Skip to main content
Log in

Critical implications of Franz Boas'theory and methodology

  • Essays
  • Published:
Dialectical Anthropology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Grand Scheme of unilinear evolution as it was developed in the nineteenth century, placing Western European and American civilization at the pinnacle of humanity, was vigorously attacked by the Boasian school, and the theory of cultural relativism was forged in the heat of many long theoretical battles in the discipline. Simultaneously, the Boas school attacked the fundamental tenets of white supremacy by showing with solid empirical studies that race, language and culture were not coextensive entities and that there was no innate racial inheritance guaranteeing the white man's natural right (or duty) to rule.

The attack on race prejudice and ethnocentrism, however, never led to an allout attack on exploitation of subject peoples, to an interest in the modes or oppression and their cultural consequences, or even to scholarly acknowledgement of the fact of exploitation. In fact, the Boas school never showed any real interest in studying thesituation of conquest and exploitation as such.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hitchens, J. Critical implications of Franz Boas'theory and methodology. Dialect Anthropol 19, 237–253 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301456

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301456

Keywords

Navigation