The rate of surplus value and crime. A theoretical and empirical examination of Marxian economic theory and criminology

Abstract

Radical criminology is often dismissed on the claim that it is not empirically verifiable. In this paper we argue that grounding the radical approach in Marx's theory of surplus values creates an empirically testable Marxian theory applicable to understanding rates of criminal offending and official responses to criminal behavior. Our analysis demonstrates that the rate of surplus value is a statistically significant predictor of the rate of property crimes known, property crime arrests, violent crimes known, violent crime arrests and total index crimes known to police in the U.S. from 1950 to 1974 controlling for the effects of predictor variables identified in earlier research on crime rates. The theoretical implications of this finding and the importance of the theory of surplus value to the development of radical criminology are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adamson, Christopher, “Toward a Marxian Penology: Captive Criminal Populations as Economic Threats and Resources,”Social Problems 1984(31: 4), 435–458.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adamson, Christopher, “Punishment After Slavery: Southern State Penal Systems, 1865–1880,”Social Problems, 1983 (30: 5), 555–569.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adler, Jeffrey, “A Historical Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy,”Criminology, 1989 (277: 2), 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adler, Jeffrey, “Vagging the Demons and Scoundrels: Vagrancy and the Growth of St. Louis, 1830–1861.”Journal of Urban History, 1986 (13), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alcaly, Roger and Sidney Morgenbesser, “Surplus Value: The Oft Neglected Argument,”Social Research, 1979 (46: 2), 282–290.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allan, Emile Andersen and Darrell Steffensmeier, “Youth, Underemployment and Property Crime,”American Sociological Review, 1989 (54: 1), 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Amsden, Alice, “An International Comparison of the Rate of Surplus Value in Manufacturing Industries,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1989 (5: 3), 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Balkan, Sheila, Ronald Berger and Janet Schmidt,Crime and Deviance in America (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baran, Paul and Paul Sweezy,Monopoly Capitalism (NY: Modern Reader Paperbacks, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barnett, Harold, “Wealth, Crime and Capital Accumulation,” in D. Greenberg (ed.)Crime and Capitalism (Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, 1981a).

    Google Scholar 

  11. —, “Corporate Capitalism, Corporate Crime,”Crime and Delinquency, 1981a (27: 1), 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Belsey, David and Roy E. Welsch,Regression Diagnostics (NY: Wiley and Sons, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blake, William J.,Marxian Economic Theory and its Criticism. (NY: Cordon Company, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blau, Judith and Peter Blau, “The Cost of Inequality: Metropolitan Structures and Violent Crime,”American Sociological Review, 1982 (47), 114–129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bohm, Robert, “Beyond Unemployment: Toward a Radical Solution to the Crime Problem,”Crime and Social Justice, 1985 (21/22), 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bohm-Bawerk, Eugen von,Karl Marx and the Close of His System, (NY: A.M. Kelly, 1896 [1966].

    Google Scholar 

  17. Box, Steven,Recession, Crime and Punishment (Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Nobles, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Box, Steven,Power, Crime and Mystification (London: Tavistock, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Braverman, Harry,Labor and Monopoly Capital (NY: Monthly Review Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burowoy, Michael,Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cantor, David and Kenneth Land, “Unemployment and Crime Rates in the post-world War II United States,”American Sociological Review, 1985 (50), 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chambliss, William, “The Law of Vagrancy,” in W.J. Chambliss (ed.)Criminal Law in Action (NY: John Wiley, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chambliss, William, “A Sociological Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy,”Social Problems, 1964 (12), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiricos, Theodore G., “Rates of Crime and Unemployment: An Analysis of Aggregate Research Evidence,”Social Problems, 1987 (34: 2), 187–212.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Christ, C.S.,Econometric Models and Methods (NY: Wiley, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Colvin, M. and J. Pauly, “A Critique of Criminology: Toward an Integrated Structural-Marxist Theory of Delinquency Production,”American Journal of Sociology, 1983 (90: 3), 513–551.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen, Bernard, “Reporting Crime: The Limits of Statistical and Field Data,” in A.S. Blumberg (ed.),Current Perspectives on Criminal Behavior (NY: Knopf, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen, Lawrence and Marcus Felson, “Social Change and Crime rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach,”American Sociological Review, 1979 (44), 588–608.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen, Lawrence E., Marcus Felson and Kenneth Land, “Property Crime Rates in the United States: A Macrodynamic Analysis, 1974–1977; with Ex-Ante Forecasts for the Mid-1980s,”American Journal of Sociology, 1980 (86), 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cueno, Carl J., “Reconfirming Karl Marx's Rate of Surplus Value,”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 1984 (21: 1), 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  31. —, “Class Struggle and the Measurement of the Rate of Surplus Value,”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 1982 (19: 3), 377–425.

