Skip to main content
Log in

Federal crime legislation through the eyes of Alexis de Tocquiville

  • Articles
  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The political process entailed in the passage of federal crime legislation in 1994 and the revisions of it being considered in 1995 are analyzed as a manifestation of three central themes about American politics articulated by Alexis de Tocqueville inDemocracy in America published in 1835. It is argued that “crackdown” measures of dubious value in fighting crime are the result of majoritarianism, a national consensus favoring very conservative crime policies. A second factor at work is pluralism, the strong role played by interest groups in American politics. Thirdly, the racial politics which De Tocqueville thought were destined to plague the United States indefinitely are shown to form a backdrop to the formulation of crime control measures. The article concludes with a discussion of a strategy for the development of more enlightened crime policies in the face of stark realities about the nature of the policy-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, P., “Clinton Wants to Broaden Federal Fight Against Crime, but Strategy has Critics.”The Wall Street Journal 1993, March 12, p. A10.

  • Brewer, G. and P. deLeon,The Foundations of Policy Analysis Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clyner, A., “The House Is Grappling with Itself on Crime.”The New York Times 1994, January 21, p. A14.

  • Dilulio, Jr., J., “Five Crime Bills-Better Than (N) One.”The Wall Street Journal 1994, August 16, p. A12.

  • Gross, J., “California Contemplates Paddling Graffiti Vandals.”The New York Times 1994, August 7, p. 22.

  • Ifill, G., “‘Victory’ Over Crime, At Least Politically.”The New York Times 1994, August 28, p. E1.

  • Janda, K., J. Berry and J. Goldman,The Challenge of Democracy: Government in America. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehl, D., “Clinton Promises to Veto Measure on Police Funding.”The New York Times 1995, February 12, p. 1.

  • Johnston, D. and S. Holmes, “Experts Doubt Effectiveness of the Newly Enacted Crime Bill.”The New York Times 1994, September 19, p. A16.

  • Kelling, G., T. Pate, D. Dieckman and C. Brown,The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: A Technical Report. (Washington, D.C.: Police Foundation, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., “Robert Kennedy's Last Campaign: How the Best Idea in Bill Clinton's Crime Bill Was Saved.”Newsweek 1994, August 8, p. 23.

  • Lavrakis, P., “Crime Prevention Public Policy and Politics: The Role of Elected Officials and Journalists.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Boston, 1995, March 9.

  • Maguire, K. and A. Pastore, eds.,Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. (Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R., “What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform.”Public Interest 1974 (35), 22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, S., “What the Crime Bill Does.”The Wall Street Journal 1994, June 13, p. A16.

  • Purdum, T., “Anticrime Bill Will Not End U.S. Violence, Bradley Says.”The New York Times 1994, May 12, p. A22.

  • Rauch, J.,Demosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American Government. (New York: Times Books, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. and H. Freeman,Evaluation: A Systemic Approach. 5th ed. (Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.,The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. (Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheingold, S.,The Politics of Law and Order: Street Crime and Public Policy. (New York: Longman, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seelye, K., “House Easily Approves Vastly Altered Crime Bill.”The New York Times 1995, February 15, p. A1.

  • Sherman, L.,Policing Domestic Violence: Experiments and Dilemmas. (New York: Free Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J., Presidential Address Delivered to the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology entitled “What Not to Do About Crime,” Miami, Florida, 1994, November 10.

  • Starling, G.,Strategies for Policy Making. (Chicago: Dorsey Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de,Democracy in America, translated by H. Reeve, revised by F. Bowen, edited by P. Bradley (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C.,Race Matters. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.,Thinking about Crime, revised ed. (New York: Basic Books, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., “What to Do About Crime,”Commentary 1994, September: 25–34.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A version of this article was delivered at the 1994 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Hyatt Regency Hotel, Miami, Florida, November 9–12, 1994.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levine, J.P. Federal crime legislation through the eyes of Alexis de Tocquiville. Crime Law Soc Change 23, 175–189 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301635

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301635

Keywords

Navigation