Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of the Rural Health Clinics Services Bill: A projection

  • Research Reports
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of directors of midlevel practitioner training programs was conducted to analyze the projected impact of the Rural Health Clinics Services Bill (PL95-210). Sixty-eight percent of the directors responded. The majority of the respondents agreed that the bill would have a positive impact on accessibility and continuity of care and would increase the number of practitioners in rural areas. The directors of nurse practitioner programs disagreed with the directors of physician assistant programs over the issue of physician supervision and midlevel practitioner responsibility for care. Almost half of the respondents believed that the legislated method of reimbursment was not optimal, and 58% felt that financial abuses of the bill may occur. The legal implications of the bill and its impact on cost of care are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roemer MI:Rural Health Care. St. Louis, CV Mosby Co, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy VC: Rural access to a regular source of medical care.J Community Health 4 199–203, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Center for Health Statistics:Vital Statistics of the United States, 1975. DHEW Publication No (PHS) 78-1113, 1978.

  4. Salber EJ, Greene SB, Feldman JJ, et al: Access to health care in a southern rural community.Med Care 14 971–986, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kleinman JC, Wilson RW: Are “medically underserved” areas medically underserved?Health Serv Res 12 147–162, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andersen R, Aday LA: Access to medical care in the United States: Realized and potential.Med Care 16 533–546, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bureau of Health Manpower (Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee):Supply and Distribution of Physicians and Physician Extenders. Hyattsville, Md, Bureau of Health Manpower, Health Resources Administration, 1978. (DHEW Publication No (HRA) 78–11).

  8. Institute of Medicine:A Manpower Policy for Primary Care. Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scheffler RM, Yoder SG, Weisfeld N, et al: Physicians and new health practitioners: Issues for the 1980's.Inquiry 16 195–229, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kane R, Dean M, Solomon M: An evaluation of rural health care research.Eval Quart 3 139–189, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bliss AA, Cohen ED:The New Health Professionals. Germantown, Md, Aspen Systems Corp, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kane RL, Wilson WM: The new health practitioners—The past as prologue.West J Med 127 254–261, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kane RL (ed):New Health Practitioners. DHEW Publication No NIH 75–875. Government Printing Office, 1975.

  14. Perry HB: Physician assistance: An overview of an emerging profession.Med Care 15 982–990, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks EF, Graham RM: The problems, achievements and future of new health practitioners in rural health centers. Presented at the 107th annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, New York, November 7, 1979.

  16. Physician Extenders: Their Current and Future Role in Medical Care Delivery. The Congress of the United States: Congressional Budget Office. April, 1979.