    Google Scholar 

  32. —, “Class Exploitation in Canada.”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 1978 (15: 3), 284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cullen, Frank,Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Currie, Elliot,Confronting Crime (New York: Pantheon, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Currie, Elliot and Jerome Skolnick,America's Problems (Boston: Little, Brown, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Desai, Meghand,Marxian Economic (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Durbin, J., “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables,”Econometrica, 1970 (38), 410–421.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Emmerson, R.J. and P.N. Rowe, “Professor Cueno's Analysis of Class Exploitation in Canada,”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 1982 (19: 2), 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Engels, Fredrick,Anti-Duhring (Moscow: Progress, 1975 [1894]).

    Google Scholar 

  40. —,The Conditions of the Working Class in England Moscow: Progress, 1973 [1845].

    Google Scholar 

  41. Felson, Marcus and Lawrence E. Cohen, “Modeling Crime Rate Trends — A Criminal Opportunity Perspective,”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1981 (18), 138–164.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fisher, Joseph and Robert L. Mason, “The Analysis of Multicollinear Data in Criminology,” in J. Fox (ed.),Methods in Quantitative Criminology (NY: Academic Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fox, James Alan,Forecasting Crime Data (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Frank, Nancy and Michael J. Lynch,Corporate Crime, Corporate Violence (New York: Harrow and Heston, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Glyn, A. and B. Sutcliffe, British Capitalism, Workers and the Profit Squeeze (Harmondsworth: Penguin Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Greenberg, David, “Age, Crime and Social Explanation.” American Journal of Sociology, 1985 (91:1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  47. —,Crime and Capitalism (Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  48. —, “The Dynamics of Oscillatory Punishment Processes,”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1977 (68: 4), 643–651.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Groves, W. Byron, “Marxism and Positivism,”Crime and Social Justice, 1985; 23: 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Groves, W. Byron and Michael J. Lynch, “Reconciling Structural and Subjective Approaches to the Study of Crime,”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1990 (27: 4), 348–375.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Groves, W. Byron and Robert Sampson, “Traditional as Radical Criminology,”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1987 (24: 3), 181–214.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Groves, W. Byron and Nancy Frank, “Punishment and the Sociology of Structured Choice,” in W.B. Groves and G.R. Newman (eds.),Punishment and Privilege (NY: Harrow and Heston, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Groves, W. Byron and Charles Corrado, “Culture as Metaphysics: An Appraisal of Cultural Models,”Crime and Social Justice, 1983 (20), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Habermas, Jurgen,Legitimation Crises (Boston: Beacon, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hagan, John, A.R. Gillis and John Simpson, “Class in the Household: A Power-Control Theory of Gender and Delinquency,”American Journal of Sociology, 1987 (92), 788–816.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hagan, John, A.R. Gillis and John Simpson, “The Class Structure of Gender and Delinquency: Toward a Power-Control Theory of Common Delinquent Behavior,”American Journal of Sociology, 1985 (90), 1151–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Harring, Sidney,Policing a Class Society (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Harring, Sidney, “Class Conflict and the Suppress of Tramps in Buffalo, 1892–1894,”Law and Society Review, 1977, (11: 5), 873–911.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hindus, Michael S.,Prison and Plantation: Crime, Justice and Authority in Massachusetts and South Carolina (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hirschi, Travis,Causes of Delinquency (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hirschi, Travis and Michael Gottfredson, “Age and Crime,”American Journal of Sociology, 1983 (89: 3), 552–584.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Inciardi, James,Radical Criminology: The Coming Crises (Beverly Hills, Sage, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Issac, Larry W. and Larry J. Griffin, “A historicism in Time-Series Analyses of Historical Processes: Critique, Redirection and Illustrations from U.S. Labor History,”American Sociological Review, 1989 (54: 6), 873–890.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jacobs, David, “Inequality and Police Strength,”American Sociological Review, 1979 (44), 913–924.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jacobs, David and D. Brill, “Inequality and Police Use of Deadly Force: An Empirical Assessment of the Conflict Hypothesis,”Social Problems, 1979 (26), 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Jankovic, Ivan, “Labor Markets and Imprisonment,” in T. Platt and P. Takagi's (eds.),Punishment and Penal Discipline (San Francisco: Synthesis Press, 1982a).

