Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of Alaskan oil development on the Washington-Alaska trade

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Washington State serves as a marketing and transportation center for Alaska trade. This study estimates, via a Location Quotient Input-Output model for Alaska, the impact Alaskan oil development will have on various economic sectors in both states. A “From-To” table and the existing Washington Input-Output table quantified the impacts on Washington.

The Alaska oil development impact will result in a tripling of the Alaskan economy's output from 1972 to 1980. The largest impact in Alaska will be on the Service, Finance, Agriculture, Trade, and State and Local Government sectors. The impact on Washington will be felt in sectors of Transportation, Finance, Trade, and Agriculture resulting in an aggregate increase in the Washington economy of 10.6 percent if 50 percent of Alaska's import requirements are provided by Washington, and 5.3 percent if the import movement is 25 percent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fort, John W. and James C. Kite,Possibilities for Synthesizing Input-Output Coefficients for Small Areas in Rural Development Research, paper presented at joint meetings of American Agricultural Economics Association, Canadian Agricultural Economics Association, and the Western Agricultural Economics Association at the University of Alberta, August 1973.

  2. Morrison, W. I. and P. Smith, “Non-Survey I-O Techniques at the Small Area Level: An Evaluation,”The Journal of Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania, the Regional Science Research Institute, Vol. 14, April 1974.

  3. Doeksen and Little, “Effect of Size of the I-O Model on the Results of an Impact Analysis,” Ag Econ Research, October 1968.

  4. Mustafa, Gholam and L. L. Jones,Regional Input-Output Model Using Location Quotients, Program and Model Documentation, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A & M University, 1971.

  5. The Department of the Army, Waterborne Commerce, Statistics of the United States, compiled by the Corps of Engineers, 1966–1972.

  6. Rogers, John M.,State Estimates of Interregional Commodity Trade 1963, Lexington, Massachusetts, D. C. Heath and Company, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borque, Philip, et al.,The Washington Economy: An Input-Output Study, The Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Washington, and the Department of Commerce and Economic Development for the State of Washington, Business Study No. 3, 1967.

  8. Engleman, Paul, Kenneth Price, and Nick Carney, Personal interviews at the Alaska State Department of Economic Development, Anchorage and Juneau, September 1974.

  9. Pietsch, William H., “Input-Output Analysis of Import Substitution: A Case Study of Potential Impacts of Expanded Washington Beef Production,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University, 1971.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work was done under Regional project 0191, “An Economic Analysis of present and potencial Trade Between Alaska Washington”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Logsdon, C.L., Casavant, K.L. The impact of Alaskan oil development on the Washington-Alaska trade. Ann Reg Sci 10, 104–115 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303246

Keywords

Navigation