Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond proportionate punishment: Difficult cases and the 1991 Criminal Justice Act

  • Articles
  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within six months of implementation, the Criminal Justice Act 1991, which had been hailed as the most important piece of criminal justice legislation in England and Wales for many years, was already being undermined in practice, and a new Act, which amends or even reverses some of its more progressive principles, was brought before Parliament. This paper looks at some problems of proportionality in practice — through discussion of penological principles, and through consideration of the kinds of cases which are most difficult for a desert approach. Alternative ideas are examined to see whether they could offer any better framework for penal policy and practice. A “mixed” theory is advocated, with parsimony as its most important principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J.,The Penal System: An Introduction (London: Sage, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crook, F.,The 1991 Criminal Justice Act: A Reformer's Perspective (address to conference on the Criminal Justice Act, Center for Criminal Justice Studies, University of Northumbria, March 1993).

  3. Hudson, B., “Punishing the poor: a critique of the dominance of legal reasoning in penal policy and practice”, in A. Duff, S. Marshall, R.E. Dobash and R.P. Dobash (eds)Penal theory and practice: Tradition and innovation in criminal justice (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashworth, A., “Criminal Justice and Deserved Sentences”,Criminal Law Review, 1989 (May), 340–55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hudson, B.,Justice through Punishment (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, S.,Drifting into a Law and Order Society (London: Cobden Trust, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scraton, P. (ed),Law, Order and the Authoritarian State (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loveday, B., “Right Agendas: Law and Order in England and Wales”,International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 1992 (20), 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gamble, A.,The Free Economy and the Strong State: the Politics of Thatcherism (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hall, S. (1980), oc cit); (London: Cobden Trust, Gamble, A. (1988, op cit); Scraton, P. (1987), op cit).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smart, C.,Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ashworth, A.,Principles of Criminal Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991); Von Hirsch, A.,Doing Justice (New York): Hill and Wang, 1976); Van den Haag, E.,Punishing Criminals (New York: Basic Books, 1975); Wilson, J.Q.,Thinking About Crime (New York: Basic Books, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Von Hirsch, A.,Past or Future Crimes? (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Braithwaite, J. and Pettit, P.,Not Just Deserts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ashworth, A. and Von Hirsch, A., “NotNot Just Deserts: A Reply to Braithwaite and Pettit”,Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1992 (12: 1) 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Williams, B., “Bail Bandits: the construction of a moral panic”,Critical Social Policy, 1993 (37), 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nash, M. “Dangerousness Revisited”,International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 1992 (20), 337–49.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hudson, B.,Penal Policy and Social Justice (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. see, for example, Cook, D.,Paying for Crime (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1989) on social security fraud and tax evasion.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kerruish, V.,Jurisprudence as Ideology (London: Routledge, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. for example Carlen, P.,Alternatives to Women's Imprisonment (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990) for a model of “woman wise” penology and Hudson, B., “Penal Policy and Racial Justice”, in L. Gelsthorpe and W. McWilliams (eds)Minority Ethnic Groups in the Criminal Justice System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993) on racially just penology.

    Google Scholar 

  22. for a fuller discussion of these issues, see Hudson, B.,Penal Policy and Social Justice (op cit“ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Von Hirsch, A. and Ashworth, A. (eds),Principled Sentencing (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Von Hirsch, A. and Jareborg, N., “Gauging Criminal Harm: A Living-Standard Analysis”,Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1991 (11:1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hudson, B.,Penal Policy and Social Justice (op cit)“.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tonry, M., “Proportionality, parsimony, and interchangeability of punishments” in A. Duff, S. Marshall, R.E. Dobash and R.P. Dobash (eds) (1994), oc cit).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kerruish, V. (1991, op cit).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marenin, O., “Parking tickets and class repression: the concept of policing in critical theories of criminal justice”,Contemporary Crises, 1982 (6), 241–66.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Von Hirsch, A., “Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment”, in M. Tonry (ed),Crime and Justice — A Review of Research, 16 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Braithwaite, J. and Pettit, P., (1990, op cit).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hart, H.L.A.,Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Oxford: University of Oxford Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lacey, N.,State Punishment (London: Routledge, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hart, H.L.A. (1968, op cit).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Von Hirsch, A.,Censure and Sanctions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993); Walker, N.,Why Punish? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Morris, N.,Madness and the Criminal Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Braithwaite, J. and Pettit, P. (1990, op cit).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rotman, E.,Beyond Punishment (Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  38. see, for example, Matthews, R., “Alternatives to and in prisons: a realist approach”, in P. Carlen and D. Cook (eds),Paying for Crime (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mathiesen, T.,Prison on Trial (London: Sage, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gilligan, C.,In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to Nicola Lacey, Mike Levi, Mike Maguire and Andrew Von Hirsch for comments on the first draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hudson, B.A. Beyond proportionate punishment: Difficult cases and the 1991 Criminal Justice Act. Crime Law Soc Change 22, 59–78 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01300839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01300839

Keywords

Navigation