questions learning from prose.J. Educat. Psychol. 62: 387–394.Google Scholar
  105. Whitten, W. B., II, and Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 16: 456–478.Google Scholar
  106. Woolfolk, A. E. (1987).Educational Psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  107. Yeh, J. P. (1978).Test Use in Schools. Washington, D.C., National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  108. Zechmeister, E. B., and Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't.Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 15: 41–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank N. Dempster
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology, College of EducationUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasLas Vegas

Personalised recommendations