Skip to main content
Log in

Solid swallowing versus water swallowing: manometric study of dysphagia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate whether a soft solid bolus can induce abnormal manometric patterns in patients with dysphagia and normal standard manometry. The study group comprised 12 normal volunteers and 22 patients with dysphagia. Manometry was performed using 10 wet swallows followed by 10 swallows of marshmallow. The results show: (1) in normal subjects the mean contraction amplitude is significantly greater (P<0.035) and the velocity of propagation significantly slower (P<0.003) for soft solid swallows compared with wet swallows; (2) in normal subjects there are fewer abnormal contractions after soft solid swallows than after wet swallows; (3) in 15 patients, soft solid swallows induced nonperistaltic contractions and/or contractions of extreme amplitude and/or duration that were not observed after wet swallows; 94) in patients, the probability of inducing abnormal contractions after soft solid swallows is significantly greater than after wet swallows (P<0.0001). We conclude that soft solid swallowing is useful in the study of patients with dysphagia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benjamine SB, Richter JE, Cordova CM, Knuff TE, Castell DO: Prospective manometric evaluation with pharmacologic provocation of patients with suspected esophageal motility dysfunction. Gastroenterology 84:893–898, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mellow MH: Esophageal motility during food ingestion: A physiologic test of esophageal motor function. Gastroenterology 85:570–577, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen ML, Orr WC, Mellow MH, Robinson MG: Water swallows versus food ingestion as manometric tests for esophageal dysfunction. Gastroenterology 95:831–833, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer GW, Gerhardt DC, Castell DO: Human esophageal response to rapid swallowing: Muscle refractory period or neural inhibition? Am J Physiol 241:G129-G136, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ask P, Tibbling L: Effect of time interval between swallows on esophageal peristalsis. Am J Physiol 238:G485-G490, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kramer P: Food ingestion as a provocative manometric test for esophageal dysfunction. Gastroenterology 9:959–960, 1989 (letter)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dalton CB: Measurements and interpretations.In Esophageal Motility Testing. DO Castell, JE Richter, CB Dalton (eds). New York, Elsevier Science Publishing, 1987, pp 66–78

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clouse RE, Staiano A: Contraction Abnormalities of the esophageal body in patients referred for manometry. A new approach to manometric classification. Dig Dis Sci 28:784–791, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richter JE: Normal values for esophageal manometry.In Esophageal Motility Testing. DO Castell, JE Richter, CB Dalton (eds). New York, Elsevier Science Publishing, 1987, pp 79–90

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castell DO: The nutcracker esophagus and other primary esophageal motility disorders.In Esophageal Motility Testing. DO Castell, JE Richter, CB Dalton (eds), New York, Elsevier Science Publishing, 1987, pp 130–140

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freidin N, Mittal RK, Traube M, McCallum RW: Segmental high amplitude peristaltic contractions in the distal esophagus. Am J Gastrenterol 84:619–623, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benjamin SB, Gerhardt DC, Castell DO: High amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain and/or dysphagia. Gastroenterology 77:478–483, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mellow M: Symptomatic diffuse esophageal spasm. Manometric follow-up and response to cholinergic stimulation and cholinesterase inhibition. Gastroenterology 73:237–240, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  14. Katz PO, Castell DO: Review: Esophageal motility disorder. Am J Med Sci 290:61–69, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dooley CP, Schlossmacher B, Valenzuela JE: Effects of alterations in bolus viscosity on esophageal peristalsis in humans. Am J Physiol 254:G8-G11, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dooley CP, Di Lorenzo C, Valenzuela JE: Esophageal function in humans. Effects of bolus consistency and temperature. Dig Dis Sci 35:167–172, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sears VW Jr, Castell JA, Castell DO: Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures on normal humans. Dig Dis Sci 35:857–864, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  18. Applegate GR, Malmud LS, Rock E, Reilley JR, Fisher RS: “It's a hard pill to swallow” or “Don't take it lying down.” Gastroenterology 78:1132, 1980 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher RS, Malmud LS, Applegate G, Rock E, Lorber SH: Effect of bolus composition on esophageal transit: Concise communication. J Nucl Med 23:878–882, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  20. Castell DO: Esophageal motility disorders: The specter of the spectrum. Dig Dis Sci 30:188–189, 1985 (Letter)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keren, S., Argaman, E. & Golan, M. Solid swallowing versus water swallowing: manometric study of dysphagia. Digest Dis Sci 37, 603–608 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01307587

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01307587

Key Words

Navigation