Ethnography, storytelling and the fiction of Toshio Mori

Conclusion

Anthropology has always been concerned with “shocking” the reader and with “deconstructing” the reader's view of the world by confrontation with that which is seemingly most alien. Nor is the call for self-reflexive research and writing new. Stanley Diamond's work offers one of the most eloquent visions of a self-reflexive anthropology as cultural critique.²⁶ In view of the overwhelming fascination in anthropology with post-modernism, it is useful to remind oneself that not only are the questions raised by post-modernists of long standing, but also that such questions can become an end in themselves, a way to avoid taking positions and to avoid responsibility.

Fiction and ethnography should not be confused, nor should one be a substitute for the other. Ethnography has to travel on a fine line between positivist claims of representing some form of objective truth, an impressionistic pseudo-fiction or an ever more inward-turning contemplation of its own contradictions. To do ethnographic work is to accept the obligation to keep trying to elucidate while resisting the attraction of final, definitive interpretations and continually questioning the media of both research and writing that are being employed.