Abstract
Allozyme electrophoresis was used to show that the two morphologically different groups ofCarcharhinus limbatus co-existing in waters to the north of Australia were distinct species. Forty-eight loci were examined in 967 specimens of the normal form and 20 specimens of the dark pelvic form collected between 1982 and 1985. Two loci exhibited nearly fixed allelic differences between the two forms, indicating that they must be considered as two distinct species. Further genetic analysis ofC. limbatus specimens from the West Indies (the typelocality) and South Africa showed that the rare dark pelvic form is the trueC. limbatus, while the normal form in Australian waters isC. tilstoni.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Compagno, L. J. V. (1984). FAO Species Catalogue Vol. 4. Sharks of the world. F.A.O. Fish. Synopses 125 (4): 1–640
Garrick, J. A. F. (1982). Sharks of the genusCarcharhinus. NOAA natn. mar. Fish. Serv. tech. Rep. Circ. 445: 1–194
Lavery, S., Shaklee, J. B. (1989). Population genetics of two tropical sharks,Carcharhinus tilstoni andC. sorrah, in northern Australia. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 40: 541–557
Lavery, S., Staples, D. (1990). Use of allozyme electrophoresis for identifying two species of penaeid prawn postlarvae. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 41: 259–266
Lyle, J. M. (1986). Mercury and selenium concentrations in sharks from northern Australian waters. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 37: 309–321
MacDonald, C. M. (1988). Genetic variation, breeding structure and taxonomic status of the gummy sharkMustelus antarcticus in southern Australian waters. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 39: 641–648
Nei, M. (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, Austin, Tex. 89: 583–590
Nei, M. (1987). Genetic distance and molecular phylogeny. In: Ryman, N., Utter, F. (eds.) Population genetics and fisheries management. University of Washington Press, Seattle, p. 193–223
Richardson, B. J., Baverstock, P. R., Adams, M. (1986). Allozyme electrophoresis: a handbook for animal systematics and population studies. Sydney, Australia, Academic Press
Shaklee, J. B. (1983). The utilization of isozymes as gene markers in fisheries management and conservation. In: Rattazzi, M., Scandalios, J. G., Whitt, G. S. (eds.) Isozymes. Current topics in biological and medical research. Vol. 110. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, p. 213–247
Shaklee, J. B., Allendorf, F. W., Morizot, D. C., Whitt, G. S. (1989). Genetic nomenclature for protein-coding loci in fish: proposed guidelines. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 118: 218–227
Shaklee, J. B., Busack, C., Marshall, A., Miller, M., Phelps, S. R. (1990). The electrophoretic analysis of salmonid mixed-stock fisheries. In: Market, C. L. (ed.) Isozymes: current topics in biology and medicine. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York (in press)
Shaklee, J. B., Tamaru, C. S., Waples, R. S. (1982). Speciation and evolution of marine fishes studied by the electrophoretic analysis of proteins. Pacif. Sci. 36: 141–157
Smith, P. J. (1986). Low genetic variation in sharks (Chondrichthyes). Copeia 1986: 202–207
Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco
Solé-Cava, A. M., Vooren, C. M., Levy, J. A. (1983). Isozymic differentiation of two sibling species ofSquatina (Chondrichthyes) in south Brazil. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 75B: 355–358
Stevens, J. D., Wiley, P. D. (1986). Biology of two commercially important carcharhinid sharks from Northern Australia. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 37: 671–688
Wright, S. (1978). Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. University of Chicago, Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by G. F. Humphrey, Sydney
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lavery, S., Shaklee, J.B. Genetic evidence for separation of two sharks,Carcharhinus limbatus andC. tilstoni, from Northern Australia. Mar. Biol. 108, 1–4 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313464
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313464