Skip to main content
Log in

Regulatory takings and constitutional repair the 1990s' property-rights rebellion

  • Articles
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of the fact that the Constitution's fifth amendment states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation,” politicians systematically impose almost confiscatory land-use restrictions on citizens. Growth of regulation and property-rights uncertainty have spawned grass roots opposition and political efforts to reinforce constitutional protections. Lacking success at the national level, property-rights advocates moved to the states where by August 1994 more than forty introduced property-rights legislation. Statistical estimates of the likelihood that such legislation would be introduced reveal strong support of the notion that the property-rights movement is a reaction to growth of government regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B. (1991)We the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranson, P. H. (1991) “Calhoun's Constitutional Economics.”Constitutional Political Economy 2: 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrensen, D. A. (1988) “Compensation for Regulatory Takings: Finality of Local Decisionmaking and the Measure of Compensation.”Indiana Law Journal 63 (Summer): 649–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P. M. (1994) “A Store Owner's Squabble with a City Tests Government's Right to Private Land.”Wall Street Journal, March 23, B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, W. T. (1991) “Civil War Against Property Owners?Richmond Times-Dispatch, August 4, H-7.

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1973) “The Coase Theorem and the Theory of the State.”Natural Resources Journal 13 (October): 579–594. Reprinted in: James M. Buchanan and Robert T. Tollison (eds.) (1984),The Theory of Public Choice II (pp. 159–173). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and D. Lee. (1995) “Having It Both Ways.”Forbes (February 27): 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, D. C. (1993) “Property' in the Fifth Amendment: A Quest for Common Ground in the Maze of Regulatory Takings.”Vanderbilt Law Review 46 (October): 1283–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, B. (1992a) “Bills Proposed by House, Senate Derived from Less-Than-Pure Motives.”Arizona Republic (February 23): D14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, B. (1992b) “Symington May Face 2 Bills Best Scrapped.”Arizona Republic, May 17: D11

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J. C. (1992) “The Fort Hill Address: On the Relations of the States and Federal Government” (Original, 1831). In: Ross M. Lence (ed.),Union and Liberty: The Political Philosophy of John C. Calhoun (pp. 382–383). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camia, C. (1994) “Legislators Draw in the Reins on Environmental Rules.”Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (April 30): 1060–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost.”Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, R. W. (1983)Controlling Industrial Pollution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defenders of Property Rights. (1993) “Pennsylvania Supreme Court Strikes Down Overreaching by Philadelphia Historical Commission.” Washing, DC: Defenders of Property Rights (November 16).

    Google Scholar 

  • “Downsizing Government.” (1995)Business Week (January 23): 37–41.

  • Epstein, R. A. (1985)Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Government, Keep Out” (1994)The Economist (July 2): 26.

  • Henderson, B. (1994) “Property Rights Debate Could Shape Environmental Law.”The State (April 18): B5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoye, D. (1992) “Environmental Interests Put on Defensive: Legislation Feared Tip of Iceberg.”Phoenix Gazette, February 28, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Is Taking Stealing?” (1993)The Economist (March 6): 24.

  • Ivy, L. (1988) “The 1986 Term ‘Takings’ Clause Cases: A Unified Approach to Regulatory Takings?”Oklahoma City University Law Review 13 (Summer): 325–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P. W. (1992)Legitimacy and History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiplinger Washington Letter. (1995) (February 3).

  • Knickerbocker, B. (1993) “Property-Rights Movement gains Ground in Congress.”Christian Science Monitor, September 22, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, R. (1992) “Petitions Submitted to Halt Property Law: Measure May Go to Arizona Voters.”Phoenix Gazette, September 30, B2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, M. (1993) “The ‘Property Rights’ Revolt: Environmentalists Fret as States Pass Reagan-Style Takings Laws.”National Law Journal 15 (May 10): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. E. (1993) “Property as a Civil Right: The Expansion of Washington State Regulatory Taking Law.”Willamette Law Review 29 (Fall): 867–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzulla, N. G. (1991) “Pennsylvania Court Strikes a Blow Against Unduly Burdensome Historic Designation of Private Property.”Land Rights Letter (December): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzulla, N. G. (1992a) “A Two-Front Battle for Property Rights.”Christian Science Monitor, September 18, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzulla, N. G. (1992b) “A Wetland That Not Even a Glancing Goose Could Save.”Land Rights Letter (June): 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzulla, N. G. (1993) “Who Benefits from the State Private Property Legislation? You, the Taxpayer.”Land Rights Letter (June): 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzulla, R. J. (1988) “The New ‘Takings’ Executive Order and Environmental Regulation-Collision or Cooperation?”Environmental Law Reporter (July): 10,254–10,260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzulla, R. J., and N. G. Marzulla. (1991) “Regulatory Takings in the United States Claims Courts: Adjusting the Burdens That in Fairness and Equity Ought to be Borne by Society as a Whole.”Catholic University Law Review 40 (Spring): 549–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiners, R. E., and B. Yandle. (1992) “Constitutional Choice for the Control of Water Pollution.”Constitutional Political Economy 3 (1992): 359–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penhale, E. (1992) “Developers Chip at Growth Control: Attack on the State's Law Is Paying Off in Senate.”Seattle Post-Intelligencer, February 21, B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A. (1971) “Taxation by Regulation.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (Spring): 22–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, H. N. (1990) “Houses on the Sand: Takings Issues Surrounding Statutory Restrictions on the Use of Oceanfront Property.”Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 18 (Fall): 125–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springston, R. (1993) “Merit of Land Regulation: Debated Measure to Limit Governmental ‘Takings’ Has More Foes Than Friends at Session Here.”Richmond Times-Dispatch, December 1, B-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staff Report. (1994) “Property Owner Compensation Backed.”Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 15, A6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (1995) “Old MacDonald Had a Subsidy.”Wall Street Journal, February 15, A18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, J. T. (1991) “Coleman v. Utah State Land Board: Searching for a Balanced Approach to ‘Takings’ Under the Utah Constitution.”Utah Law Review (Spring): 505–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J., and S. Maier. (1992) “Putting on Pressure for Property Rights: Anti-Environmentalists Gain Headway in Olympia.”Seattle Post-Intelligencer, March 18, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. W., and M. D. Solov. (1992) “New Standards, If Not Greater Protection, Against Land Use Regulations.”Florida Bar Journal 66 (December): 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Almanac and Book of Facts. (1992) New York: Scripps-Howard.

  • Yandle, B. (1989)The Political Limits of Environmental Regulation. Westport, CT: Quorum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yandle, B. (1991) “Organic Constitutions and Common Law.”Constitutional Political Economy 2: 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yandle, B. (1994) “Regulatory Takings, Farmers, Ranchers and the Fifth Amendment.” Center for Policy Studies, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yandle, B. (1995)Land Rights: The 1990s Property Rights Rebellion. Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boudreaux, D.J., Lipford, J. & Yandle, B. Regulatory takings and constitutional repair the 1990s' property-rights rebellion. Constit Polit Econ 6, 171–190 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303256

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303256

Keywords

Navigation