    Google Scholar 

  67. —, “Social Class and Criminal Sentencing,” in T. Platt and P. Takagi's (eds.),Punishment and Penal Discipline (San Francisco: Synthesis Press, 1982b).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Klockars, Carl, “The Contemporary Crisis of Marxist Criminology,” in J. Inciardi's (ed.),Radical Criminology (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Land, Kenneth and Marcus Felson, “A General Framework for Building Dynamic Marco Social Indicator Models: Including an Analysis of Change in Crime Rates and Police Expenditures,”American Journal of Sociology, 1976 (82), 565–604.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lizotte, Alan, “Extra-Legal Factors in Chicago's Criminal Courts: Testing the Conflict Model of Criminal Justice,”Social Problems 1978 (25), 564–580.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lizotte, Alan, James Mercy and Eric Monkkonen, “Crime and Police Strength in an Urban Setting,” in J. Hagan's (ed.)Quantitative Criminology (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lynch, Michael J., “The Extraction of Surplus Value, Crime and Punishment: A Preliminary Examination,”Contemporary Crises, 1988 (12), 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  73. —, “Quantitative Analysis and Marxist Criminology,”Crime and Social Justice, 1987 (29), 110–127.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lynch, Michael J. and W. Byron Groves, A Primer in Radical Criminology, second edition (New York: Harrow and Heston, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lynch, Michael J., E. Britt Patterson and J. Santiago Nunez, The Rate of Surplus Value, the Organic Composition of Capital, the Marxian Rate of Profit and Crime in the U.S., 1960–1988. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Denver, Colorado, 1990.

  76. Mandel, Ernest,Late Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Marquardt, D., “Generalized Inverse Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation and Nonlinear Estimation,”Technometrics, 1970 (12), 591–612.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Marx, Karl,Capital, Volume II (NY: International, 1981a).

    Google Scholar 

  79. —,Capital, Volume III (NY: International, 1981b).

    Google Scholar 

  80. —,The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, D.J. Struik (ed.) (NY: International, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  81. —,Capital, Volume I (N.Y.: New World Paperbacks, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  82. —,Theories of Surplus Value, Volume I, Volume II, and Volume III, (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969a, b, c).

    Google Scholar 

  83. McDowall, David and Colin Loftin, “Fiscal Politics and the Police: Detroit, 1928–1976,”Social Forces, 1986 (65: 1), 162–176.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Monkkonen, Eric H., “Regional Dimensions of Tramping, North and South, 1880–1910,” in E.H. Monkkonen (ed.),Walking to Work: Tramps in America, 1970–1935 (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Monkkonen, Eric, “A Disorderly People? Urban Order in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,”Journal of American History, 1981 (68), 539–559.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Moseley, Fred, “The Rate of Surplus Value in the Postwar US Economy: A Critique of Weisskopf's Estimates,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1985 (9), 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Neter, John, W. Wasserman and M.H. Kutner,Applied Linear Statistical Models (Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin Inc., 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Nettler, Gwynn,Explaining Crime (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  89. O'Connor, James, Accumulation Crisis (NY: Basil-Black, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  90. O'Connor, James,The Fiscal Crisis of the State (NY: St. Martins Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Offe, Claus,Disorganized Capitalism (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Perlow, Victor,Super Profits and Crisis: Modern U.S. Capitalism (NY: International, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Pindyck, Robert and Daniel Rubinfeld,Econometrics and Models for Economic Forecasts (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Quinney, Richard,Class, State and Crime (NY: Longman, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  95. —,Criminology (Boston: Little, Brown, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Rusche, Georg and Otto Kirchheimer,Punishment and Social Structure (NY: Russel and Russell, 1968 [1939].

    Google Scholar 

  97. Shichor, David, “The New Criminology: Some Critical Issues,”British Journal of Criminology, 1980 20: 1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Spitzer, Steven, “Toward a Marxian Theory of Deviance,” in D. Kelly's (ed.),Criminal Behavior (NY: St. Martins, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Sweezy, Paul,Capitalist Development (NY: Modern Paperback Readers, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Sweezy, Paul and Harry Magdoff, “Capitalism and Unemployment,”Monthly Review, 1982 (27), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Varley, D., “On the Computation of the Rate of Surplus Value,”Science and Society, 1938 (11: 3), 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Weisskopf, Thomas E., “The Rate of Surplus Value in the Postwar US Economy: A Response to Moseley's Critique,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1985 (9), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  103. —, “Marxian Crisis Theory and the Rate of Profit in the US Economy,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1979 (3), 341–378.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Wright, Erik Olin,Class, Crisis and the State (NY: Vesco, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  105. —,Classes (London: Vesco, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynch, M.J., Groves, W.B. & Lizotte, A. The rate of surplus value and crime. A theoretical and empirical examination of Marxian economic theory and criminology. Crime Law Soc Change 21, 15–48 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01307806

Download citation

Keywords

  • Predictor Variable
  • Early Research
  • Crime Rate
  • International Relation
  • Violent Crime