Marine Biology

, Volume 106, Issue 2, pp 297–304 | Cite as

Growth and production inLaminaria solidungula: relation to continuous underwater light levels in the Alaskan High Arctic

  • K. H. Dunton
Article

Abstract

The growth relations of the kelpLaminaria solidungula were examined in the summers of 1984 and from 1986 to 1989 in relation to continuous year-round measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) at several sites in the Stefansson Sound Boulder Patch, Alaskan Beaufort Sea. PAR showed large seasonal differences, ranging from a maximum of 5µmol m−2 s−1 during the ice-covered months to 200µmol m−2 s−1 during the open-water season. In most years, the light received during the 9 mo ice-covered period represented < 10% of the total PAR reaching the plants. Annual variations in PAR ranged from 45 to over 89 mol m−2 yr−1 over the 4 yr period among sites. In 1988, annual quantum budgets forL. solidungula varied from 45 to 50 mol m−2 yr−1, close to that reported in the previous year, and near the annual minimum light requirement reported in other studies for the lower limit ofLaminaria spp. However, the duration of time that the plants were exposed to saturating levels of PAR in 1988 was considerably less than in other years. This was correlated with significant reductions in thallus tissue-density and carbon content during the summer open-water period in 1988. Percentage of dry to wet weight (tissue density) dropped from about 16 to 10%; carbon content from 35 to 28%. The drop in both indices indicated that 1988 summer open-water (ice-free) PAR was insufficient for maintaining maximum photosynthetic carbon fixation. The decreased storage of carbohydrate reserves, which are used for tissue expansion during the dark ice-covered period, resulted in significantly reduced linear growth in all plants the following year (1989). These results provide evidence that in low-light environments, plant production is more a function of exposure to saturating levels of PAR than to the total amount of photons received over the course of a growing season. Under these conditions, under-ice photosynthetic production at very low light levels becomes increasingly important forL. solidungula if it is to meet the metabolic demands imposed by winter growth and respiration.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Chapman, A. R. O., Lindley, J. E. (1980). Seasonal growth ofLaminaria solidungula in the Canadian High Arctic in relation to irradiance and dissolved nutrient concentrations. Mar. Biol. 57: 1–5Google Scholar
  2. Dean, T. A. (1985). The temporal and spatial distribution of underwater quantum irradiation in a southern California kelp forest. Estuar., cstl Shelf Sci. 21: 835–844Google Scholar
  3. Dennison, W. C., Alberte, R. S. (1985). Role of daily light period in the depth distribution ofZostera marina (eelgrass). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 25: 51–61Google Scholar
  4. Dunton, K. H. (1984). An annual carbon budget for an arctic kelp community. In: Barnes, P. W., Schell, D. M., Reimnitz, E. (eds.) The Alaskan Beaufort Sea: ecosystems and environments. Academic Press, Orlando, p. 311–326Google Scholar
  5. Dunton, K. H., Jodwalis, C. M. (1988). Photosynthetic performance ofLaminaria solidungula measured in situ in the Alaska High Arctic. Mar. Biol. 98: 277–285Google Scholar
  6. Dunton, K. H., Reimnitz, E., Schonberg, S. (1982). An arctic kelp community in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Arctic 35: 465–484Google Scholar
  7. Dunton, K. H., Schell, D. M. (1986). Seasonal carbon budget and growth ofLaminaria solidungula in the Alaskan High Arctic. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 31: 57–66Google Scholar
  8. Hiscock, K. (1986). Aspects of the ecology of rocky sublittoral areas. In: Moore, P. G., Seed, R. (eds.) The ecology of rocky coasts. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 290–328Google Scholar
  9. Kirk, J. T. O. (1983). Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Kondratyev, K. Y. (1954). Radiant solar energy [In Russ.]. Leningrad. [cited after Kirk (1983)]Google Scholar
  11. Lüning, K. (1981). Light. In: Lobban, C. S., Wynne, M. J. (eds.) The biology of seaweeds. University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 326–355Google Scholar
  12. Lüning, K., Dring, M. J. (1979). Continuous underwater light measurement near Helgoland (North Sea) and its significance for characteristic light limits in the sublittoral region. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 32: 403–424Google Scholar
  13. Reimnitz, E., Kempema, E. W. (1987). Field observations of slush ice generated during freeze-up in arctic coastal waters. Mar. Geol. 77: 219–231Google Scholar
  14. SAS Institute Inc. (1985). SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 6 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  15. Sears, J. R., Cooper, R. A. (1978). Descriptive ecology of offshore, deep-water, benthic algae in the temperate Western North Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Biol. 44: 309–314Google Scholar
  16. Vadas, R. L., Steneck, R. S. (1988). Zonation of deep water benthic algae in the Gulf of Maine. J. Phycol. 24: 338–346Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. H. Dunton
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Science InstituteThe University of Texas at AustinPort AransasUSA

Personalised recommendations