Skip to main content
Log in

Component quantitation of rat ileum

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precise and accurate light microscopic morphometric analyses of biological tissue can be achieved utilizing component quantitative techniques. Component quantitation refers to measurements of the relative volumes of components in tissue sections. Such an assessment is predicated upon the mathematically verifiable assumption that direct quantitative relationships exist between an aggregate of profiles of a component contained per unit area in multiple sections and an aggregate of profiles contained per unit volume. A linear scanning device (micrometer component quantitator) was initially employed for quantitative analyses of pancreas. This quantitative technique has subsequently been applied to normal rat ileum conventionally processed for light microscopy, and the requisite sampling parameters have been defined. An identical technique was then applied to physiologically manipulated rat ileum—a gnotobiotic group, a group with ileal self-filling blind loops, and a group with ileal Thiry-Vella loops. The results observed support the following conclusions. (1) The volume percentage of the various components of the rat ileal wall of control animals was defined utilizing the micrometer component quantitator. (2) Hypertrophy of the ileal muscularis externa within the ileal self-filling blind loops was observed, probably secondary to mechanical obstruction. (3) Atrophy of the ileal epithelium within the gnotobiotic group and within the Thiry-Vella loops was observed, possibly secondary to an altered endogenous microbial flora. (4) Recognition of quantitative variations among the histological components of the intestinal wall in association with physiological manipulations or pathologic states was (is) feasible by utilization of this component quantitative technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazarow A, Carpenter A-M: Component quantitation of tissue sections. I. Characterization of the instruments. J Histochem Cytochem 10:324–328, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carpenter A-M, Lazarow A: Component quantitation of tissue sections. II. A study of the factors which influence the accuracy of the method. J Histochem Cytochem 10:329–340, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  3. Younoszai MK, Ranshaw JC: Quantitation of intestinal tissue layers from their histology. Am J Dig Dis 20:764–770, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loria RM, Kibrick S, El-Bermani A-W, Broitman SA: Preparation of intestine and other elongated specimens for histologic and immunofluorescence studies. Am J Clin Pathol 60:424–427, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rodning CB: A qualitative immunohistochemical and quantitative morphometric analysis of the distribution of intracellular lysozyme and immunoglobulin A in the ileal mucosa ofRattus norvegicus. Doctoral thesis. Department of Anatomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rodning CB, Erlandsen SL, Wilson ID, Carpenter A-M: Light microscopic morphometric analysis of rat ileal mucosa. I. Component quantitation of IgA-containing immunocytes. Dig Dis Sci 28:742–750, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  7. Underwood, EE: Stereology, or the quantitative evaluation of microstructures. J Microsc 89:161–180, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weibel ER, Bolender RP: Stereological techniques for electron microscopic morphometry.In Principles and Techniques of Electronmicroscopy. MA Hayat (editor). New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1973, pp 237–296

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rodning CB, Wilson ID, Erlandsen SL: Component quantitation of rat ileum. Anat Rec 208:150A, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron DG, Watson GM, Watts LJ: The experimental production of macrocytic anemia by operations on the intestinal tract. Blood 4:803–815, 1949

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bishop RE: Bacterial flora of the small intestine of dogs and rats with intestinal blind loops. Br J Exp Pathol 44:189–196, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  12. Panish JF: Experimental blind loop steatorrhea. Gastroenterology 45:394–399, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoet PP, Eyssen A: Steatorrhoea in rats with an intestinal cul-de-sac. Gut 5:309–314, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kent RH, Summers RW, Den Besten L, Swaner JC, Hronda M: Effect of antibiotics on bacterial flora of rats with intestinal blind loops. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 132:63–67, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abrahms GD, Bauer H, Sprinz H: Influence of the normal flora on mucosal morphology and cellular renewal of the ileum. A comparison of germ-free and conventional mice. Lab Invest 12:355–364, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson GR, Trexler PC: Gastrointestinal structure and function in germ-free or gnotobiotic animals. Gut 12:230–235, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gleeson MH, Cullen J, Dowling RH: Intestinal structure and function after small bowel bypass in the rat. Clin Sci 43:731–742, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keren DF, Elliott H, Brown GD, Yardley JH: Atrophy of villi and hypertrophy and hyperplasia of Paneth cells in isolated Thiry-Vella ileal loops in rabbits. Gastroenterology 68:83–93, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thiry L: Ueber eine neue Methode, den Dunndarm zu isolieren Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen. Akad Wiss Math Naturwiss Kl 50:77–96, 1864

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vella L: Nouva metodo per avere succo enterico pure stabilirne le proprieta fisiologiche. Bull Sci Med Bologna 7:441–443, 1881

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodning, C.B., Wilson, I.D. & Erlandsen, S.L. Component quantitation of rat ileum. Digest Dis Sci 31, 428–432 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01311681

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01311681

Keywords

Navigation