Skip to main content
Log in

A factor analysis of socio-economic determinants of property crimes in cities

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past a number of studies on the economics of crime have emphasized the importance of deterrence in crime prevention while assigning lesser importance to socio-economic determinants. Others have concentrated on the role of the socio-economic variables in crime production and have utilized the multiple regression analysis which has produced ambiguous results due to the presence of strong multicollinearity among independent variables. This paper is concerned with socio-economic determinants of urban property crimes, and utilizes factor analysis to overcome the problems associated with multicollinearity. Three factors are extracted out of twelve variables with data from the 47 of the largest cities in Ohio in 1970. The three factors are used as independent variables in the linear regression analysis for different types of property crimes. The highlights of the findings are that economic forces play an important role in the determination of property crimes but in addition other sociological variables which represent attitudes, tradition, mores and values are also important. “Ethnicity” or variables associated with community stability seem to discourage deviant behavior and thus crime. Economists may, therefore, need to give greater attention to these variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison, John S. “Economic Factors and the Rate of Crime.”Land Economics, 48 (May, 1972): 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, Gary S. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.”Journal of Political Economy, 78 (March/April, 1968): 169–217.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boggs, S. L. “Urban Crime Patterns.”American Sociological Review, 30 (December, 1965): 899–908.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrlich, Isaac. “Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation.”Journal of Political Economy, 81 (May/June, 1973): 521–565.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fleisher, B. M. “The Effect of Income on Delinquency.”American Economic Review, 56 (March, 1966): 118–137.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Economics of Delinquency. Chicago, Illinois: Quadrangle Books, Inc., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs, L. H.Family Matters. New York: Random House, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guttentag, M. “The Relationship Between Unemployment to Crime and Delinquency.”Journal of Social Issues, 24 (January, 1968): 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffery, C. R. “An Integrated Theory of Crime and Criminal Behavior.”The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 49 (March/ April, 1959): 533–552.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kau, J. B., and P. H. Rubin. “New Estimates of the Determinants of Urban Crime.”The Annals of Regional Science, 60 (March, 1975): 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, Oscar.La Vida. New York: Random House, Inc., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McNown, R. F., and L. D. Singell. “A Factor Analysis of the Socioeconomic Structure of Riot and Crime Prone Cities.“The Annals of Regional Science, 8 (February, 1974): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips, L. “The War on Crime: Prevention or Control.” in L. Phillips and H. L. Votey, Jr., eds.,Economic Analysis of Pressing Social Problems. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips, L., H. L. Votey, Jr., and D. Maxwell. “Crime, Youth, and the Labor Market.”Journal of Political Economy, 80 (May/June, 1972): 491–504.

    Google Scholar 

  15. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice.Task Force Report: Crime and Its Impact—An Assessment. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  16. —.The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rummel, R. J.Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmid, C. F. “Urban Crime Areas: Part I.”American Sociological Review, 25 (August, 1960): 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sjoquist, D. L. “Property Crime and Economic Behavior: Some Empirical Results.”American Economic Review, 63 (June, 1973): 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swimmer, E. “Measurement of the Effectiveness of Urban Law Enforcement—A Simultaneous Approach.”Southern Economic Journal (April, 1974): 618–630.

  21. U. S. Bureau of Census.1960 Census of Population, Area Measurement Reports. GE-20, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  22. -1970 Census of Population, General Social and Economic Characteristics, Ohio. PC(1)-C37, Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office.

  23. U. S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.Uniform Crime Reports, 1970. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, August 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Welford, C. R. “Crime and the Police: A Multivariate Analysis.”Criminology. 12 (August, 1974): 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author thanks David Croyle for providing the data, Usha Mohan for computations and Harvey Rosen for helping with the computer program. He is grateful to Belton Fleisher of Ohio State University, and E. Peterson of University of Utah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathur, V.K. A factor analysis of socio-economic determinants of property crimes in cities. Ann Reg Sci 10, 116–127 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303247

Keywords

Navigation