Skip to main content
Log in

It's fun to do things together: Two cases of explorative user studies

  • Published:
Personal Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes two explorative user studies conducted in a research project called Maypole. The purpose of the first user study was to understand how children thought communication with personal technologies could be fun. The second study focused on what children thought was fun in taking and editing digital images. In both studies, children aged 7–12 were given existing personal technologies to use in their own environment for one week. After that, a focus group was held with the children in order to discuss what they thought was fun in using the technologies.

The results of the two user studies illustrate how fun in using personal technologies could relate to a user's social behaviour, and not only to human-computer interaction. Therefore, designers are encouraged to explore further the social aspects of fun in their creations. Moreover, the two studies illustrate some methodological problems in studying a user's experience of fun, which refer to a need for more public research on methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The digital hug: families keeping in touch. A special Maypole issue of interactions. Interactions, November 1999

  2. Mäkelä A, Battarbee K. Applying usability methods to concept development of a future wireless communication device—case in Maypole. In: Proceedings of 17th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunication, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4–7 May 1999; 291–298

  3. Oosterholt R, Kusano M, de Vries G. Interaction design and human factors support in the development of a personal communicator for children. In: Proceedings of CHI '96, 13–18 April 1996; Addison-Wesley

  4. Abramis DJ. Play in work. Childish hedonism or adult enthusiasm? American Behavioural Scientist, 1990; 33(3): 353–373

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K. Contextual design. Defining customer-centred systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 1998

  6. Hackos JT, Redish JC. User and task analysis for interface design. Wiley Computer Publishing, 1998

  7. Wixon D, Ramey J. Field methods casebook for software design. Wiley Computer Publishing, 1996

  8. Kemp JAM, Gelderen, T. Co-discovery exploration: an informal method for iterative design of consumer products. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester AB (eds). Usability evaluation in industry. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dandavate U, Sanders E, Stuart S. Emotions matter: user empathy in the product development process. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting, 1996; 415–418

  10. Rikjen D, Mulder B. Information ecologies, experience and ergonomics. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmester BA, McClelland IL (eds), Usability evaluation in industry. London: Taylor & Francis 1996, 49–58

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gaver B, Dunne T, Pacenti E. Design: cultural probes. Interactions, 1999; 6(1): 21–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anu Mäkelä.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mäkelä, A., Battarbee, K. It's fun to do things together: Two cases of explorative user studies. Personal Technologies 3, 137–140 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01305339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01305339

Keywords

Navigation