  17. Coverage and reimbursement of rural health clinics services.Federal Register 43 (41) 8258–8265, March, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jennings CP: Third party reimbursement and the nurse practitioner.Nurse Pract 2 (5): 11–13, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dachelet CZ, Sullivan JA: Autonomy in practice.Nurse Pract 4 (2): 15–19, 22, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rushing WA, Miles DL: Physicians, physicians' assistants and the social characteristics of patients in Southern Appalachia.Med Care 15 1004–1013, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Breslau N: The role of the nurse practitioner in a pediatric team: Patient definitions.Med Care 15 1014–1023, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fox JG, Zatkin SR: Third party payment for non-physician health practitioners: Realities and recommendations.Family and Commun Med 1 69–80, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spitzer WO, Sackett DL, Sibley JC, et al: The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner.N Engl J Med 290 251–256, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spector R, McGrath P, Alpert J, et al: Medical care by nurses in an internal medicine clinic: Analysis of quality and cost.JAMA 232 1234–1237, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Foye H, Chamberlain R, Charney E: Content and emphasis of well-child visits: Experienced nurse practitioners vs pediatricians.Am J Dis Child 131 794–797, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chambers LW, Bruce-Lockhart P, Black DP, et al: A controlled trial of the impact of the family practice nurse on volume, quality and cost of rural health services.Med Care 15 971–981, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sox HC: Quality of patient care by nurse practitioners and physicians' assistants: A ten year perspective.Ann Intern Med 91 459–468, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miles DL, Rushing WA: A study of physicians' assistants in a rural setting.Med Care 14 987–995, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blake RL, Guild PA: Mid-level practitioners in rural health care: A three year experience in Appalachia.J Community Health 4 15–22, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Greenfield S, Komaroff AL, Pass TM, et al: Efficiency and cost of primary care by nurses and physician assistants.N Engl J Med 298 305–309, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kane RL, Olsen DM, Wilson WM, et al: Adding a Medex to the medical mix: An evaluation.Med Care 14 996–1003, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tompkins RK, Wood RW, Wolcott BW, et al: The effectiveness and cost of acute respiratory illness medical care provided by physicians and algorithm-assisted physicians' assistants.Med Care 15 991–1003, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  33. McCormack RC, Miller CW: The economic feasibility of rural group practice: Influence of nonphysician practitioners in primary care.Med Care 10 73–80, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ekwo E, Daniels M, Oliver D, et al: The physician assistant in rural primary care practices: Physician assistant activities and physician supervision at satellite and non-satellite practice sites.Med Care 17 787–795, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Celentano DD: New health professional practice patterns.Med Care 16 837–847, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sullivan JA, Dachelet CZ, Sultz HA, et al: The rural nurse practitioner: A challenge and a response.Am J Public Health 68 972–976, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wirth P, Kahn L, Storm E: An analysis of 50 graduates of the Washington University Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Program Part 2: Determinants of geographic location.Nurse Pract 2 14–17, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cooper JK, Heald K, Samuels M: The decision for rural practice.J Med Educ 47 939–944, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Perry HB: An analysis of the specialty and geographic location of physician assistants in the United States.Am J Public Health 68 1019–1021, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Light JA, Crain MJ, Fisher DW: Physician assistants: A profile of the profession, 1976.The PA Journal 7 (3): 109–123, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lawrence DW, Wilson WM, Castle CH: The employment of Medex graduates and trainees: Five year progress report for the United States.JAMA 234 174–177, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Morris SB, Smith DB: The distribution of physician extenders.Med Care 15 1045–1057, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bliss AA, Cohen ED: Issues confronting the new health professionals.J. Allied Health 7 64–71, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Howard DR, Ball JR: The legal and professional recognition of physician's assistants.Fed Bull 60 (7): 7–21, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bullough B: The law and the expanding nursing role.Am J Public Health 66 249–254, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Leitch CJ, Mitchell ES: A state-by-state report: The legal accommodation of nurses practicing expanded roles.Nurse Pract J 2 (8): 19–22, 30, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Trandel-Korenchuk DM, Trandel-Korenchuk KM: How state laws recognize advanced nursing practice.Nurs Outlook 26 713–719, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chapman MW, Record JC: Defensibility of new health professionals at law: A speculative paper.J Health Polit Policy and Law 4 30–48, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Storms DM, Fox JG: The public's view of physician assistants and nurse practitioners. A survey of Baltimore urban residents.Med Care 17 526–535, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Geyman JP: Is there a difference between nursing practice and medical practice?J Fam Pract 5 935–936, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fottler MD: Physician attitudes towards physician extenders: A comparison of nurse practitioners and physician assistants.Med Care 17 536–549, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mauksch IG: The nurse practitioner movement—where does it go from here?Am J Public Health 68 1074–1075, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Miller and Byrne, Inc.:Review and Analysis of State Legislation and Reimbursement Practices of Physician's Assistants and Nurse Practitioners. National Center for Health Services Research, 1978.

  54. Levinson D: Roles, tasks, and practitioners.N Engl J Med 296 1291–1293, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sullivan JA, Dachelet CZ, Sultz HA, et al: Overcoming barriers to the employment and utilization of the nurse practitioner.Am J Public Health 68 1097–1103, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  56. American Medical Association Committee on Nursing. Medicine and nursing in the 1970's: A position statement.JAMA 213 1881–1883, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  57. American Academy of Pediatrics: Academy policy in relation to the pediatric nurse associate.Pediatrics 57 467–486, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Moscovice I, Rosenblatt R: The viability of mid-level practitioners in isolated rural communities.Am J Public Health 69 503–505, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kane RL, Olsen DM, Castle CH: Effects of adding a Medex on practice costs and product activity.J Community Health 3 216–226, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lairson PD, Record JC, James JC: Physician assistants at Kaiser: Distinctive patterns of practice.Inquiry 11 207–219, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Haller MJ, Collins JF: A case report in a rural health center.J Fam Pract 6 (1): 143–147, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rosenblatt RA, Huard B: The nurse practitioner as a physician substitute in a remote rural community: A case Study.Public Health Rep 94 571–576, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zikmund WG, Miller SJ: A factor analysis of attitudes of rural health consumers toward nurse practitioners.Res in Nursing and Health 2 85–90, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Rivara is with the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, 3747 15th Avenue, N.E., Seattle, Washington 98105. The opinions expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Dr. Rivara would like to thank Dr. Noel Tichy for his encouragement to do the study and Dr. James P. LoGerfo for his helpful comments on the manuscript.

In this paper, NPs and PAs when grouped together will be referred to as “midlevel practitioners” MLPs).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivara, F.P. Impact of the Rural Health Clinics Services Bill: A projection. J Community Health 6, 103–112 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01318979

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01318979

Keywords

Navigation