Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of gallstone disease in Mexico

A necropsy study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prevalence of gallstone disease in Mexico was investigated by studying a sample of 21,446 necropsies performed at the Department of Pathology of the General Hospital of Mexico City during a 35-year period (1953–1988). For each decade, 1000 necropsy cases were randomly selected. The crude prevalence of gallstone disease was 14.3%, 8.5% for males and 20.4% for females. The age groups ranged from 20 to more than 80 years old; the age-standardized prevalence for males was 5.6% and for females 16.2%. These rates are intermediate between those found in Chile and some African countries, comparable to some European studies, and less than those found in Mexican-Americans. No significant trend in the prevalence of gallstone disease was found when the different decades were compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heaton KW: The epidemiology of gallstones and suggested aetiology. Clin Gastroenterol 2:67–84, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sampliner RE, Bennett PH, Comess LJ, Rose FA, Burch TA: Gallbladder disease in Pima Indians: Demonstration of high prevalence and early onset by cholecystography. N Engl J Med 283:1358–1364, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marinovic I, Guerra C, Larach G: Incidencia de litiasis biliar en material de autopsia y análisis de composición de los cálculos. Rev Med Chile 100:1320–1327, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rios-Dalenz J, Correa P, Haenszel W: Morbidity from cancer in La Paz, Bolivia. Int J Cancer 28:307–314, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanis CL, Ferrell LE, Tulloch DR, Schull WJ: Gallbladder disease epidemiology in Mexican-Americans in Starr County, Texas. Am J Epidemiol 122:820–829, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maurer KR, Everhart JE, Ezzati TM, Johaness RS, Knowler WC, Larson DL, Sanders R, Shawker TH, Roth HP: Prevalence of gallstone disease in Hispanic populations in the United States. Gastroenterology 96:487–492, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. Albores-Saavedra J, Altamirano-Dimas M: Algunas consideraciones sobre 9412 autopsias realizadas en el Hospital General de México. Gac Med Mex 102:193–203, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradford-Hill A: Principles of Medical Statistics. London, R Clark Ltd Ed., 1971

    Google Scholar 

  9. INEGI: México, estimaciones y proyecciones de población 1950–2000, México, 1981

  10. Teilum D, Olsen B: The prevalence of gallstones in autopsies from a Danish urban area. Scand J Gastroenterol 23:813–816, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zahor Z, Sternby NH, Kagan A, Vernura K, Venecek R, Virchet AM: Frequency of cholelithiasis in Prague and Malmo. An autopsy study. Scan J Gastroenterol 9:3–7, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakayama F, Miyake H: Changing state of gallstone disease in Japan. Composition of the stones and treatment of the condition. Am J Surg 120:794–799, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  13. Acalovschi M, Dumitrauscu D, Clasner I, Ban A: Comparative prevalence of gallstone disease at 100-year interval in a large Romanian town. A necropsy study. Dig Dis Sci 32:334–337, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  14. McFarlane MJ: Supportive evidence for the validity of the epidemiologic necropsy for gallstones. J Gen Intern Med 5:495–500, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simonovis NJ, Wells CK, Feinstein AR:In-vivo and postmortem gallstones: Support for validity of the “epidemiologic necropsy” screening technique. Am J Epidemiol 133:922–931, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weiss KM, Ferrell RE, Hanis CL, Styne PN: Genetics and epidemiology of gallbladder disease in New World native peoples. Am J Hum Genet 36:1259–1278, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maurer KR, Everhart JE, Knowler WC, Shawker TH, Roth HP: Risk factors for gallstone disease in the Hispanic population of the United States. Am J Epidemiol 131:836–844, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haffner SM, Stern MP, Hazuda HP, Rosenthal M, Knapp JA: The role of behavioral variables and fat patterning in explaining ethnic differences in lipids and lipoproteins. Am J Epidemiol 131:836–844, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  19. Diehl AK, Rosenthal M, Hazuda HP, Comeaux PJ, Stern MP: Socioeconomic status and the prevalence of clinical gallbladder disease. J Chron Dis 38:1019–1026, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  20. Méndez N, Jessurun J, Uribe M, Ponciano G y Bosques F: Epidemiología de la litiasis biliar en México. Estudio comparativo de factores de riesgo en dos poblaciones de diferente estrato socioeconómico. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 54:317, 1989 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gilat T, Feldman C, Halpern Z, Dan M, Bar-Meir S: An increased familial frequency of gallstones. Gastroenterology 84:242–246, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson CE, Gay BC: Inheritance of gallbladder disease. Surgery 96:487–492, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thistle JL, Cleary PA, Lachin AM, Tylor MP, Hersh T: The natural history of cholelithiasis: The National Cooperative Gallstone Study. Ann Intern Med 101:171–175, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  24. Uribe M: Litiasis biliar.In Temas Selectos de Hepatología. E Wolpert, D Kershenobich (eds). Mexico City, Ed. Interamericana, 1982, pp 80–82

    Google Scholar 

  25. Méndez N, Uribe M, Ponciano G, Alonso P y Jessurun J: Litiasis biliar. Su prevalencia en el Hospital General de México y su impacto económico en el país. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 52:301, 1987 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Méndez-Sánchez, N., Jessurun, J., Ponciano-Rodríguez, G. et al. Prevalence of gallstone disease in Mexico. Digest Dis Sci 38, 680–683 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01316800

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01316800

Key Words

Navigation